Andrographolide: antibacterial activity against common bacteria of human health concern and possible mechanism of action

. 2017 May ; 62 (3) : 237-244. [epub] 20170117

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid28097636
Odkazy

PubMed 28097636
DOI 10.1007/s12223-017-0496-9
PII: 10.1007/s12223-017-0496-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Increasing bacterial resistance to common drugs is a major public health concern for the treatment of infectious diseases. Certain naturally occurring compounds of plant sources have long been reported to possess potential antimicrobial activity. This study was aimed to investigate the antibacterial activity and possible mechanism of action of andrographolide (Andro), a diterpenoid lactone from a traditional medicinal herb Andrographis paniculata. Extent of antibacterial action was assessed by minimal bactericidal concentration method. Radiolabeled N-acetyl glucosamine, leucine, thymidine, and uridine were used to determine the effect of Andro on the biosyntheses of cell wall, protein, DNA, and RNA, respectively. In addition, anti-biofilm potential of this compound was also tested. Andro showed potential antibacterial activity against most of the tested Gram-positive bacteria. Among those, Staphylococcus aureus was found to be most sensitive with a minimal inhibitory concentration value of 100 μg/mL. It was found to be bacteriostatic. Specific inhibition of intracellular DNA biosynthesis was observed in a dose-dependent manner in S. aureus. Andro mediated inhibition of biofilm formation by S. aureus was also found. Considering its antimicrobial potency, Andro might be accounted as a promising lead for new antibacterial drug development.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014 May 15;24(10):2353-9 PubMed

Trop Biomed. 2013 Sep;30(3):467-80 PubMed

Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 26;6:29985 PubMed

J Tradit Complement Med. 2014 Dec 19;5(1):42-50 PubMed

J Biomed Sci. 2016 Apr 16;23 :40 PubMed

Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2013 Aug;3(8):604-10; discussion 609-10 PubMed

Phytomedicine. 2002 Oct;9(7):589-97 PubMed

Planta Med. 2007 Jun;73(6):503-11 PubMed

Integr Cancer Ther. 2007 Sep;6(3):271-80 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(5):381-6 PubMed

Phytomedicine. 1997 Jun;4(2):101-4 PubMed

J Nat Prod. 2008 Jul;71(7):1291-3 PubMed

Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2014;2014:541340 PubMed

J Nat Prod. 2012 Mar 23;75(3):311-35 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2001;46(5):363-70 PubMed

J Nat Prod. 1998 Mar;61(3):362-6 PubMed

Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Mar 15;38(6):864-70 PubMed

Phytother Res. 2014 Nov;28(11):1589-98 PubMed

Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2015 Jan 01;7:255-66 PubMed

Nature. 2003 Nov 20;426(6964):306-10 PubMed

J Int Med Res. 2008 Jan-Feb;36(1):178-86 PubMed

Molecules. 2012 Mar 30;17(4):3866-89 PubMed

Phytother Res. 2000 Aug;14(5):333-8 PubMed

J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2012 Feb;65(2):53-7 PubMed

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Dec;32(12):1763-8 PubMed

Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010 May;2(5):a000414 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...