Genetic constraints of population expansion of the Carpathian lynx at the western edge of its native distribution range in Central Europe
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
EHP-CZ02-OV-1-022-2015
EEA Grants (European Economic Area Grants) - International
EHP-CZ02-OV-1-022-2015
EEA Grants (European Economic Area Grants) - International
PubMed
30470785
PubMed Central
PMC6781145
DOI
10.1038/s41437-018-0167-x
PII: 10.1038/s41437-018-0167-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chov MeSH
- inbreeding MeSH
- Lynx genetika fyziologie MeSH
- masožravci MeSH
- populační genetika MeSH
- rozšíření zvířat * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
Even though populations of many large carnivores are expanding throughout Europe, the Eurasian lynx population in the Western Carpathians seems unable to spread beyond the western boundaries of its current distributional range. Many factors, both extrinsic and intrinsic, can influence the potential for range expansion: landscape fragmentation, natal philopatry, low natural fecundity and high mortality, and low and sex-biased dispersal rates. In this study we used non-invasive genetic sampling to determine population size fluctuation, sub-structuring and social organisation of the peripheral lynx population at the Czech-Slovak border. Even though the population size has been relatively stable over the period studied (2010-2016), the individual inbreeding coefficients of residents at the end of the study were much higher than those of founders at the beginning of the study. While non-resident individuals (predominantly males) occurred regularly in the study population, only resident individuals with well-established home ranges participated in breeding and produced offspring. Almost half the offspring detected in the study (predominantly females) settled in or near the natal area. Subsequent incestuous mating resulted in production of inbred individuals, reduction of effective population size of the population, and sub-structuring of the population through formation of two distinct family lineages. Our study illustrates how social constraints, such as territoriality, breeding of residents and natal philopatry of females, lead to incestuous mating in small-sized populations, especially at the periphery of their distribution. This threat should be taken into account in planning of conservation and population recovery of species with similar social structure.
Friends of the Earth Czech Republic Olomouc branch Dolní náměstí 38 779 00 Olomouc Czech Republic
Institute of Vertebrate Biology of the Czech Academy of Sciences Květná 8 603 65 Brno Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Anděra M, Červený J. Large mammals in the Czech Republic. Distribution, history and protection. 2. Carnivores (Carnivora) Prague: National Museum; 2009.
Anderson PK. Dispersal in rodents: a resident fitness hypothesis. Spec Publ, Am Soc Mammal. 1989;9:viii+141.
Andersen R, Odden J, Linnell JDC, Herfindal I, Panzacchi M, Høgseth Ø et al. (2005) Gaupe og rådyr i Sørøst-Norge. Oversikt over gjennomførte aktiviteter 1995–2004. NINA Rapport 29, Trondheim, Norway [in Norwegian with English summary]
Augustine J, Miquelle DG, Korkishko VG. Preliminary results of the Far Eastern leopard ecology project: implications for conservation and management. Zov Taigi. 1996;4:6–11.
Balme G, Slotow R, Hunter LTB. Impact of conservation interventions on the dynamics and persistence of a persecuted leopard (Panthera pardus) population. Biol Conserv. 2009;142:2681–2690.
Barone MA, Roelke ME, Howard JG, Brown JL, Anderson AE, Wildt DE. Reproductive characteristics of male Florida panthers: comparative studies from Florida, Texas, Colorado, Latin America, and North American zoos. J Mammal. 1994;75:150–162.
Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Montpellier, France: Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II; 1996.
Breitenmoser-Würsten Ch, Zimmermann F, Molinari-Jobin A, Molinari P, Capt S, Vandel JM, et al. Spatial and social stability of Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx population: an assessment of 10 years of observation in the Jura Mountains. Wildl Biol. 2007;13:365–380.
