Minute ventilation stabilization during all pressure-control / support mechanical ventilation modes

. 2020 Apr 30 ; 69 (2) : 275-282. [epub] 20200323

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid32199006

The main goal of our prospective randomized study was comparing compare the effectiveness of ventilation control method "Automatic proportional minute ventilation (APMV) "versus manually set pressure control ventilation modes in relationship to lung mechanics and gas exchange. 80 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were randomized into 2 groups. 40 patients in the first group No.1 (APMV group) were ventilated with pressure control (PCV) or pressure support ventilation (PSV) mode with APMV control. The other 40 patients (control group No.2) were ventilated with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV-p) or pressure control modes (PCV) without APMV. Ventilation control with APMV was able to maintain minute ventilation more precisely in comparison with manual control (p<0.01), similarly deviations of ETCO(2) were significantly lower (p<0.01). The number of manual corrections of ventilation settings was significantly lower when APMV was used (p<0.01). The differences in lung mechanics and hemodynamics were not statistically significant. Ventilation using APMV is more precise in maintaining minute ventilation and gas exchange compared with manual settings. It required less staff intervention, while respiratory system mechanics and hemodynamics are comparable. APMV showed as effective and safe method applicable on top of all pressure control ventilation modes.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

ARNAL J-M, GARNERO A, NOVONTI D, DEMORY D, DUCROS L, BERRIC A, DONATI S, CORNO G, JABER S, DURAND-GASSELIN J. Feasibility study on full closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV™) in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational comparative study. Critical care (London, England) 2013;17:R196–R196. doi: 10.1186/cc12890. PubMed DOI PMC

CAMPBELL RS, DAVIS BR. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation: does it matter? Respir Care. 2002;47:416–424. discussion 424–426. PubMed

CANDIK P, RYBAR D, DEPTA F, SABOL F, KOLESAR A, GALKOVA K, TOROK P, DONICOVA V, IMRECZE S, NOSAL M, DONIC V. Relationship between dynamic expiratory time constant tau(edyn) and parameters of breathing cycle in pressure support ventilation mode. Physiological Research. 2018;67:875–879. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.933750. PubMed DOI

CLAVIERAS N, WYSOCKI M, COISEL Y, GALIA F, CONSEIL M, CHANQUES G, JUNG B, ARNAL JM, MATECKI S, MOLINARI N, JABER S. Prospective randomized crossover study of a new closed-loop control system versus pressure support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:631–641. doi: 10.1097/aln.0b013e3182952608. PubMed DOI

DOJAT M, HARF A, TOUCHARD D, LEMAIRE F, BROCHARD L. Clinical evaluation of a computer-controlled pressure support mode. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161(4 Pt 1):1161–1166. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.4.9904064. PubMed DOI PMC

DOJAT M, PACHET F, GUESSOUM Z, TOUCHARD D, HARF A, BROCHARD L. NeoGanesh: a working system for the automated control of assisted ventilation in ICUs. Artif Intell Med. 1997;11:97–117. doi: 10.1016/s0933-3657(97)00025-0. PubMed DOI

GRASSO S, PUNTILLO F, MASCIA L, ANCONA G, FIORE T, BRUNO F, SLUTSKY AS, RANIERI VM. Compensation for increase in respiratory workload during mechanical ventilation. Pressure-support versus proportional-assist ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:819–826. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.3.9902065. PubMed DOI

GRUBER PC, GOMERSALL CD, LEUNG P, JOYNT GM, NG SK, HO KM, UNDERWOOD MJ. Randomized controlled trial comparing adaptive-support ventilation with pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation with automode in weaning patients after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:81–87. doi: 10.1097/aln.0b013e31817881fc. PubMed DOI

CHEN CW, WU CP, DAI YL, PERNG WC, CHIAN CF, SU WL, HUANG YC. Effects of implementing adaptive support ventilation in a medical intensive care unit. Respir Care. 2011;56:976–983. doi: 10.4187/respcare.00966. PubMed DOI

MANUAL_BENNETT_840. Operating Instructions: Bennett 840 ventilator. 2015.

MANUAL_SERVOVENTILATOR_AURA_V. Operating Instructions: Servoventilator AURA V. 2017.

ROUBIK K, PACHL J, ZABRODSKY V. Normocapnic high frequency oscillatory hyperventilation increases oxygenation in pigs. Physiol Res. 2011;60:749–755. PubMed

TONETTI T, VASQUES F, RAPETTI F, MAIOLO G, COLLINO F, ROMITTI F, CAMPOROTA L, CRESSONI M, CADRINGHER P, QUINTEL M, GATTINONI L. Driving pressure and mechanical power: new targets for VILI prevention. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5:286. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.07.08. PubMed DOI PMC

TÖRÖK P, ČANDÍK P, SALADIAK S, RYBÁR D, IMRECZE Š, KOLESÁR A. Basic principles of autoadaptive modes and “automatic proportional minute ventilation of lungs”. SSAIM. 2015:154–158.

TÖRÖK P, DONIČ V, NOSÁĽ M, RYBÁR D, SALADIAK S, SABOL F, KOLESÁR A, JANKAJOVÁ M, GALKOVÁ K. Individualized adjustment of artificial lung ventilation parameters, such as prevention of lung parenchymal trauma. Anaesthesiol Intens Med. 2017;6:72–76.

TÖRÖK P, MÁJEK M, KOLNÍK J. Is the Time Constant „Tau (t)“ in ALV constant? Anaesthesiol Intens Med. 2001;6:291–297.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...