BACKGROUND: The primary objective of Tissue engineering is a regeneration or replacement of tissues or organs damaged by disease, injury, or congenital anomalies. At present, Tissue engineering repairs damaged tissues and organs with artificial supporting structures called scaffolds. These are used for attachment and subsequent growth of appropriate cells. During the cell growth gradual biodegradation of the scaffold occurs and the final product is a new tissue with the desired shape and properties. In recent years, research workplaces are focused on developing scaffold by bio-fabrication techniques to achieve fast, precise and cheap automatic manufacturing of these structures. Most promising techniques seem to be Rapid prototyping due to its high level of precision and controlling. However, this technique is still to solve various issues before it is easily used for scaffold fabrication. In this article we tested printing of clinically applicable scaffolds with use of commercially available devices and materials. Research presented in this article is in general focused on "scaffolding" on a field of bone tissue replacement. RESULTS: Commercially available 3D printer and Polylactic acid were used to create originally designed and possibly suitable scaffold structures for bone tissue engineering. We tested printing of scaffolds with different geometrical structures. Based on the osteosarcoma cells proliferation experiment and mechanical testing of designed scaffold samples, it will be stated that it is likely not necessary to keep the recommended porosity of the scaffold for bone tissue replacement at about 90%, and it will also be clarified why this fact eliminates mechanical properties issue. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the size of an individual pore could be double the size of the recommended range between 0.2-0.35 mm without affecting the cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: Rapid prototyping technique based on Fused deposition modelling was used for the fabrication of designed scaffold structures. All the experiments were performed in order to show how to possibly solve certain limitations and issues that are currently reported by research workplaces on the field of scaffold bio-fabrication. These results should provide new valuable knowledge for further research.

2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University 5 Úvalu 84 150 06 Prague 6 Czechia

Department of Instrumentation and Control Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Technická 4 166 07 Prague 6 Czechia

Department of Mechanics Biomechanics and Mechatronics Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Technická 4 166 07 Prague 6 Czechia

Department of Stomatology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University and General University Hospital Prague Kateřinská 32 12801 Prague 2 Czechia

Faculty of Science Charles University Albertov 6 12843 Prague 2 Czechia

Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences Vídeňská 1083 14220 Prague 4 Czechia

University Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings Třinecká 1024 273 43 Buštěhrad Czechia

University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciencies Brno Palackého tř 1946 1 612 42 Brno Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Hutmacher DW, Sittinger M, Risbud MV. Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. Trends Biotechnology. 2004;22:354–362. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.05.005. PubMed DOI

Chanjuan D, Yonggang LV. Application of collagen scaffold in tissue engineering: recent advances and new perspectives. Polymers. 2016. doi:10.3390/polym8020042. PubMed PMC

Ha TLB, Quan TM, Vu DN, Si DM. Naturally derived biomaterials: preparation and application. Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering. 2013. doi:10.5772/55668.

Guntillake PA, Adhikari R. Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater. 2003;5:1–16. doi: 10.22203/eCM.v005a01. PubMed DOI

Munirah S, Kim SH, Ruszymah BHI, Khang G. The use of fibrin and poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) hybrid scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering: an in vivo analysis. Eur Cell Mater. 2008;15:41–52. doi: 10.22203/eCM.v015a04. PubMed DOI

Yang S, Leong KF, Du Z, Chua CK. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering—part I: traditional factors. Tissue Eng. 2001;7:679–689. doi: 10.1089/107632701753337645. PubMed DOI

Subia B, Kundu J, Kundu SC. Biomaterial scaffold fabrication techniques for potential tissue engineering applications. Tissue Engineering. InTech. 2010. doi:10.5772/8581.

Chia HN, Wu BM. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng. 2015; doi:10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4. PubMed PMC

Lee VC. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. Pharmacy and Therapeutic. 2014:704–11. PubMed PMC

Osama AA, Saied MD. Fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds using rapid prototyping techniques. Engineering Technology Int J Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic Manuf Engineering. 2011;5:11.

