A randomized phase III study of carfilzomib vs low-dose corticosteroids with optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (FOCUS)
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
27416912
PubMed Central
PMC5220126
DOI
10.1038/leu.2016.176
PII: leu2016176
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- anemie chemicky indukované MeSH
- cyklofosfamid aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hormony kůry nadledvin aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom komplikace farmakoterapie mortalita MeSH
- neutropenie chemicky indukované MeSH
- oligopeptidy aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- trombocytopenie chemicky indukované MeSH
- záchranná terapie škodlivé účinky metody mortalita MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- carfilzomib MeSH Prohlížeč
- cyklofosfamid MeSH
- hormony kůry nadledvin MeSH
- oligopeptidy MeSH
This randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter study compared carfilzomib monotherapy against low-dose corticosteroids and optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients were randomized (1:1) to receive carfilzomib (10-min intravenous infusion; 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 27 mg/m2 thereafter) or a control regimen of low-dose corticosteroids (84 mg of dexamethasone or equivalent corticosteroid) with optional cyclophosphamide (1400 mg) for 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Three-hundred and fifteen patients were randomized to carfilzomib (n=157) or control (n=158). Both groups had a median of five prior regimens. In the control group, 95% of patients received cyclophosphamide. Median OS was 10.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4-14.4) vs 10.0 months (95% CI 7.7-12.0) with carfilzomib vs control (hazard ratio=0.975; 95% CI 0.760-1.249; P=0.4172). Progression-free survival was similar between groups; overall response rate was higher with carfilzomib (19.1 vs 11.4%). The most common grade ⩾3 adverse events were anemia (25.5 vs 30.7%), thrombocytopenia (24.2 vs 22.2%) and neutropenia (7.6 vs 12.4%) with carfilzomib vs control. Median OS for single-agent carfilzomib was similar to that for an active doublet control regimen in heavily pretreated RRMM patients.
Amedeo Avogadro University of Eastern Piedmont Novara Italy
Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Israel
Charles University Teaching Hospital Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona Ancona Italy
Clínica Universidad de Navarra CIMA IDISNA Navarra Spain
Hadassah Medical Center Jerusalem Israel
Hopital Huriez CHRU Lille France
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Hospital Elisabethinen Linz Linz Austria
Institut Català d'Oncologia Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona Spain
Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Meir Medical Center Kfar Saba Israel
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
Nicolaus Copernicus Hospital Toruń Poland
Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc an Amgen subsidiary South San Francisco CA USA
Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház Vasvári Pál Hungary
Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
Southampton General Hospital Hampshire UK
St István and St László Hospital of Budapest Budapest Hungary
University College London Cancer Institute London UK
University Hospital La Fe and Universidad Católica de València 'San Vicente Mártir' València Spain
University Hospital Olomouc and Medical Faculty of Palacky University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
University Medicine Mainz Mainz Germany
University of Pécs Pécs Hungary
University of Torino Torino Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 2008; 111: 2516–2520. PubMed PMC
Kumar SK, Therneau TM, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Rajkumar SV et al. Clinical course of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79: 867–874. PubMed
Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ, Morgan G, Richardson PG, Crowley J et al. Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter international myeloma working group study. Leukemia 2012; 26: 149–157. PubMed PMC
Durie BG, Moreau P, Sonneveld P, Morgan GJ, Lahuerta JJ, Beksac M et al. Regional differences in the treatment approaches for relapsed multiple myeloma: an IMF study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 15s (abstract 8095).
Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster M, Irwin D, Stadtmauer E, Facon T et al. Extended follow-up of a phase 3 trial in relapsed multiple myeloma: final time-to-event results of the APEX trial. Blood 2007; 110: 3557–3560. PubMed
Anderson KC, Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV, Stewart AK, Weber D, Richardson P et al. Clinically relevant end points and new drug approvals for myeloma. Leukemia 2008; 22: 231–239. PubMed
van de Donk NW, Lokhorst HM, Dimopoulous M, Cavo M, Morgan G, Einsele H et al. Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents. Cancer Treat Rev 2011; 37: 266–283. PubMed
Dimopoulos MA, Richardson PG, Moreau P, Anderson KC. Current treatment landscape for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015; 12: 42–54. PubMed
Offidani M, Corvatta L, Caraffa P, Leoni P, Pautasso C, Larocca A et al. Pomalidomide for the treatment of relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma: a review of biological and clinical data. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 14: 499–510. PubMed
Siegel DS, Martin T, Wang M, Vij R, Jakubowiak AJ, Lonial S et al. A phase 2 study of single-agent carfilzomib (PX-171-003-A1) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2012; 120: 2817–2825. PubMed PMC
Jagannath S, Vij R, Stewart AK, Trudel S, Jakubowiak AJ, Reiman T et al. An open-label, single-arm pilot phase II study (PX-171-003-A0) of low-dose, single-agent carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2012; 12: 310–318. PubMed
Vij R, Siegel DS, Jagannath S, Stewart AK, McDonagh K, Bahlis N et al. An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study of single-agent carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma who have been previously treated with bortezomib. Br J Haematol 2012; 158: 739–748. PubMed PMC
Vij R, Wang M, Kaufman JL, Lonial S, Jakubowiak AJ, Stewart AK et al. An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 (PX-171-004) study of single-agent carfilzomib in bortezomib-naive patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2012; 119: 5661–5670. PubMed PMC
Badros AZ, Vij R, Martin T, Zonder JA, Kunkel L, Wang Z et al. Carfilzomib in multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: pharmacokinetics and safety. Leukemia 2013; 27: 1707–1714. PubMed PMC
Siegel D, Martin T, Nooka A, Harvey RD, Vij R, Niesvizky R et al. Integrated safety profile of single-agent carfilzomib: experience from 526 patients enrolled in 4 phase II trials. Haematologica 2013; 98: 1753–1761. PubMed PMC
Brandes LJ, Israels LG. Weekly low-dose cyclophosphamide and alternate-day prednisone: an effective low toxicity regimen for advanced myeloma. Eur J Haematol 1987; 39: 362–368. PubMed
de Weerdt O, van de Donk NW, Veth G, Bloem AC, Hagenbeek A, Lokhorst HM. Continuous low-dose cyclophosphamide-prednisone is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Neth J Med 2001; 59: 50–56. PubMed
Zhou F, Guo L, Shi H, Lin C, Hou J. Continuous administration of low-dose cyclophosphamide and prednisone as a salvage treatment for multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2010; 10: 51–55. PubMed
Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, Bladé J, Barlogie B, Anderson K et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2006; 20: 1467–1473. PubMed
Bladé J, Samson D, Reese D, Apperley J, Björkstrand B, Gahrton G et al. Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 1998; 102: 1115–1123. PubMed
Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW, Irwin D, Stadtmauer EA, Facon T et al. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2487–2498. PubMed
NCCNClinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Multiple Myeloma version 4.2015. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/myeloma.pdf accessed 23 April 2015.
Stewart AK, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Masszi T, Špička I, Oriol A et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 142–152. PubMed
Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Joshua D, Pour L, Hajek R et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: 27–38. PubMed
Interpreting clinical trial data in multiple myeloma: translating findings to the real-world setting
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01302392