Broquet T, Petit E. Quantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics. Mol Ecol. 2004;13:3601–3608. PubMed
Červený J, Koubek P (2003) The brown bear in the Czech Republic. In: Kryštůfek B, Flajšman B, Griffiths HI (eds) Living with bears: a large European carnivore in a shrinking world. Ecological Forum of the Liberal Democracy of Slovenia, Ljubljana, pp. 245–257
Channell R, Lomolino MV. Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species. Nature. 2000;403:84–86. PubMed
Chapron G, Kaczensky P, Linnell JD, von Arx M, Huber D, Andrén H, et al. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science. 2014;346:1517–1519. PubMed
Davoli F, Schmidt K, Kowalczyk R, Randi E. Hair snaring and molecular genetic identification for reconstructing the spatial structure of Eurasian lynx populations. Mammal Biol. 2013;78:118–126.
De Barba M, Waits LP, Garton EO, Genovesi P, Randi E, Mustoni A, et al. The power of genetic monitoring for studying demography, ecology and genetics of a reintroduced brown bear population. Mol Ecol. 2010;19:3938–3951. PubMed
Do C, Waples RS, Peel D, Macbeth GM, Tullett BJ, Ovenden JR. NeEstimatorv2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014;14:209–214. PubMed
Dobson FS. Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Anim Behav. 1982;30:1183–1192.
Earl DA, von Holdt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4:359–361.
Ebert C, Knauer F, Storch I, Hohmann U. Individual heterogeneity as a pitfall in population estimates based on non-invasive genetic sampling: a review and recommendations. Wildl Biol. 2010;16:225–240.
Eckert CG, Samis KE, Lougheed SC. Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central–marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol Ecol. 2008;17:1170–1188. PubMed
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:2611–2620. PubMed
Fattebert J, Balme G, Dickerson T, Slotow R, Hunter L. Density-dependent natal dispersal patterns in a leopard population recovering from over-harvest. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0122355. PubMed PMC
Fattebert J, Robinson HS, Balme G, Slotow R, Hunter L. Structural habitat predicts functional dispersal habitat of a large carnivore: how leopards change spots. Ecol Appl. 2015;25:1911–1921. PubMed
Fernández J, Toro MA. A new method to estimate relatedness from molecular markers. Mol Ecol. 2006;15:657–667. PubMed
Ferreras P, Delibes M, Palomares F, Fedriani JM, Calzada J, Revilla E. Proximate and ultimate causes of dispersal in the Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus. Behav Ecol. 2004;15:31–40.
Frankham R. Genetics and extinction. Biol Conserv. 2005;126:131–140.
Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Updated from Goudet (1995).
Gour DS, Bhagavatula J, Bhavanishankar M, Reddy PA, Gupta JA, Sarkar MS, et al. Philopatry and dispersal patterns in tiger (Panthera tigris) PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e66956. PubMed PMC
Greenwood PJ. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav. 1980;28:1140–1162.
Hampe A, Petit RJ. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett. 2005;8:461–467. PubMed
Hardie DC, Hutchinson JA. Evolutionary ecology at the extremes of species’ ranges. Environ Rev. 2010;18:1–20.
Hell P, Slamečka J (1996) Current status of the lynx (Lynx lynx) in Slovakia. In: Koubek P, Červený J (eds) Lynx in the Czech and Slovak Republics, Vol. 30. Acta Sc Nat, Brno, pp. 64–78
Hell P, Slamečka J, Gašparík J (2004) Rys a divá mačka v slovenských Karpatoch a vo svete. PaRPress, Bratislava (in Slovak)
Holt RD, Keitt TH, Lewis MA, Maurer BA, Taper ML. Theoretical models of species’ borders: single species approaches. Oikos. 2005;108:18–27.
Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1801–1806. PubMed
Janečka JE, Blankenship TL, Hirth DH, Kilpatrick CW, Tewes ME, Grassman LIJ. Evidence for male-biased dispersal in bobcats Lynx rufus using relatedness analysis. Wildl Biol. 2007;13:38–47.
Janečka JE, Blankenship TL, Hirth DH, Tewes ME, Kilpatrick CW, Grassman LIJ. Kinship and social structure of bobcats (Lynx rufus) inferred from microsatellite and radio-telemetry data. J Zool. 2006;269:494–501.
