Ultra-high-speed videography of resin-dentin interface failure dynamics under tensile load
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
31078308
DOI
10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.006
PII: S0109-5641(18)31055-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Crack propagation, Dental adhesive systems, Failure mode, Fractographic analysis, Micro-tensile bond-strength test, Ultra-high-speed videography,
- MeSH
- Dentin MeSH
- Dentin-Bonding Agents * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Stress, Mechanical MeSH
- Microscopy, Electron, Scanning MeSH
- Tensile Strength MeSH
- Surface Properties MeSH
- Resin Cements MeSH
- Composite Resins MeSH
- Materials Testing MeSH
- Dental Bonding * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Dentin-Bonding Agents * MeSH
- Resin Cements MeSH
- Composite Resins MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Ultra-high-speed (UHS) videography was used to visualize the fracture phenomena at the resin-dentin interface during micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) test. We also investigated whether UHS videography is applicable for failure-mode analysis. METHODS: Ten human mid-coronal dentin surfaces were bonded using Clearfil SE Bond either in self-etching (SE) or etch-and-rinse (ER) mode. After 24-h water storage, the samples were cut into beams for μTBS test and tested at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. The fracture phenomena at the bonded interface were captured using a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor digital UHS camera at 299,166 frames per second. The failure modes were classified using UHS videography, followed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The failure-mode distributions determined by UHS videography and SEM analysis were statistically analyzed using Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The crack-propagation speed exceeded 1,500 km/h. No significant difference was found between the SEM and UHS videography failure-mode distributions in the SE mode. A significant difference appeared between them in the ER mode. Significant differences in the incidence of cohesive failures within the adhesive and at the adhesive-composite interface between the SE and ER modes were identified by both SEM and UHS videography. SIGNIFICANCE: UHS videography enabled visualization of the fracture dynamics at the resin- dentin interfaces under tensile load. However, the resolution at such high frame rate was insufficient to classify the failure mode as precisely as that of SEM. Nevertheless, UHS videography can provide more detailed information about the fracture origin and propagation.
References provided by Crossref.org