Midterm outcomes of two-staged hybrid ablation of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation using the versapolar epicardial surgical device and subsequent catheter ablation
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
16-32478A
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
PubMed
28921386
DOI
10.1007/s10840-017-0286-y
PII: 10.1007/s10840-017-0286-y
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Atrial fibrillation, Hybrid ablation, Long-standing persistent, Persistent, Versapolar device,
- MeSH
- bezpečnost vybavení MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- chronická nemoc MeSH
- design vybavení MeSH
- elektrokardiografie ambulantní metody MeSH
- elektrokardiografie metody MeSH
- fibrilace síní diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- hodnocení rizik MeSH
- katetrizační ablace přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monitorování fyziologických funkcí přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: Hybrid ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a promising treatment strategy for patients with non-paroxysmal AF, although, data regarding mid-term outcomes are limited. METHODS: Patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF were enrolled. Initially, a thoracoscopic, right-sided, epicardial ablation was performed, with a goal of creating a box lesion on the posterior wall of the left atrium; a novel versapolar radiofrequency (RF) catheter was used. In patients enrolled later, occlusion of the left atrial appendage was also performed. An endocardial procedure was performed 2-4 months later, with the goal of confirming/completing the box lesion and ablating the ganglionated plexi and cavotricuspid isthmus. Efficacy was assessed using multiple 24-h and 1-week Holter monitoring. Analysis was performed to search for variables associated with procedure's failure. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (14 persistent and 27 long-standing persistent AF) were enrolled with a mean AF duration of 33.5 ± 33.1 months. Mean follow-up was 507.2 ± 201.1 days (180-731). At the last follow-up visit, 27(65%) patients were arrhythmia-free, without anti-arrhythmics or need for re-ablation. Additional 4 patients (9.8%) were in sinus rhythm (SR) following re-ablation of postprocedural peri-mitral flutter and 4 (9.8%) were in SR on anti-arrhythmics. Longer periods of preoperative AF were independently associated with worse arrhythmia-free survival (p = 0.015). Serious postoperative complications occurred in 3 (7.3%) patients; only 1 (2.4%) patient had clinical consequences after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid ablation of non-paroxysmal AF using a novel, versapolar RF device yields promising mid-term results. Better arrhythmia-free survival rates were found in AF patients with shorter AF duration.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Feb;5(1):8-14 PubMed
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Mar 25;4(3):e001754 PubMed
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Dec;144(6):1460-5; discussion 1465 PubMed
Europace. 2017 Jan;19(1):58-65 PubMed
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Jan;27(1):41-50 PubMed
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Jan;3(1):38-44 PubMed
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016 Dec;47(3):265-274 PubMed
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar;45(3):401-7 PubMed
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):451-6 PubMed
Europace. 2012 Apr;14(4):528-606 PubMed
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jul 19;7:71 PubMed
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Mar 18;2(2):e004549 PubMed
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Sep;10(9):1280-6 PubMed
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Oct;48(4):531-40; discussion 540-1 PubMed
Innovations (Phila). 2012 Jul-Aug;7(4):254-8 PubMed
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jun;13(6):1246-52 PubMed
Innovations (Phila). 2013 Jul-Aug;8(4):276-83 PubMed
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;100(5):1595-602; discussion 1602-3 PubMed
Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):23-30 PubMed