Burden of cardiovascular disease across 29 countries and GPs' decision to treat hypertension in oldest-old
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
RP_2014-04-026
Department of Health - United Kingdom
PubMed
29366388
PubMed Central
PMC5901445
DOI
10.1080/02813432.2018.1426142
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Oldest-old, cardiovascular disease burden, clinical decision-making, hypertension, life expectancy,
- MeSH
- antihypertenziva terapeutické užití MeSH
- cévní mozková příhoda epidemiologie MeSH
- demografie MeSH
- hypertenze farmakoterapie MeSH
- ischemická choroba srdeční epidemiologie MeSH
- kardiovaskulární nemoci epidemiologie MeSH
- komorbidita MeSH
- krevní tlak MeSH
- kvalitativně upravené roky života MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- naděje dožití * MeSH
- praktické lékařství MeSH
- praktičtí lékaři * MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- rozhodování * MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- srovnání kultur MeSH
- věkové faktory MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Brazílie epidemiologie MeSH
- Evropa epidemiologie MeSH
- Nový Zéland epidemiologie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antihypertenziva MeSH
OBJECTIVES: We previously found large variations in general practitioner (GP) hypertension treatment probability in oldest-old (>80 years) between countries. We wanted to explore whether differences in country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden and life expectancy could explain the differences. DESIGN: This is a survey study using case-vignettes of oldest-old patients with different comorbidities and blood pressure levels. An ecological multilevel model analysis was performed. SETTING: GP respondents from European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) countries, Brazil and New Zeeland. SUBJECTS: This study included 2543 GPs from 29 countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: GP treatment probability to start or not start antihypertensive treatment based on responses to case-vignettes; either low (<50% started treatment) or high (≥50% started treatment). CVD burden is defined as ratio of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost due to ischemic heart disease and/or stroke and total DALYs lost per country; life expectancy at age 60 and prevalence of oldest-old per country. RESULTS: Of 1947 GPs (76%) responding to all vignettes, 787 (40%) scored high treatment probability and 1160 (60%) scored low. GPs in high CVD burden countries had higher odds of treatment probability (OR 3.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.00-4.57); in countries with low life expectancy at 60, CVD was associated with high treatment probability (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.12-4.25); but not in countries with high life expectancy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56-1.98). CONCLUSIONS: GPs' choice to treat/not treat hypertension in oldest-old was explained by differences in country-specific health characteristics. GPs in countries with high CVD burden and low life expectancy at age 60 were most likely to treat hypertension in oldest-old. Key Points • General practitioners (GPs) are in a clinical dilemma when deciding whether (or not) to treat hypertension in the oldest-old (>80 years of age). • In this study including 1947 GPs from 29 countries, we found that a high country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden (i.e. myocardial infarction and/or stroke) was associated with a higher GP treatment probability in patients aged >80 years. • However, the association was modified by country-specific life expectancy at age 60. While there was a positive association for GPs in countries with a low life expectancy at age 60, there was no association in countries with a high life expectancy at age 60. • These findings help explaining some of the large variation seen in the decision as to whether or not to treat hypertension in the oldest-old.
b Department of Clinical Sciences Family Medicine Lund University Malmö Sweden
c Senior Researcher Region Kronoberg Växjö Sweden
c Vennesla Primary Health Care Centre Bergen Norway
e Department of Family Medicine Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
f Department of Family Medicine Faculty of Medicine Riga Stradiņs University Riga Latvia
Family Medicine Department Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland
g Leeds Centre for Respiratory Medicine St James's University Hospital Leeds UK
h Kemaliye Town Hospital Erzincan University Erzincan Turkey
i Department of Family Medicine NOVA Medical School Lisbon Portugal
i Timis Society of Family Medicine Sano Med West Private Clinic Timisoara Romania
Institute of Primary Health Care University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Irish College of General Practitioners Dublin Ireland
j Danish College of General Practitioners Copenhagen Denmark
j Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
k Centre for Primary Health Care University of Basel Basel Switzerland
k School of Population Health University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
l Department of General Practice University of Tampere Tampere Finland
o Primary Care and Health Sciences Keele University Keele UK
p Primary Care Unit Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
q Institute of Primary and Community Care Lucerne Lucerne Switzerland
r Institute of Family Medicine Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
s Institute of General Practice Goethe University Frankfurt Main Germany
t Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil
u Department for Family Medicine Medical Faculty University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
x Institute of Primary Care University Hospital Zurich University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
y SSLMG Societé Scientifique Luxembourgois en Medicine generale Luxembourg Luxembourg
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Collaborators GBDRF. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1659–1724. PubMed PMC
Olsen MH, Angell SY, Asma S, et al. A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension. Lancet. 2016;388:2665–2712. PubMed
The United Nations: world population prospects: the 2012 revision; [cited 2017 Nov 6]. Available from: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp.
