Small-scale Variation of Testate Amoeba Assemblages: the Effect of Site Heterogeneity and Empty Shell Inclusion

. 2019 May ; 77 (4) : 1014-1024. [epub] 20181123

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid30470844

Grantová podpora
P505/16-03881S Grantová Agentura České Republiky

Odkazy

PubMed 30470844
DOI 10.1007/s00248-018-1292-z
PII: 10.1007/s00248-018-1292-z
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Studies on testate amoeba species distribution at small scales (i.e., single peatland sites) are rare and mostly focus on bogs or mineral-poor Sphagnum fens, leaving spatial patterns within mineral-rich fens completely unexplored. In this study, two mineral-rich fen sites of contrasting groundwater chemistry and moss layer composition were selected for the analysis of testate amoeba compositional variance within a single site. At each study site, samples from 20 randomly chosen moss-dominated plots were collected with several environmental variables being measured at each sampling spot. We also distinguished between empty shells and living individuals to evaluate the effect of empty shell inclusion on recorded species distribution. At the heterogeneous-rich Sphagnum-fen, a clear composition turnover in testate amoebae between Sphagnum-dominated and brown moss-dominated samples was closely related to water pH, temperature and redox potential. We also found notable species composition variance within the homogeneous calcareous fen, yet it was not as high as for the former site and the likely drivers of community assembly remained unidentified. The exclusion of empty shells provided more accurate data on species distribution as well as their relationship with some environmental variables, particularly moisture. Small-scale variability in species composition of communities seems to be a worthwhile aspect in testate amoeba research and should be considered in future sampling strategies along with a possible empty shell bias for more precise understanding of testate amoeba ecology and paleoecology.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jun 1;454-455:211-8 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2011 Feb;61(2):374-85 PubMed

Eur J Protistol. 2014 Oct;50(5):445-55 PubMed

Protist. 1999 Aug;150(2):125-36 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2010 Apr;59(3):499-510 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2010 Jan;59(1):76-83 PubMed

Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 23;6:33907 PubMed

Eur J Protistol. 2018 Apr;63:51-61 PubMed

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 Feb;90(1):182-203 PubMed

ISME J. 2014 May;8(5):1126-34 PubMed

Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 25;5:16931 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2005 Jul;50(1):48-63 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2007 Jul;54(1):91-100 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 22;278(1715):2081-90 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2011 Jul;62(1):80-93 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2014 May;67(4):810-8 PubMed

Can J Microbiol. 2011 Mar;57(3):226-35 PubMed

Microb Ecol. 2000 May;39(4):290-300 PubMed

Eur J Protistol. 2017 Aug;60:13-27 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...