Distribution of bifidobacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of calves
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
17007437
DOI
10.1007/bf02931825
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Bifidobacterium genetika růst a vývoj izolace a purifikace MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- feces mikrobiologie MeSH
- gastrointestinální trakt mikrobiologie MeSH
- hybridizace in situ fluorescenční MeSH
- kojená zvířata mikrobiologie MeSH
- počet mikrobiálních kolonií MeSH
- skot MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- skot MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Development of gastrointestinal microflora of calves with special reference to bifidobacteria was investigated; fecal bacteria were enumerated in calves aged 3 days to 7 weeks. Bacteria were detected by using selective media, bifidobacteria using modified TPY agar with an addition of mupirocin and acetic acid and by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Bifidobacteria were dominant group of fecal flora of calves after 7 d of life, constituting 10 % of total bacterial counts. The highest bacterial concentrations were observed in rumen, cecum, and colon, the lowest in abomasum and duodenum. Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli exhibited the highest survival ability during stomach passage and dominated in all parts of the digestive tract. Bifidobacteria counts determined by FISH were significantly higher than those provided by cultivation. Modified TPY agar was highly selective and suitable for bifidobacteria isolation but FISH was shown to be a more precise method for their enumeration. Our results show that gastrointestinal microflora of calves in the milk-feeding period is similar to breast-fed infants with respect to the occurrence of bifidobacteria as a dominant bacterial group. The use of Bifidobacterium strains offers a promising way for providing beneficial effectors for calves in the milk-feeding period.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(4):479-83 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Feb 15;243(2):417-23 PubMed
Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2003 Sep;91(441):56-63 PubMed
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;82(1-4):341-52 PubMed
J Pathol Bacteriol. 1965 Oct;90(2):495-513 PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2000 May;40(3):221-4 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Sep;68(9):4689-93 PubMed
Br J Nutr. 2004 Jul;92(1):81-6 PubMed
J Dairy Sci. 1995 Dec;78(12):2838-46 PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2000 Dec 15;43(2):127-32 PubMed
Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11(1):75-90 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 May;45(5):1513-8 PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2005 Mar;60(3):365-73 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004 Nov 15;240(2):131-6 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):209-12 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(5):587-90 PubMed
Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2003 Sep;91(441):48-55 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):203-7 PubMed
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001 Jan;55(1):19-28 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):143-6 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Oct;32(4):470-3 PubMed
Survival of bifidobacteria administered to calves
Auto-aggregation and co-aggregation ability in bifidobacteria and clostridia
Comparison of intestinal microflora in healthy infants and infants with allergic colitis