Survival of bifidobacteria administered to calves
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky farmakologie MeSH
- Bacteria klasifikace izolace a purifikace MeSH
- Bifidobacterium účinky léků metabolismus fyziologie MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- DNA bakterií genetika MeSH
- feces mikrobiologie MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- gastrointestinální trakt mikrobiologie MeSH
- hybridizace in situ MeSH
- mikrobiální testy citlivosti MeSH
- mikrobiální viabilita * MeSH
- počet mikrobiálních kolonií MeSH
- probiotika aplikace a dávkování izolace a purifikace MeSH
- shluková analýza MeSH
- skot mikrobiologie MeSH
- techniky typizace bakterií MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- skot mikrobiologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antibakteriální látky MeSH
- DNA bakterií MeSH
Twenty-five bifidobacteria were isolated from feces of calves. Isolates were identified, and their functional properties and antimicrobial activity were determined. From 10 strains with suitable properties rifampicin-resistant mutants (RRBs) were prepared and mixture of RRBs was administered to 2-d-old calves. These strains were identified by sequencing as Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. animalis (6 strains), B. thermophilum (2 strains), B. choerinum (1 strain) and B. longum ssp. suis (1 strain). The control group was without probiotic treatment. Survival ability of administered bifidobacteria was monitored in fecal samples by cultivation on modified TPY agar supplemented with mupirocin, acetic acid, and rifampicin. Administered bifidobacteria survived in gastrointestinal tract of calves for at least 60 d. Other bacteria were also determined after cultivation using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli dominated in fecal microflora. Significantly lower amounts of E. coli and higher amounts of bifidobacteria and total anaerobes were found in the treated group relative to the control group.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Jun;45(1):91-5 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000 Oct 1;191(1):17-24 PubMed
Anaerobe. 2010 Apr;16(2):165-70 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(4):325-8 PubMed
Arch Anim Nutr. 2005 Dec;59(6):419-27 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2008;53(3):263-9 PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 2007 Apr 15;121(3-4):299-306 PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2000 Dec 15;43(2):127-32 PubMed
Avian Pathol. 2003 Aug;32(4):403-11 PubMed
Arch Anim Nutr. 2008 Oct;62(5):359-65 PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2000 May;40(3):221-4 PubMed
World Rev Nutr Diet. 1992;67:40-113 PubMed