Polo-Corrales L, Latorre-Esteves M, Ramirez-Vick JE. Scaffold Design for Bone Regeneration. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014:15–56. PubMed PMC

Ramtani S. Mechanical modeling of cell/ECM and cell/cell interactions during the contraction of a fibroblast-populated collagen microsphere: theory and model simulation. J Biomech. 2004; PubMed

Ma PX, Elisseeff J. Scaffolding in tissue engineering. Biomed Eng Online. 2006. doi:10.1186/1475-925×-5-529.

Velasco MA, Narváez-Tovar CA, Garzón-Alvarado DA. Design, materials, and Mechanobiology of biodegradable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. BioMed Res Inter. 2015. doi:10.1155/2015/729076. PubMed PMC

Öchsner A, da Silva LFM, Altenbach H. Characterization and development of biosystems and biomaterials. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2012. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31470-4.

Whang K, Healy KE, Elenz DR. Engineering bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel microarchitecture. Tissue Eng. 1999;5:35–51. doi: 10.1089/ten.1999.5.35. PubMed DOI

Serra T, Mateos-Timoneda MA, Planell JA, Navarro M. 3D printed PLA-based scaffolds: a versatile tool in regenerative medicine. Organ. 2013;9(4):239–244. PubMed PMC

Heo DN, Castro NJ, Lee SJ, Noh H, Zhu W, Zhang LG. Enhanced bone tissue regeneration using a 3D printed microstructure incorporated with a hybrid nano hydrogel. Nano. 2017;9:5055–5062. PubMed PMC

An J, Teoh JEM, Suntornnond R, Chua CK. Design and 3D printing of scaffolds and tissues. Engineering. 2015; doi:10.15302/J-ENG-2015061.

Rampichová M, Buzgo M, Míčková A, Vocetková K, Sovková V, Lukášová V, Filová E, Rustichelli F, Amler E. Platelet-functionalized three-dimensional poly-ε-caprolactone fibrous scaffold prepared using centrifugal spinning for delivery of growth factors. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:347–361. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S120206. PubMed DOI PMC

Vagaská B, Bacáková L, Filová E, Balík K. Osteogenic cells on bio-inspired materials for bone tissue engineering. Physiol Res. 2010;59(3):309–322. PubMed

Bacakova L, Filova E, Parizek M, Ruml T, Svorcik V. Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29(6):739–767. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.004. PubMed DOI

Von Recum AF, Van Kooten TG. The influence of micro-topography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants. J Biomater Sci Polym. 1995; PubMed

Navarro M, Engel E, Planell JA, Amaral I, Barbosa M, Ginebra MP. Surface characterization and cell response of a PLA/CaP glass biodegradable composite material. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;85(2):477–486. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31546. PubMed DOI

Kao CT, Lin CC, Chen YW, Yeh CH, Fang HY, Shie MY. Poly (dopamine) coating of 3D printed poly (lactic acid) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;56:165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.06.028. PubMed DOI

Serra T, Ortiz-Hernandez M, Engel ME, Planell JA, Navarro M. Relevance of PEG in PLA-based blends for tissue engineering 3D-printed scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;38:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.003. PubMed DOI

Khang G, Lee SJ, Lee JH, Kim YS, Lee HB. Interaction of fibroblast cells on poly (lactide-co-glycolide) surface with wettability chemogradient. Bio-Medical Materials & Engineering. 1999; PubMed

Choee JH, Lee SJ, Lee YM, Rhee JM, Lee HB, Khang G. Proliferation rate of fibroblast cells on polyethylene surfaces with wettability gradient. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2004;92:599–606. doi: 10.1002/app.20048. DOI

Lee SJ, Khang G, Lee YM, Lee HB. The effect of surface wettability on induction and growth of neurites from the PC-12 cell on a polymer surface. J Colloid Inter Sci. 2003;259:228–235. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00163-7. PubMed DOI

Hu AZ, Shi JB, Rong ZM, Xue P, Gong FR, Cheng SJ. Acta Polymerica Sinica. Adsorption Behav Collagen Spin-coated pla Surface. 2010; doi:10.3724/sp.j.1105.2010.09404.

