Research Note: The effects of genotype, sex, and feeding regime on performance, carcasses characteristic, and microbiota in chickens
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
33518130
PubMed Central
PMC7858172
DOI
10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.047
PII: S0032-5791(20)30899-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- chicken, genotype, performance, quantitative feed restriction,
- MeSH
- dieta veterinární MeSH
- genotyp * MeSH
- krmivo pro zvířata analýza MeSH
- kur domácí klasifikace genetika růst a vývoj mikrobiologie MeSH
- maso analýza MeSH
- mikrobiota * MeSH
- sexuální faktory MeSH
- tělesná hmotnost MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of quantitative feed restriction (FR) in fast-, medium-, and slow-growing meat-type male and female chickens on their growth, feed consumption, economic efficiency, carcass composition, and gastrointestinal microbiota. In the experiment, fast-growing Ross 308, medium-growing Hubbard JA 757 and slow-growing ISA Dual chickens of both sexes were exposed to quantitative FR between 14 and 21 d of age. During the FR, restricted chickens received 70% of the amount of feed consumed by the ad libitum (AL) group. Live weight at the end of the experiment was affected by genotype (P < 0.001), sex (P < 0.001), feeding regime (P < 0.001), and their interaction (P < 0.001). The highest final weight was in AL and FR ISA Dual males and the lowest was in AL and FR females of the same genotype. A similar tendency was observed in daily weight gain and feed intake. Carcass traits were predominantly affected by genotype. However, interactions of genotype, sex, and feeding regime were observed in thigh (P < 0.001) and abdominal fat (P < 0.001) proportions. Concerning gastrointestinal microbiota, only Escherichia coli was affected by genotype. Feed restriction in slow-growing dual-purpose chickens might improve economic potential; however, further research is needed to reveal the involvement of variable processes, which are unclear and affect production.
Department of Agricultural Food and Environmental Science University of Perugia Italy
International Poultry Testing Station Ústrašice Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Awad W.A., Mann E., Dzieciol M., Hess C., Schmitz-Esser S., Wagner M., Hess M. Age-related differences in the luminal and mucosa-associated gut microbiome of broiler chickens and shifts associated with Campylobacter jejuni infection. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2016;6:154. PubMed PMC
Clavijo V., Vives Flórez M.J. The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: a review. Poul. Sci. 2018;97:1006–1021. PubMed PMC
Dal Bosco A., Mugnai C., Ruggeri S., Mattioli S., Castellini C. Fatty acid composition of meat and estimated indices of lipid metabolism in different poultry genotypes reared under organic system. Poult. Sci. 2012;91:2039–2045. PubMed
Delezie E., Bruggeman V., Swennen Q., Decuypere E., Huyghebaert G. The impact of nutrient density in terms of energy and/or protein on live performance, metabolism and carcass composition of female and male broiler chickens of two commercial broiler strains. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl). 2010;94:509–518. PubMed
Gratta F., Birolo M., Sacchetto R., Radaelli G., Xiccato G., Ballarin C., Bertotto D., Piccirillo A., Petracci M., Maertens L., Trocino A. Effect of feed restriction timing on live performance, breast myopathy occurrence, and muscle fiber degeneration in 2 broiler chicken genetic lines. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:5465–5476. PubMed
Kreuzer M., Müller S., Mazzolini L., Messikommer R.E., Gangnat I.D.M. Are dual-purpose and male layer chickens more resilient against a low-protein-low-soybean diet than slow-growing broilers? Br. Poult. Sci. 2020;61:33–42. PubMed
Mueller S., Taddei L., Albiker D., Kreuzer M., Siegrist M., Messikommer R.E., Gangnat I.D.M. Growth, carcass, and meat quality of 2 dual-purpose chickens and a layer hybrid grown for 67 or 84 D compared with slow-growing broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2020;29:185–196.
Tůmová E., Chodová D. Performance and changes in body composition of broiler chickens depending on feeding regime and sex. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2018;63:518–525.
Van der Klein S.A.S., Silva F.A., Kwakkel R.P., Zuidhof M.J. The effect of quantitative feed restriction on allometric growth in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2017;96:118–126. PubMed
Wise M.G., Siragusa G.R. Quantitative analysis of the intestinal bacterial community in one-to three-week-old commercially reared broiler chickens fed conventional or antibiotic-free vegetable-based diets. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007;102:1138–1149. PubMed