Classification of Culturable Bifidobacterial Population from Colonic Samples of Wild Pigs (Sus scrofa) Based on Three Molecular Genetic Methods

. 2017 Nov ; 74 (11) : 1324-1331. [epub] 20170729

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid28756573
Odkazy

PubMed 28756573
DOI 10.1007/s00284-017-1320-0
PII: 10.1007/s00284-017-1320-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Occurrence of bifidobacteria, known as health-promoting probiotic microorganisms, in the digestive tract of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) has not been examined yet. One hundred forty-nine fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase positive bacterial strains were isolated from colonic content of twenty-two individuals of wild pigs originated from four localities in the Czechia. Based on PCR-DGGE technique targeting the variable V3 region of the 16S rRNA genes, strains were initially differentiated into four groups represented by: (i) probably a new Bifidobacterium species (89 strains), (ii) B. boum/B. thermophilum/B. thermacidophilum subsp. porcinum/B. thermacidophilum subsp. thermacidophilum (sub)species (49 strains), (iii) Pseudoscardovia suis (7 strains), and (iv) B. pseudolongum subsp. globosum/B. pseudolongum subsp. pseudolongum (4 strains), respectively. Given the fact that DGGE technique did not allow to differentiate the representatives of thermophilic bifidobacteria and B. pseudolongum subspecies, strains were further classified by the 16S rRNA and thrS gene sequences. Primers targeting the variable regions of the latter gene were designed to be applicable in identification and phylogeny of Bifidobacteriaceae family. The 16S rRNA-derived phylogenetic study classified members of the first group into five subgroups in a separated cluster of thermophilic bifidobacteria. Comparable results were obtained by the thrS-derived phylogenetic analysis. Remarkably, variability among thrS sequences was higher compared with 16S rRNA gene sequences. Overall, molecular genetic techniques application allowed to identify a new Bifidobacterium phylotype which is predominant in the digestive tract of examined wild pigs.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):540-52 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014 May 27;64(9):2932-2938 PubMed

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000 Jan;30(1):61-7 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003 Sep;53(Pt 5):1619-23 PubMed

Syst Appl Microbiol. 2012 Mar;35(2):92-7 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Mar;54(Pt 2):401-6 PubMed

Nutr Rev. 2009 Feb;67(2):77-82 PubMed

PLoS Biol. 2010 Nov 16;8(11):e1000546 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014 Feb;64(Pt 2):346-51 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Nov;66(11):4705-14 PubMed

J Microbiol Methods. 2000 May;40(3):221-4 PubMed

Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9 PubMed

Syst Appl Microbiol. 2013 Feb;36(1):11-6 PubMed

Syst Appl Microbiol. 2015 Jul;38(5):305-14 PubMed

Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1998 Jan;73(1):127-41 PubMed

Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008 Mar;72(3):742-8 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 1994 Dec;24(1-2):199-210 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Feb;74(3):575-84 PubMed

J Microbiol Methods. 2000 Dec 15;43(2):127-32 PubMed

World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 7;21(29):8787-803 PubMed

Microbiome. 2015 Jun 22;3:26 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 2003 Apr;185(8):2571-81 PubMed

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;33(4):537-44 PubMed

Anaerobe. 2004 Feb;10(1):33-9 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013 Dec;63(Pt 12):4439-46 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(4):325-8 PubMed

BMC Microbiol. 2016 Jun 21;16(1):117 PubMed

BMC Microbiol. 2007 Aug 21;7:79 PubMed

Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012 Mar;62(Pt 3):716-21 PubMed

J Food Prot. 2006 Apr;69(4):871-7 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Jan;69(1):654-8 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 2007 Feb;189(4):1330-41 PubMed

Anaerobe. 2017 Apr;44:40-47 PubMed

Anaerobe. 2010 Apr;16(2):165-70 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...