Zhang HP, Lu X, Leng Y, Fang L, Qu S, Feng B, Weng J, Wang J. Molecular dynamics simulations on the interaction between polymers and hydroxyapatite with and without coupling agents. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:1169–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.014. PubMed DOI

Pamula E, Filová E, Bacáková L, Lisá V, Adamczyk D. Resorbable polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: the influence of their microstructure on the growth of human osteoblast-like MG 63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89(2):432–443. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31977. PubMed DOI

Filová E, Suchý T, Sucharda Z, Supová M, Zaloudková M, Balík K, Lisá V, Slouf M, Bačáková L. Support for the initial attachment, growth and differentiation of MG-63 cells: a comparison between nano-size hydroxyapatite and micro-size hydroxyapatite in composites. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:3687–3706. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S56661. PubMed DOI PMC

Huang J, Xiong J, Liu J, Zhu W, Chen J, Duan L, Zhang J, Wang D. Evaluation of the novel three-dimensional porous poly (L-lactic acid)/nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold. Biomed Mater Eng. 2015;26:197–205. PubMed

Lossdörfer S, Schwartz Z, Wang L, Lohmann CH, Turner JD, Wieland M, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. Microrough implant surface topographies increase osteogenesis by reducing osteoclast formation and activity. J Biomed Mat Res A. 2004;70:361–369. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30025. PubMed DOI

Itälä AI, Ylänen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT. Pore diameter of more than 100 mu m is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001:679–83. PubMed

Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005:5474–91. PubMed

Cavo M, Scaglione S. Scaffold microstructure effects on functional and mechanical performance: integration of theoretical and experimental approaches for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng. 2016:872–9. PubMed

Kilian KA, Bugarija B, Lahn BT, Mrksich M. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:4872–4877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903269107. PubMed DOI PMC

Fischer B, Heffeter P, Kryeziu K, Gille L, Meier SM, Berger W, Kowol CR, Bernhard K. Keppler. Poly (lactic acid) nanoparticles of the lead anticancer ruthenium compound KP1019 and its surfactant-mediated activation Dalton trans. 2014; 43:1096-1104. PubMed

Jo HH, Lee SJ, Park JS, Lee JH, Kim WD, Kwon SK, Lee JH, Lim JY, Park SA. Characterization and preparation of three-dimensional-printed biocompatible scaffolds with highly porous strands. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;16:11943–11946. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2016.13622. DOI

Park YO, Myung SW, Kook MS, Jung SC, Kim BH. Cell proliferation on macro/nano surface structure and collagen immobilization of 3D polycaprolactone scaffolds. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;16(2):1415–1419. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2016.11920. PubMed DOI

Roh HS, Myung SW, Jung SC, Kim BH. Fabrication of 3D scaffolds with nano-hydroxyapatite for improving the preosteoblast cell-biological performance. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015;15(8):5585–5588. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2015.10451. PubMed DOI

Thanh DTM, Trang PTT, Thom NT, Phuong NT, Nam PT, Trang NTT, Seo-Park J, Hoang T. Effects of porogen on structure and properties of poly lactic acid/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites (PLA/HAp) J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016;16:9450–9459. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2016.12032. DOI

Park H, Lim DJ, Lee SH, Park H. Nanofibrous mineralized electrospun scaffold as a substrate for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2016;12:2076–2082. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2016.2306. PubMed DOI

Yang M, Zhou G, Castano-Izquierdo H, Zhu Y, Mao C. Biomineralization of natural Collagenous Nanofibrous membranes and their potential use in bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015;11(3):447–456. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2015.2038. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhao X, Komatsu DE, Hadjiargyrou M. Delivery of rhBMP-2 plasmid DNA complexes via a PLLA/collagen electrospun scaffold induces ectopic bone formation. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2016;12(6):1285–1296. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2016.2250. PubMed DOI

Chou YC, Lee D, Chang TM, Hsu YH, Yu YH, Liu SJ, Ueng SW. Development of a three-dimensional (3D) printed biodegradable cage to convert Morselized Corticocancellous bone chips into a structured cortical bone graft. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; doi:10.3390/ijms17040595. PubMed PMC

Rogina A, Pribolsan L, Hanzek A, et al. Macroporous poly (lactic acid) construct supporting the osteoinductive porous chitosan-based hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Polymer. 2016:172–81.

