Next-generation sequencing indicates false-positive MRD results and better predicts prognosis after SCT in patients with childhood ALL
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PubMed
28244980
DOI
10.1038/bmt.2017.16
PII: bmt201716
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma * blood diagnosis genetics therapy MeSH
- Child MeSH
- False Positive Reactions MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Polymerase Chain Reaction * MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Neoplasm, Residual MeSH
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation * MeSH
- High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring via quantitative PCR (qPCR) detection of Ag receptor gene rearrangements has been the most sensitive method for predicting prognosis and making post-transplant treatment decisions for patients with ALL. Despite the broad clinical usefulness and standardization of this method, we and others have repeatedly reported the possibility of false-positive MRD results caused by massive B-lymphocyte regeneration after stem cell transplantation (SCT). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables precise and sensitive detection of multiple Ag receptor rearrangements, thus providing a more specific readout compared to qPCR. We investigated two cohorts of children with ALL who underwent SCT (30 patients and 228 samples). The first cohort consisted of 17 patients who remained in long-term CR after SCT despite having low MRD positivity (<0.01%) at least once during post-SCT monitoring using qPCR. Only one of 27 qPCR-positive samples was confirmed to be positive by NGS. Conversely, 10 of 15 samples with low qPCR-detected MRD positivity from 13 patients who subsequently relapsed were also confirmed to be positive by NGS (P=0.002). These data show that NGS has a better specificity in post-SCT ALL management and indicate that treatment interventions aimed at reverting impending relapse should not be based on qPCR only.
Department of Hematology University Hospital Schleswig Holstein Kiel Germany
Department of Immunology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands
See more in PubMed
Haematologica. 2007 May;92(5):612-8 PubMed
Leukemia. 1999 Jan;13(1):110-8 PubMed
Leukemia. 2010 Mar;24(3):521-35 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Aug;42(3):187-96 PubMed
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;538:115-50 PubMed
Leukemia. 2010 Aug;24(8):1462-9 PubMed
Leukemia. 2008 Mar;22(3):641-4 PubMed
Leukemia. 1998 Dec;12(12):2006-14 PubMed
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007 Jan;48(1):93-100 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 20;27(3):377-84 PubMed
Leukemia. 2007 Apr;21(4):706-13 PubMed
Leukemia. 2007 Apr;21(4):604-11 PubMed
Blood. 2012 Dec 20;120(26):5173-80 PubMed
Blood. 1999 Jun 15;93(12):4079-85 PubMed
Leukemia. 2008 May;22(5):989-97 PubMed
Blood. 2001 Oct 15;98(8):2456-65 PubMed
Blood. 2017 Jan 19;129(3):347-357 PubMed
Leukemia. 2003 Dec;17(12):2257-317 PubMed
Lancet. 1998 Nov 28;352(9142):1731-8 PubMed
Br J Haematol. 2014 Feb;164(3):396-408 PubMed
Leukemia. 2009 May;23(5):944-51 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;34(22):2591-601 PubMed
Blood. 2015 Aug 20;126(8):1045-7 PubMed
Leukemia. 2002 May;16(5):928-36 PubMed
Blood. 2015 May 28;125(22):3501-8 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 10;33(11):1275-84 PubMed
Blood. 1998 Dec 1;92(11):4072-9 PubMed
Leukemia. 2000 Aug;14(8):1426-35 PubMed
Leukemia. 2003 Dec;17(12):2318-57 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003 Oct;32(8):849-51 PubMed
Leukemia. 2002 Jul;16(7):1372-80 PubMed
Quality Control for IG /TR Marker Identification and MRD Analysis