BACKGROUND: One of the main challenges in modern science is the amount of data produced by the experimental work; it is difficult to store, organize and share the scientific data and to extract the wealth of knowledge. Experimental method descriptions in scientific publications are often incomplete, which complicates experimental reproducibility. The proposed system was created in order to address these issues. It provides a solution for management of the experimental data and metadata to support the reproducibility. IMPLEMENTATION: The system is implemented as a repository for experiment descriptions and experimental data. It has three main entry points: desktop application for protocol design and data processing, web interface dedicated for protocol and data management, and web-based interface for mobile devices suitable for the field experiments. The functionality of desktop client can be extended using the custom plug-ins for data extraction and data processing. The system provides several methods to support experimental reproducibility: standardized terminology support, data and metadata at a single location, standardized protocol design or protocol evolution. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The system was tested in the framework of international infrastructure project AQUAEXCEL with five pilot installations at different institutes. The general testing in Tissue culture certified laboratory, Institute of complex systems and IFREMER verified the usability under different research infrastructures. The specific testing focused on the data processing modules and plug-ins demonstrated the modularity of the system for the specific conditions. The BioWes system represents experimental data as black box and therefore can handle any data type so as to provide broad usability for a variety of experiments and provide the data management infrastructure to improve the reproducibility and data sharing. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed system provides the tools for standard data management operations and extends the support by the standardization possibilities, protocol evolution with visualization features and modularity based on the data processing modules and device communication plug-ins. The software can be used at different organization levels: from a single researcher (to improve data organization) to research consortium through the central protocols management repository. Support from the protocol design until being shared with the standardization features helps to improve the reproducibility of research work. The platform provides support from experimental protocol design to cooperation using simple sharing.

Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters Institute of Complex Systems South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Zámek 136 37333 Nove Hrady Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Shaw J. 2014. http://www.harvardmagazine.com/2014/03/why-big-data-is-a-big-deal. Accessed 22 June 2015.

Achenbach J. 2015. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/feb/07/scienctific-research-peer-review-reproducing-data. Accessed 22 June 2015.

Casadevall A, Fang FC. Reproducible science. Infect Immun. 2010;78(12):4972–4975. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00908-10. PubMed DOI PMC

Cartho W. Metadata. An overview. 2015. http://www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index.php/nlasp/article/view/1019/1289. Accessed 22 June 2015.

Chen Jake, Lonardi Stefano., editors. Biological Data Mining. Boca Raton: Chapman Hall / Taylor and Francis; 2009.

Lemberger T. Tools of discovery. Mol Syst Biol. 2013;10(1):715. doi: 10.1002/msb.201305048. PubMed DOI PMC

Fecher B, Friesike S, Hebing M. What drives academic data sharing? PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0118053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118053. PubMed DOI PMC

Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, Aydinoglu AU, Wu L. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101. PubMed DOI PMC

QUARTZY. 2015. https://www.quartzy.com/. Accessed 22 June 2015

Milsted AJ, Hale JR, Frey JG, Neylon C. LabTrove: a lightweight, web based, laboratory “blog” as a route towards a marked up record of work in a bioscience research laboratory. PLoS ONE. 2014;8(7):e7469. PubMed PMC

E-NOTEBOOK. 2015. http://www.cambridgesoft.com/E-Notebook2.aspx. Accessed 22 June 2015.

SEEK. 2015. http://www.seek4science.org/. Accessed 22 June 2015.

AQUAEXCEL. 2015. http://www.aquaexcel.eu/. Accessed 22 June 2015.

Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotech. 2007;25:1251–1255. doi: 10.1038/nbt1346. PubMed DOI PMC

Cowell LG, Smith B. Infectious disease ontology. In: Sintchenko V, editor. Infectious disease informatics. New York: Springer; 2010. pp. 373–395.

Kibbe WA, Arze C, Felix V, Mitraka E, Bolton E, Fu G, Mungall CJ, Binder JX, Malone J, Vasant D, Parkinson H, Schriml LM. Disease ontology 2015 update: an expanded and updated database of human diseases for linking biomedical knowledge through disease data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D1071–D1078. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1011. PubMed DOI PMC

Whetzel PL, Noy NF, Shah NH, Alexande PR, Nyulas C, Tudorache T, Musen MA. BioPortal: enhanced functionality via new web services from the National Center for Biomedical Ontology to access and use ontologies in software applications. Nucl Acids Res. 2011;39(suppl 2):W541–W545. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr469. PubMed DOI PMC