Janečka JE, Tewes ME, Laack LL, Caso A, Grassman LI, Jr, Haines AM, Shindle DB, Davis BW, Murphy WJ, Honeycutt RL. Reduced genetic diversity and isolation of remnant ocelot populations occupying a severely fragmented landscape in southern Texas. Anim Conserv. 2011;14:608–619.
Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B, Okarma H, Schmidt K, Bunevich AN, Milkowski L. Population dynamics (1869-1994), demography, and home ranges of the lynx in Białowieza primeval forest (Poland and Belarus) Ecography. 1996;19:122–138.
Johnson WE, Onorato DP, Roelke ME, et al. Genetic restoration of the Florida panther. Science. 2010;329:1641–1645. PubMed PMC
Jones OR, Wang J. COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Mol Ecol Res. 2010;10:551–555. PubMed
Jorde PE, Ryman N. Unbiased estimator for genetic drift and effective population size. Genetics. 2007;177:927–935. PubMed PMC
Kaczensky P, Chapron G, von Arx M, Huber D, Andrén H, Linnell J (eds) (2013). Status, management and distribution of large carnivores—bear, lynx, wolf and wolverine—in Europe. Part 1, Report for the EU Commission, 72pp.
Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol. 2007;16:1099–1106. PubMed
Kalinowski ST, Wagner AP, Taper ML. ML-Relate: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6:576–579.
Keller LF, Waller DM. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:230–241.
Kunc L (1996) Lynx (Lynx lynx) in the Moravskoslezské Beskydy Mts. In: Koubek P, Červený J (eds), Lynx in the Czech and Slovak Republics, Vol. 30. Acta Sci Nat, Brno, pp. 58–63
Kratochvíl J. Recent distribution of the lynx in Europe. Acta Sci Nat, Brno. 1968;5/6:1–74.
Kratochvíl J, Vala F (1968) History occurrence of the lynx in Bohemia and Moravia. In: Kratochvíl J (ed) History of the distribution of the lynx in Europe. Acta Sci Nat, Brno, 50pp.
Krojerová J, Barančeková M, Homolka M, Koubek P (2014) Monitoring of large carnivores in SCI Beskydy. A final report for the State Conservation Agency, 152pp. (in Czech)
Kubala J, Smolko P, Zimmermann F, Rigg R, Tám B, Iľko T et al. (2017) Robust monitoring of the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx in the Slovak Carpathians reveals lower numbers than officially reported. Oryx: 1–9. 10.1017/S003060531700076X
Lambin X, Aars J, Piertney SB (2001) Dispersal, intraspecific competition, kin competition and kin facilitation: a review of the empirical evidence. In: Clobert ED, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal: individual, population, and community. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 110–122
Linnell JDC, Salvatori V, Boitani L (2008). Guidelines for population level management plans for large carnivores. A Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe report prepared for the European Commission, 85pp.
Linnell JDC, Swenson JE, Landa A, Kvam T. Methods for monitoring European large carnivores. A worldwide review of relevant experience. Nina Oppdragsmeld. 1989;549:1–38.
Lucena-Perez M, Soriano L, López-Bao JV, Marmesat E, Fernández L, Palomares F, Godoy JA. Reproductive biology and genealogy in the endangered Iberian lynx: Implications for conservation. Mammal Biol. 2018;89:7–13.
Maehr DS, Land ED, Shindle DB, Bass OL, Hoctor TS. Florida panther dispersal and conservation. Biol Conserv. 2002;106:187–97.
McDaniel GW, McKelvey KS, Squires JR, Ruggiero LF. Efficacy of lures and hair snares to detect lynx. Wildl Soc Bull. 2000;28:119–123.
Miller CR, Joyce P, Waits LP. A new method for estimating the size of small populations from genetic mark—recapture data. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:1991–2005. PubMed
Milligan BG. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness. Genetics. 2003;163:1153–1167. PubMed PMC
Mills LS, Citta JJ, Lair KP, Schwartz MK, Tallmon DA. Estimating animal abundance using noninvasive DNA sampling: promise and pitfalls. Ecol Appl. 2000;10:283–294.
