• This record comes from PubMed

Phylogenetic trophic specialization: a robust comparison of herbivorous guilds

. 2017 Dec ; 185 (4) : 551-559. [epub] 20171020

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
14/16082-9 Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
14/16006-0 Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
14-04258S Grantová Agentura České Republiky
669609 European Research Council - International
841885 Division of Environmental Biology
9628840 Division of Environmental Biology
9707928 Division of Environmental Biology
0211591 Division of Environmental Biology
0515678 Division of Environmental Biology
CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0006 Jihočeská Univerzita v Českých Budějovicích
311800/215-7 Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Links

PubMed 29052768
DOI 10.1007/s00442-017-3980-7
PII: 10.1007/s00442-017-3980-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Resource specialization is a key concept in ecology, but it is unexpectedly difficult to parameterize. Differences in resource availability, sampling effort and abundances preclude comparisons of incompletely sampled biotic interaction webs. Here, we extend the distance-based specialization index (DSI) that measures trophic specialization by taking resource phylogenetic relatedness and availability into account into a rescaled version, DSI*. It is a versatile metric of specialization that expands considerably the scope and applicability, hence the usefulness, of DSI. The new metric also accounts for differences in abundance and sampling effort of consumers, which enables robust comparisons among distinct guilds of consumers. It also provides an abundance threshold for the reliability of the metric for rare species, a very desirable property given the difficulty of assessing any aspect of rare species accurately. We apply DSI* to an extensive dataset on interactions between insect herbivores from four folivorous guilds and their host plants in Papua New Guinean rainforests. We demonstrate that DSI*, contrary to the original DSI, is largely independent of sample size and weakly and non-linearly related with several host specificity measures that do not adjust for plant phylogeny. Thus, DSI* provides further insights into host specificity patterns; moreover, it is robust to the number and phylogenetic diversity of plant species selected to be sampled for herbivores. DSI* can be used for a broad range of comparisons of distinct feeding guilds, geographical locations and ecological conditions. This is a key advance in elucidating the interaction structure and evolution of highly diversified systems.

See more in PubMed

Science. 2006 Apr 21;312(5772):431-3 PubMed

Trends Parasitol. 2011 Aug;27(8):355-61 PubMed

Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7 Suppl):S62-75 PubMed

Science. 2006 Aug 25;313(5790):1115-8 PubMed

J Anim Ecol. 2010 Nov;79(6):1193-203 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 13;112(2):442-7 PubMed

Ecology. 1971 Jul;52(4):567-576 PubMed

Methods Ecol Evol. 2015 Jan;6(1):83-91 PubMed

BMC Ecol. 2006 Aug 14;6:9 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2014 Nov;17(11):1341-50 PubMed

Nature. 2002 Apr 25;416(6883):841-4 PubMed

Ecol Evol. 2012 Aug;2(8):1818-25 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 16;107(11):5041-6 PubMed

Nature. 2007 Aug 9;448(7154):696-9 PubMed

Am Nat. 2012 Mar;179(3):351-62 PubMed

Oecologia. 1999 May;119(3):427-434 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2008 Apr;11(4):398-416 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2009 Sep;12(9):949-60 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...