Pollination efficiency of cockroaches and other floral visitors of Clusia blattophila
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
P505-12-P039
Czech Science Foundation
387915
Grant Agency of the Charles University
RVO 67985939
Czech Academy of Sciences
DKRVO 2018/14
Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic
National Museum 00023272
Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic
PubMed
30620429
DOI
10.1111/plb.12956
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Amazonina platystylata, Clusiaceae, Diptera, Gryllidae, pollen load, pollination efficiency, pollinator visitation,
- MeSH
- Clusia anatomy & histology physiology MeSH
- Diptera physiology MeSH
- Gryllidae physiology MeSH
- Flowers anatomy & histology physiology MeSH
- Pollination * physiology MeSH
- Cockroaches * physiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- French Guiana MeSH
Cockroaches have rarely been documented as pollinators. In this paper we examine whether this is because they might be inefficient at pollination compared to other pollinators. Clusia blattophila, a dioecious shrub growing on isolated rocky outcrops in French Guiana, is pollinated by Amazonina platystylata cockroaches and provides a valuable system for the study of cockroach pollination efficiency. We examined the species composition of the visitor guild and visitation rates by means of camcorder recordings and visitor sampling. Then, we investigated the capacity for pollen transfer of principal visitors and found correlations between visitation rates and pollen loads on stigmas. In an exclusion experiment we determined the contributions of individual species to pollination success. Amazonina platystylata, crickets and two species of Diptera transferred pollen, but the number of transferred pollen grains was only related to visitation rates in the case of cockroaches. Crickets visited and rarely carried pollen. Dipterans were as frequent as cockroaches, carried similar pollen loads, but transferred much less pollen. An estimated 41% and 17% of ovules were pollinated by cockroaches and dipterans, respectively. The remaining ovules were not pollinated. There was no spatial variation in pollinator guild composition, but cockroaches visited flowers less frequently at the smaller study site. We demonstrate that cockroaches pollinate a large proportion of ovules. Their pollination service is not confined to one study site and, unlike that provided by dipterans, is not limited to certain years. We suggest that cockroach pollination has been overlooked and that cockroach-pollinated plants, which share certain floral features, possess adaptations to pollination by cockroaches.
Department of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org