Determination of N-(2-hydroxyethyl)valine in globin of ethylene oxide-exposed workers using total acidic hydrolysis and HPLC-ESI-MS2
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
29936296
DOI
10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.06.1212
PII: S0378-4274(18)31451-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Biological monitoring, Ethylene oxide, Globin adducts, N-(2-Hydroxyethyl)valine, Protein hydrolysis,
- MeSH
- bioindikátory MeSH
- ethylenoxid škodlivé účinky krev MeSH
- globiny analýza MeSH
- hmotnostní spektrometrie s elektrosprejovou ionizací * MeSH
- hodnocení rizik MeSH
- hydrolýza MeSH
- hygiena práce * MeSH
- inhalační expozice * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- kyseliny chemie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí metody MeSH
- pracovní expozice * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- valin analogy a deriváty krev MeSH
- vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- 2-hydroxyethylvaline MeSH Prohlížeč
- bioindikátory MeSH
- ethylenoxid MeSH
- globiny MeSH
- kyseliny MeSH
- valin MeSH
Ethylene oxide (EO), an industrial intermediate and gaseous sterilant for medical devices, is carcinogenic to humans, which warrants minimization of exposure in the workplaces. The principal analytical strategy currently used in biomonitoring of exposure to EO consists in the conversion of N-(2-hydroxyethyl) adduct at the N-terminal valine (HEV) in globin to a specific thiohydantoin derivative accessible to GC-MS analysis (modified Edman degradation, MED). Though highly sensitive, the method is laborious and, at least in our hands, not sufficiently robust. Here we developed an alternative strategy of HEV determination based on acidic hydrolysis (AH) of globin followed directly by HPLC-ESI-MS2 analysis. Limit of quantitation is ca. 25 pmol HEV/g globin. Comparative analyses of globin samples from EO-exposed workers by both the AH-based and MED-based methods provided results that correlated well with each other (R2 > 0.95) but those obtained with AH were significantly more accurate (according to external quality control programme G-EQUAS) and repeatible (5% and 6% for intra-day and between-day analyses, respectively). In conclusion, the new AH-based method surpassed MED being similarly sensitive, much less laborious and more reliable, thus applicable as an effective tool for biomonitoring of EO in exposure control and risk assessment.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org