World Health Organisation (WHO) Active ageing: a policy framework; 2002; [cited 2017 Nov 7]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/67215/1/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf
Materson BJ, Garcia-Estrada M, Preston RA.. Hypertension in the frail elderly. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016;10:536–541. PubMed
Jansen J, McKinn S, Bonner C, et al. General practitioners’ decision making about primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older adults: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0170228. PubMed PMC
van Peet PG, Drewes YM, Gussekloo J, et al. GPs’ perspectives on secondary cardiovascular prevention in older age: a focus group study in the Netherlands. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65:e739–e747. PubMed PMC
Bog-Hansen E, Merlo J, Gullberg B, et al. Survival in patients with hypertension treated in primary care. A population-based follow-up study in the Skaraborg Hypertension and Diabetes Project. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004;22:222–227. PubMed
Getz L, Kirkengen AL, Hetlevik I, et al. Ethical dilemmas arising from implementation of the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. A descriptive epidemiological study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004;22:202–208. PubMed
Streit S, Verschoor M, Rodondi N, et al. Variation in GP decisions on antihypertensive treatment in oldest-old and frail individuals across 29 countries. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17:93. PubMed PMC
World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–2194. PubMed
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) GBD compare data visualization. Seattle (WA): IHME, University of Washington; 2016; [cited 2017 Feb 24]. Available from: http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare
Global Health Observatory data repository of the World Health Organisation (WHO); [cited 2017 Nov 7]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gho/data.
World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision by the United Nations (UN); [cited 2017 Nov 7]. Available from: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population.
McAvoy BR, Kaner EF.. General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far? BMJ. 1996;313:732–733. discussion 3–4. PubMed PMC
Hyman DJ, Pavlik VN.. Self-reported hypertension treatment practices among primary care physicians: blood pressure thresholds, drug choices, and the role of guidelines and evidence-based medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2281–2286. PubMed
Tomasik T, Windak A, Seifert B, et al. The self-perceived role of general practitioners in care of patients with cardiovascular diseases. A survey in Central and Eastern European countries following health care reforms. Int J Cardiol. 2013;164:327–333. PubMed
Kellerman SE, Herold J.. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:61–67. PubMed
Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA.. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–1136. PubMed
Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y, et al. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet. 2015;385:549–562. PubMed
Joshi R, Jan S, Wu Y, et al. Global inequalities in access to cardiovascular health care: our greatest challenge. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1817–1825. PubMed
Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ.. Lessons in uncertainty and humility – clinical trials involving hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1756–1766. PubMed
Williamson JD, Supiano MA, Applegate WB, et al. Intensive vs standard blood pressure control and cardiovascular disease outcomes in adults aged ≥75 years. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:2673–2682. PubMed PMC
Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1887–1898. PubMed
Messerli FH, Sulicka J, Gryglewska B.. Treatment of hypertension in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:972–973. author reply 3–4. PubMed
Oparil S, Lewis CE.. Should patients with cardiovascular risk factors receive intensive treatment of hypertension to <120/80 mm Hg target? A protagonist view from the SPRINT Trial (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). Circulation. 2016;134:1308–1310. PubMed PMC
Lonn EM, Yusuf S. Should patients with cardiovascular risk factors receive intensive treatment of hypertension to <120/80 mm Hg target? An antagonist view from the HOPE-3 Trial (Heart Outcomes Evaluation-3). Circulation. 2016;134:1311–1313. PubMed