The Terminologia Histologica after 10years: Inconsistencies, mistakes, and new proposals
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Historical Article, Journal Article
PubMed
29885444
DOI
10.1016/j.aanat.2018.05.005
PII: S0940-9602(18)30074-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Histological nomenclature, Histological terminology, Histology, Nomenclature, Terminologia Histologica, Terminology,
- MeSH
- Anatomy * history MeSH
- History, 17th Century MeSH
- History, 20th Century MeSH
- History, 21st Century MeSH
- Language history MeSH
- Terminology as Topic * MeSH
- Check Tag
- History, 17th Century MeSH
- History, 20th Century MeSH
- History, 21st Century MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Historical Article MeSH
This article details our experience with the Terminologia Histologica (TH) and its utility in the teaching of histology, cytology, and clinical medicine (e.g., pathology and hematology). Latin histological nomenclature has been used for 43years, and the latest version of the TH has been in use for 15years (although it was only issued publicly within the past 10years). The following findings and ensuing proposals allow us to discuss key points pertaining to the TH and make important suggestions for potential changes to the TH (such as the exclusion and inclusion of various terms). We classify these changes into six groups: 1.) mistakes in the TH, 2.) discrepancies among various Terminologiae, 3.) discrepancies within the TH, 4.) the repetition of terms, 5.) synonyms in the TH, and 6.) missing terms in the TH. Surprisingly, unlike the anatomical nomenclature, the histological nomenclature has been neglected in the literature. This article addresses this problem by reviewing and summarizing the state of this field, pointing out key discrepancies, offering solutions, and highlighting topics for further discussion.
References provided by Crossref.org
Variant Anatomy and Its Terminology
A plea for an extension of the anatomical nomenclature: Organ systems
