Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is diagnosed in up to 30% patients after anaesthesia. The causative role of anaesthetic toxicity remains unclear. Using clinical tests, no clear-cut differences have been observed between anaesthetics so far. The aim of this trial was to compare the incidence of POCD diagnosed by a battery of neuropsychologic tests after propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia. Secondary goal was to examine possible relationship between POCD positivity and changes in auditory event-related potentials (ERPs). Sixty patients undergoing lumbar discectomy were prospectively randomized to receive depth-controlled sevoflurane (SEVO) or propofol (PROP) based anaesthesia. The neuropsychological examination and auditory event-related potentials (N1, P3a and P3b components) recording was performed preoperatively and on days 1, 6 and 42 after surgery. POCD was defined as a decline of more than one standard deviation in three or more tests. In 43 patients (20 in PROP and 23 in SEVO group) all selected tests were performed and used for the evaluation. POCD was present in 48%/60%, 18%/20% and 17%/11% (SEVO/PROP) of patients on days 1, 6 and 42 after surgery, with no significant intergroup difference. Among neuropsychologic tests, the most significant decline was observed in Semantic Verbal Fluency and Letter-Number Sequencing Test scores, congruently in both groups on days 1 and 6, with full recovery on the last control. Transient deteriorations in other tests were observed as well. No association of POCD positivity and ERPs changes was found, although long-term modifications of P3a and P3b components were observed, mainly in SEVO group. In our study, sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia was associated with the similar incidence of POCD. Cognitive decline, mainly affecting executive functions, was temporary in most of the patients. Prolonged ERPs alterations after the anaesthesia seem not to have any relationship with the impairment registered by the neuropsychological examination and may represent subclinical changes.

Biomedical Centre Faculty of Medicine in Plzen Charles University Alej Svobody 76 304 60 Plzen Czech Republic

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care The University Hospital and The Faculty of Medicine in Plzen Charles University Alej Svobody 80 304 60 Plzen Czech Republic

Department of Neurology The University Hospital in Plzen Alej Svobody 80 304 60 Plzen Czech Republic

Department of Neurosurgery The University Hospital and The Faculty of Medicine in Plzen Charles University Alej Svobody 80 304 60 Plzen Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):113 PubMed

Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Jun;98(6):456-67 PubMed

Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Aug;103(2):268-81 PubMed

Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1179-85 PubMed

Neurophysiol Clin. 2010 Nov-Dec;40(5-6):255-65 PubMed

Anesthesiology. 2012 Jan;116(1):84-93 PubMed

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Mar;45(3):275-89 PubMed

J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2015 Mar;122(3):375-91 PubMed

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Mar;154(3):433-8 PubMed

Can J Anaesth. 2005 Feb;52(2):137-42 PubMed

Neuroimage. 2009 Mar 1;45(1):191-7 PubMed

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jul;22(7):492-9 PubMed

Acta Neurol Scand. 1993 May;87(5):423-7 PubMed

Lancet. 1998 Mar 21;351(9106):857-61 PubMed

Anesthesiology. 2008 Jan;108(1):18-30 PubMed

Anesthesiology. 2004 Mar;100(3):617-25 PubMed

Anaesthesia. 1988 Mar;43 Suppl:14-7 PubMed

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Mar;47(3):260-6 PubMed

Anaesthesia. 2011 Jun;66(6):455-64 PubMed

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2031-46 PubMed

Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jun;106(6):840-50 PubMed

Br J Anaesth. 1995 Jun;74(6):674-80 PubMed

Anaesthesia. 2017 Jun;72(6):682-685 PubMed

Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jan;129(1):246-253 PubMed