12-week double-blind randomized multicenter study of efficacy and safety of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) versus escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) in out-patients with severe generalized anxiety disorder
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
30135032
DOI
10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.05.006
PII: S0924-977X(18)30121-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Agomelatine, Escitalopram, Generalized anxiety disorder,
- MeSH
- acetamidy škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- anxiolytika škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- citalopram škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- interview psychologický MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- psychiatrické posuzovací škály MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- úzkostné poruchy farmakoterapie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- acetamidy MeSH
- agomelatine MeSH Prohlížeč
- anxiolytika MeSH
- citalopram MeSH
Treatment of severely symptomatic patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) raises particular concerns for clinicians. This 12-week double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) in the treatment of patients with severe GAD, using escitalopram (10-20 mg) as active comparator. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline of the total score on the Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures included rate of response to treatment (at least 50% score reduction from baseline) in the HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety sub-scores, Clinical Global Impression severity and change scores, the Toronto Hospital Alertness Test, the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire Scores. Sixty one clinical centers (Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Slovakia) participated from April 2013 to February 2015. Patient characteristics and demographic data were comparable between treatment groups. Both treatments were associated with a clinically significant decrease in HAM-A total score at week 12; the non-inferiority of agomelatine versus escitalopram was not demonstrated (E(SE) = -0.91(0.69), 95%CI = [-2.26, 0.44], p = 0.195). At week 12, the response rate was 60.9% in the agomelatine group, and 64.8% in the escitalopram group. In both treatment arms, HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety scores decreased, alertness and sleep parameters improved, and ability to experience pleasure increased. In these secondary outcome measures, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Agomelatine was well-tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events than escitalopram. Agomelatine and escitalopram are efficacious in treating GAD patients with severe symptoms.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Semmelweis University Balassa u 6 H 1083 Budapest Hungary
Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier 50 rue Carnot 92284 Suresnes Cedex France
Mehilainen Clinic Runeberginkatu 47 A 00260 Helsinki Finland
National Institute of Mental Health Topolová 748 250 67 Klecany Czechia
Private Psychiatric Practice Vavrušová Consulting s r o Záporožská 12 851 01 Bratislava Slovakia
Toowong Specialist Clinic Level 2 54 Jephson Street Toowong QLD 4066 Australia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org