In the modern era, molecular genetic techniques are crucial in ecological studies, as well as in the classification, typing, and phylogenetic analysis of prokaryotes. These techniques are mainly aimed at whole genome comparisons and PCR-derived experiments, including amplifying the 16S rRNA and other various housekeeping genes used in taxonomy, as well as MLST (multilocus sequence typing) and MLSA (multilocus sequence analysis) of different taxonomic bacterial groups. The gene encoding threonine-tRNA ligase (thrS) is a gene potentially applicable as an identification and phylogenetic marker in bacteria. It is widely distributed in bacterial genomes and is subject to evolutionary selection pressure due to its important function in protein synthesis. In this study, specific primers were used to amplify a thrS gene fragment (~740 bp) in 36 type and 30 wild strains classified under family Bifidobacteriaceae. The full-length gene has not yet been considered as a possible identification, classification, and phylogenetic marker in bifidobacteria. The thrS sequences revealed higher sequence variability (82.7% of pairwise identities) among members of the family than that shown by 16S rRNA gene sequences (96.0%). Although discrepancies were found between the thrS-derived and previously reported whole genome phylogenetic analyses, the main phylogenetic groups of bifidobacteria were properly assigned. Most wild strains of bifidobacteria were better differentiated based on their thrS sequences than on their 16S rRNA gene identities. Phylogenetic confidence of the evaluated gene with respect to other alternative genetic markers widely used in taxonomy of bifidobacteria (fusA, GroELhsp60, pyrG, and rplB genes) was confirmed using the localized incongruence difference - Templeton analysis.

Czech University of Life Sciences Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources Department of Microbiology Nutrition and Dietetics Kamýcká 129 165 00 Czechia

Food Research Institute Prague Radiová 1285 7 102 00 Czechia

Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences Vídeňská 1083 142 20 Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014 May 27;64(9):2932-2938 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Oct;80(20):6383-94 PubMed

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57923 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006 Dec;56(Pt 12):2783-92 PubMed

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 17;8(10):e77033 PubMed

Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010 Nov;33(7):359-66 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Oct;80(20):6290-302 PubMed

Res Microbiol. 2010 Mar;161(2):82-90 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997 Sep 15;154(2):377-83 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 May;52(Pt 3):809-12 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007 Jan;57(Pt 1):81-91 PubMed

Infect Genet Evol. 2013 Dec;20:188-96 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013 Nov;63(Pt 11):4350-3 PubMed

Nutr Rev. 2009 Feb;67(2):77-82 PubMed

Curr Microbiol. 2017 Nov;74(11):1324-1331 PubMed

Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9 PubMed

Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013 Feb;36(1):11-6 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Nov;69(11):6908-22 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1991 Jan;173(2):697-703 PubMed

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2005;41(4):355-60 PubMed

Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000 Mar;64(1):202-36 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001 Sep;51(Pt 5):1633-8 PubMed

PLoS One. 2015 Feb 06;10(2):e0117912 PubMed

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;33(4):537-44 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000 Oct 1;191(1):17-24 PubMed

BMC Genomics. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):568 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001 Jan;25(1):39-67 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Sep 1;149(1):88-105 PubMed

Behav Brain Res. 2015;287:59-72 PubMed

BMC Microbiol. 2016 Jun 21;16(1):117 PubMed

BMC Microbiol. 2007 Aug 21;7:79 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 Dec;78(3):617-28 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017 Jul;67(7):2349-2356 PubMed

Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996 Jan;46(1):102-11 PubMed

Microbiologyopen. 2018 Aug;7(4):e00579 PubMed

Syst Appl Microbiol. 2015 Jun;38(4):237-45 PubMed

Syst Biol. 2007 Aug;56(4):564-77 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017 Jul;67(7):2403-2411 PubMed

Glutamine synthetase type I (glnAI) represents a rewarding molecular marker in the classification of bifidobacteria and related genera