Li HY, Li H, Wang BJ, Gu Q, Jiang ZQ, Wu XD. Synthesis and properties of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/chitin nanocrystals composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. Chinese Che Lett. 2014;25:1635–1638. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2014.06.019. DOI

Stancari F, Zanni B, Bernardi F, Calandriello M, Salvatorelli G. Use of PLA-PGA (copolymerised polylactic/polyglycolic acids) as a bone filler: clinical experience and histologic study of a case. Quintessence. 2000;51(1):47–52.

Serino G, Biancu S, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using a polylactide and polyglycolide sponge as space filler: a clinical and histological study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(5):651–658. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00970.x. PubMed DOI

Born AK, Rottmar M, Lischer S, Pleckova M, Bruinink A, Maniura-Weber K. Correlation cell architecture with osteogenesis: first steps towards live single cell monitoring. Eur Cells Mater. 2009;18:49–62. PubMed

Gong Z, Wezeman FH. Inhibitory effect of alcohol on osteogenic differentiation in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28:468–479. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000118315.58404.C1. PubMed DOI

Baldino L, Naddeo F, Cardea S, Naddeo A, Reverchon E. FEM modeling of the reinforcement mechanism of Hydroxyapatite in PLLA scaffolds produced by supercritical drying, for tissue engineering applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.07.021. PubMed

Entezari A, Fang J, Sue A, Zhang Z, Swain MV, Li Q. Yielding behaviors of polymeric scaffolds with implications to tissue engineering. Mater Lett. 2016:108–11.

Oftadeh R, Karimi Z, Villa-Camacho J, Tanck E, Verdonschot N, Goebel R, Snyder BD, Hashemi HN, Vaziri A, Nazarian A. Curved beam computed tomography based structural rigidity analysis of bones with simulated Lytic defect: a comparative study with finite element analysis scientific reports. Nature Publishing Group. 2016. doi:10.1038/srep32397. PubMed PMC

ISO 14243 - Implants for surgery wear of total knee-joint prostheses Part 1: Loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with load control and corresponding environmental conditions for test. International Organization for Standardization. 2009. https://www.iso.org/standard/44262.html. Accessed 3 Aug 2017.

Chen X, Gu N, Yang HL, Zhang W, Luo ZP. Regulation of basalt fibers on PLA scaffold biodegradation. Orthopaedic research society. 2011. http://www.ors.org/Transactions/57/1914.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2017.

Carter DR, Spengler DM. Mechanical-properties and composition of cortical bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;9:192–217. PubMed

Gibson LJ. The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J Biomech. 1985;18:317–328. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(85)90287-8. PubMed DOI

Sabree I, Gough JE, Derby B. Mechanical properties of porous ceramic scaffolds: influence of internal dimensions. Ceram Int. 2015:8425–32.

Appuhamillage GA, Reagan JC, Khorsandi S, Davidson JR, Voit W, Smaldone RA. 3D printed remendable polylactic acid blends with uniform mechanical strength enabled by a dynamic Diels–Alder reaction. Polym Chem. 2017; doi:10.1039/c7py00310b.

De Santis R, Russo A, Gloria A, D’Amora U, Russo T, Panseri S, Sandri M, Tampieri A, Marcacci M, Dediu VA, Wilde CJ, Ambrosio L. Towards the design of 3D fiber-deposited poly (ε-caprolactone)/lron-doped Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015;11(7):1236–1246. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2015.2065. PubMed DOI

Rahul MR, Amol VJ, Douglas EH. Poly (lactic acid) modifications. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35:338–356. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.003. DOI

Teng CP, Mya KY, Win KY, Yeo CC, Low M, He C, Yong HM. Star-shaped polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane-polycaprolactone-polyurethane as biomaterials for tissue engineering application. NPG Asia Materials. 2014; doi:10.1038/am.2014.102.

Carboxymethylated and Sulfated Furcellaran from Furcellaria lumbricalis and Its Immobilization on PLA Scaffolds

Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and Polycaprolactone (PCL) Based Blends for Tissue Engineering and Bone Medical Applications Processed by FDM 3D Printing

In Vitro Characterization of Poly(Lactic Acid)/ Poly(Hydroxybutyrate)/ Thermoplastic Starch Blends for Tissue Engineering Application

Note on the use of different approaches to determine the pore sizes of tissue engineering scaffolds: what do we measure?