Validation and Update of the Lémann Index to Measure Cumulative Structural Bowel Damage in Crohn's Disease
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, pozorovací studie, práce podpořená grantem, validační studie
Grantová podpora
K23 DK111995
NIDDK NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
34052277
PubMed Central
PMC8609534
DOI
10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.049
PII: S0016-5085(21)03071-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Bowel Damage, Crohn’s Disease, Lémann Index, Validation,
- MeSH
- Crohnova nemoc diagnostické zobrazování patologie chirurgie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- gastrointestinální endoskopie * MeSH
- kolonoskopie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie * MeSH
- metody pro podporu rozhodování * MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- střeva diagnostické zobrazování patologie chirurgie MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- City of New York MeSH
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Lémann Index is a tool measuring cumulative structural bowel damage in Crohn's disease (CD). We reported on its validation and updating. METHODS: This was an international, multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional observational study. At each center, 10 inclusions, stratified by CD duration and location, were planned. For each patient, the digestive tract was divided into 4 organs, upper tract, small bowel, colon/rectum, anus, and subsequently into segments, explored systematically by magnetic resonance imaging and by endoscopies in relation to disease location. For each segment, investigators retrieved information on previous surgical procedures, identified predefined strictures and penetrating lesions of maximal severity (grades 1-3) at each organ investigational method (gastroenterologist and radiologist for magnetic resonance imaging), provided segmental damage evaluation ranging from 0.0 to 10.0 (complete resection). Organ resection-free cumulative damage evaluation was then calculated from the sum of segmental damages. Then investigators provided a 0-10 global damage evaluation from the 4-organ standardized cumulative damage evaluations. Simple linear regressions of investigator damage evaluations on their corresponding Lémann Index were studied, as well as calibration plots. Finally, updated Lémann Index was derived through multiple linear mixed models applied to combined development and validation samples. RESULTS: In 15 centers, 134 patients were included. Correlation coefficients between investigator damage evaluations and Lémann Indexes were >0.80. When analyzing data in 272 patients from both samples and 27 centers, the unbiased correlation estimates were 0.89, 0,97, 0,94, 0.81, and 0.91 for the 4 organs and globally, and stable when applied to one sample or the other. CONCLUSIONS: The updated Lémann Index is a well-established index to assess cumulative bowel damage in CD that can be used in epidemiological studies and disease modification trials.
American Gastroenterology Center Cyprus
Department of Gastroenterology Medical Division Hvidovre University Hospital Hvidovre Denmark
Department of Gastroenterology North Zealand University Hospital Capital Region Denmark
Department of Gastroenterology Slagelse Hospital Slagelse Denmark
Department of Gastroenterology University of Medicine Timișoara România
Department of Radiology Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Radiology Tallaght University Hospital Dublin Ireland
Division of Gastroenterology Surgical Department Hospital Beatriz Ângelo Loures Portugal
Hepato Gastroenterology Department Claude Huriez Hospital University of Lille Lille France
Mater Dei Hospital Department of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology Msida Malta
Radiology Department Claude Huriez hospital University of Lille Lille France
Radiology Department St Mark's Hospital and Imperial College London United Kingdom
Radiology Unit University of Padova Padova Italy
TAGG Research Centre School of Medicine Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Pariente B, Cosnes J, Danese S, et al. Development of the Crohn’s disease digestive damage score, the Lémann score. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17:1415–1422. PubMed PMC
Peyrin-Biroulet L, Loftus EV, Colombel J-F, et al. The natural history of adult Crohn’s disease in population-based cohorts. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:289–297. PubMed
Allen PB, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Moving towards disease modification in inflammatory bowel disease therapy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2013;29:397–404. PubMed
Panaccione R, Colombel J-F, Louis E, et al. Evolving definitions of remission in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013;19:1645–1653. PubMed
Colombel J-F, Mahadevan U. Inflammatory bowel disease 2017: innovations and changing paradigms. Gastroenterology 2017;152:309–312. PubMed
Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB, et al. A review of activity indices and efficacy endpoints for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2002;122:512–530. PubMed
Pariente B, Mary J-Y, Danese S, et al. Development of the Lémann Index to assess digestive tract damage in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2015; 148:52–63. PubMed
Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. Springer, 2009.
Janssen KJM, Moons KGM, Kalkman CJ, et al. Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:76–86. PubMed
Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, 2000.
Xu R Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Stat Med 2003;22:3527–3541. PubMed
Harrell FE Jr. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer: Springer Series in Statistics, 2010.
Le Berre C, Peyrin-Biroulet L; SPIRIT-IOIBD study group. Selecting Endpoints for Disease-Modification Trials in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: the SPIRIT consensus from the IOIBD. Gastroenterology 2021;160:1452–1460.e21. PubMed
Mary JY, Modigliani R; Development and validation of an endoscopic Index of the severity for Crohn’s disease: a prospective multicentre study. Groupe d’Etudes Therapeutiques des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif (GETAID). Gut 1989;30:983–989. PubMed PMC
Daperno M, D’Haens G, Van Assche G, et al. Development and validation of a new, simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn’s disease: the SES-CD. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:505–512. PubMed
Travis SPL, Schnell D, Feagan BG, et al. The impact of clinical information on the assessment of endoscopic activity: characteristics of the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity [UCEIS]. J Crohns Colitis 2015; 9:607–616. PubMed PMC
Travis SPL, Schnell D, Krzeski P, et al. Reliability and initial validation of the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity. Gastroenterology 2013;145:987–995. PubMed
Rimola J, Rodriguez S, García-Bosch O, et al. Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Gut 2009; 58:1113–1120. PubMed
Rimola J, Ordás I, Rodriguez S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohn’s disease: validation of parameters of severity and quantitative Index of activity. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;17:1759–1768. PubMed