Müller J, Wölfl M, Wölfl S, Müller DWH, Hothorn T, Heurich M. Protected areas shape the spatial distribution of a European lynx population more than 20 years after reintroduction. Biol Conserv. 2014;177:210–217.
Nei M, Tajima F. Genetic drift and estimation of effective population size. Genetics. 1981;98:625–640. PubMed PMC
Newman D, Pilson D. Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: experimental populations of Clarkia pulchella. Evolution. 1997;51:354–362. PubMed
Onorato D, Desimone R, White C, Waits LP. Genetic assessment of paternity and relatedness in a managed population of cougars. J Wildl Manag. 2011;75:378–384.
Paetkau DW. The optimal number of markers in genetic capture-mark-recapture studies. J Wildl Manag. 2005;68:449–452.
Paetkau D, Strobeck C. Microsatellite analysis of genetic variation in black bear populations. Mol Ecol. 1994;3:489–495. PubMed
Pesenti E, Zimmermann F. Density estimations of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in the Swiss Alps. J Mammal. 2013;94:73–81.
Pironon Samuel, Papuga Guillaume, Villellas Jesús, Angert Amy L., García María B., Thompson John D. Geographic variation in genetic and demographic performance: new insights from an old biogeographical paradigm. Biological Reviews. 2016;92(4):1877–1909. PubMed
Podgórski T, Schmidt K, Kowalczyk R, Gulczyñska A. Microhabitat selection by Eurasian lynx and its implications for species conservation. Acta Theriol. 2008;53:97–110.
Pollak E. A new method for estimating the effective population size from allele frequency changes. Genetics. 1983;1041:531–548. PubMed PMC
Pusey A, Wolf M. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:201–206. PubMed
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945–959. PubMed PMC
Ratkiewicz M, Matosiuk M, Kowalczyk R, Konopin MK, Okarma H, Ozolins J. High levels of population differentiation in Eurasian lynx at the edge of the species’ western range in Europe revealed by mitochondrial DNA analyses. Anim Conserv. 2012;15:603–612.
Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered. 1995;86:248–249.
Rice WR. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution. 1989;43:223–225. PubMed
Riester M, Stadler PF, Klemm K. FRANz: reconstruction of wild multi-generation pedigrees. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2134–2139. PubMed PMC
Ritland K. Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genet Res. 1996;67:175–185.
Rodríguez-Ramilo ST, Toro MA, Fernández J. Assessing population genetic structure via the maximisation of the genetic distance. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41:49. PubMed PMC
Rodríguez-Ramilo ST, Wang J. The effect of close relatives on unsupervised Bayesian clustering algorithms in population genetic structure analysis. Mol Ecol Res. 2012;12:873–884. PubMed
Rodríguez-Ramilo ST, Toro MA, Wang J, Fernández J. Improving the inference of population genetic structure in the presence of related individuals. Genet Res. 2014;96:e003. PubMed PMC
Roelke ME, Martenson JS, O’Brien SJ. The consequences of demographic reduction and genetic depletion in the endangered Florida panther. Curr Biol. 1993;3:340–350. PubMed
Rosenberg NA. DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004;4:137–138.
Schmidt K. Maternal behaviour and juvenile dispersal in the Eurasian lynx. Acta Theriol. 1998;43:391–408.
Schmidt K, Davoli F, Kowalczyk R, Randi E. Does kinship affect spatial organization in a small and isolated population of a solitary felid: the Eurasian lynx? Integr Zool. 2016;11:334–349. PubMed
Schmidt K, Kowalczyk R. Using scent-marking stations to collect hair samples to monitor Eurasian lynx populations. Wildl Soc Bull. 2006;34:462–466.
Schmidt K, Ratkiewicz M, Konopinski MK. The importance of genetic variability and population differentiation in the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx for conservation, in the context of habitat and climate change. Mammal Rev. 2011;41:112–124.
Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Waples RS. Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22:25–33. PubMed
Sindičić M, Polanc P, Gomerčić T, Jelenčič M, Huber Đ, Trontelj P, Skrbinšek T. Genetic data confirm critical status of the reintroduced Dinaric population of Eurasian lynx. Conserv Genet. 2013;14:1009–1018.
Spong G, Hellborg L. A near: extinction event in lynx: do microsatellite data tell the tale? Conserv Ecol. 2002;6:15.
Stratman MR, Alden CD, Pelton MR, Sunquist ME. Long distance movement of a Florida black bear in the southeastern coastal plain. Ursus. 2001;12:55–58.
Sugimoto T, Aramilev VV, Kerley LL, Nagata J, Miquelle DG, McCullough DR. Noninvasive genetic analyses for estimating population size and genetic diversity of the remaining Far Eastern leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis) population. Conserv Genet. 2014;15:521–532.
Sunquist ME, Sunquist FC. Wild cats of the world. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 2002. p. 452.
Swenson JE, Sandegren F, Söderberg A. Geographic expansion of an increasing brown bear population: evidence for presaturation dispersal. J Anim Ecol. 1998;67:819–826.
Taberlet P, Griffin S, Goossens B, Questiau S, Manceau V, Escaravage N, et al. Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;26:3189–3194. PubMed PMC
Taberlet P, Waits LP, Luikart G. Non-invasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999;14:323–327. PubMed
Valiére N. GIMLET: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Mol Ecol Notes. 2002;2:377–379.
Velando Alberto, Morán Paloma, Romero Rafael, Fernández Jesús, Piorno Vicente. Invasion and eradication of the American mink in the Atlantic Islands National Park (NW Spain): a retrospective analysis. Biological Invasions. 2016;19(4):1227–1241.
von Arx M, Breitenmoser-Würsten Ch, Zimmermann F, Breitenmoser U (2004) Status and conservation of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe in 2001. KORA Bericht Nr. 19e. KORA, Muri, Switzerland
Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P. Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol Ecol. 2001;10:249–256. PubMed
Waits LP, Paetkau D. Non-invasive genetic sampling tools for wildlife biologists: a review of applications and recommendations for accurate data collection. J Wildl Manag. 2005;69:1419–1433.
Wang J. Informativeness of genetic markers for pairwise relationship and relatedness inference. Theor Popul Biol. 2006;70:300–321. PubMed
Wang J. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. Genet Res. 2007;89:135–153. PubMed
Wang J. A new method for estimating effective population sizes from a single sample of multilocus genotypes. Mol Ecol. 2009;18:2148–2164. PubMed
Wang J. Coancestry: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Mol Ecol Res. 2011;11:141–145. PubMed
Waples RS. A bias correction for estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium at unlinked gene loci. Conserv Genet. 2006;7:167–184.
Waples RS, Antao T, Luikart G. Effects of overlapping generations on linkage disequilibrium estimates of effective population size. Genetics. 2014;197:769–780. PubMed PMC
Waples RS, Do C. Linkage disequilibrium estimates of contemporary Ne using highly variable genetic markers: a largely untapped resource for applied conservation and evolution. Evol Appl. 2010;3:244–262. PubMed PMC
Weingarth K, Heibl C, Knauer F, Zimmermann F, Bufka L, Heurich M. First estimation of Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) abundance and density using digital cameras and capture–recapture techniques in a German national park. Anim Biodivers Conserv. 2012;35:197–207.
Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984;38:1358–1370. PubMed
Weissmannová H (2004) Ostravsko. In: Mackovčin P, Sedláček M (eds) Chráněná území ČR. AOPK ČR, EkoCentrum Brno, Praha (in Czech)
Wultsch Claudia, Caragiulo Anthony, Dias-Freedman Isabela, Quigley Howard, Rabinowitz Salisa, Amato George. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Mesoamerican Jaguars (Panthera onca): Implications for Conservation and Management. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0162377. PubMed PMC
Zimmermann F, Breitenmoser-Würsten Ch, Breitenmoser U. Natal dispersal of Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Switzerland. J Zool. 2005;267(4):381–395.
Survival of Eurasian lynx in the human-dominated landscape of Europe