• This record comes from PubMed

A phase I, open-label study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of renal impairment

. 2021 Sep ; 88 (3) : 485-497. [epub] 20210607

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Clinical Trial, Phase I, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Links

PubMed 34097100
DOI 10.1007/s00280-021-04308-z
PII: 10.1007/s00280-021-04308-z
Knihovny.cz E-resources

PURPOSE: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is approved for advanced colorectal and gastric/gastroesophageal cancer; however, data in patients with renal impairment (RI) are limited. This phase I study evaluated FTD/TPI in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of RI to develop dosing guidance. METHODS: Patients were enrolled into normal renal function (CrCl ≥ 90 mL/min), mild RI (CrCl 60-89 mL/min), or moderate RI (CrCl 30-59 mL/min) cohorts and administered the recommended FTD/TPI dose (35 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-5 and 8-12; 28-day cycle). Based on interim pharmacokinetics/safety data, patients with severe RI (CrCl 15-29 mL/min) were enrolled and received FTD/TPI 20 mg/m2 twice daily. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (normal renal function [n = 12]; mild RI [n = 12]; moderate RI [n = 11]; severe RI [n = 8]) were enrolled and treated. At steady state, compared to values in patients with normal renal function, FTD area under the curve (AUC) was not significantly different in patients with RI, but TPI AUC was significantly higher and increased with RI severity. FTD/TPI safety profile was consistent with prior experience, but grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the RI cohorts (83.3% [mild], 90.9% [moderate], 75.0% [severe], and normal [50.0%]). Hematologic AEs (anemia and neutropenia) were more frequent with RI. Overall, seven patients discontinued because of unrelated, nonhematologic AEs. CONCLUSION: FTD/TPI is safe and tolerable at the recommended 35 mg/m2 dose in patients with mild/moderate RI and at the reduced 20 mg/m2 dose in patients with severe RI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02301117, registration date: November 21, 2014.

See more in PubMed

Emura T, Murakami Y, Nakagawa F, Fukushima M, Kitazato K (2004) A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells. Int J Mol Med 13(4):545–549 PubMed

Cleary JM, Rosen LS, Yoshida K, Rasco D, Shapiro GI, Sun W (2017) A phase 1 study of the pharmacokinetics of nucleoside analog trifluridine and thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil (components of TAS-102) vs trifluridine alone. Invest New Drugs 35(2):189–197 DOI

Bendell JC, Rosen LS, Mayer RJ et al (2015) Phase 1 study of oral TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 76(5):925–932 DOI

Doi T, Ohtsu A, Yoshino T et al (2012) Phase I study of TAS-102 treatment in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer 107(3):429–434 DOI

Hong DS, Abbruzzese JL, Bogaard K et al (2006) Phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer 107(6):1383–1390 DOI

Overman MJ, Varadhachary G, Kopetz S et al (2008) Phase 1 study of TAS-102 administered once daily on a 5-day-per-week schedule in patients with solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 26(5):445–454 DOI

Scagliotti G, Nishio M, Satouchi M et al (2016) A phase 2 randomized study of TAS-102 versus topotecan or amrubicin in patients requiring second-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer refractory or sensitive to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy. Lung Cancer 100:20–23 DOI

Lee JJ, Seraj J, Yoshida K et al (2016) Human mass balance study of TAS-102 using (14)C analyzed by accelerator mass spectrometry. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77(3):515–526 DOI

Taiho Oncology (2019) LONSURF (trifluridine and tipiracil) tablets, for oral use [prescribing information]. Taiho Oncology Inc, Princeton, NJ

Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A et al (2015) Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(20):1909–1919 DOI

Shitara K, Doi T, Dvorkin M et al (2018) Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19(11):1437–1448 DOI

Launay-Vacher V, Janus N, Deray G (2016) Renal insufficiency and cancer treatments. ESMO Open 1(4):e000091 DOI

Launay-Vacher V, Oudard S, Janus N et al (2007) Prevalence of renal insufficiency in cancer patients and implications for anticancer drug management: the renal insufficiency and anticancer medications (IRMA) study. Cancer 110(6):1376–1384 DOI

National Kidney Foundation (2002) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39(2 Suppl 1):S1-266

US FDA Guidance Document (2010) Pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired renal function: study design, data analysis and impact on dosing and labeling. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/pharmacokinetics-patients-impaired-renal-function-study-design-data-analysis-and-impact-dosing-and . Accessed 27 April 2021

Yoshino T, Mizunuma N, Yamazaki K et al (2012) TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(10):993–1001 DOI

Mayer RJ, Ohtsu A, Yoshino T et al (2016) Efficacy and safety results in patients with impaired renal and hepatic function in the RECOURSE trial. J Clin Oncol 34(15_suppl):3547 DOI

George B, Cutsem EV, Hochster HS et al (2020) Analysis of hematologic adverse events (HeAEs) in trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI)-treated patients (pts) with or without renal/hepatic impairment (RI/HI): Pooled safety analyses from TAGS and RECOURSE. J Clin Oncol 38(4_suppl):145 DOI

Saif MW, Rosen L, Rudek MA et al (2019) Open-label study to evaluate trifluridine/tipiracil safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced solid tumours and hepatic impairment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 85(6):1239–1246 DOI

Ibrahim S, Honig P, Huang SM, Gillespie W, Lesko LJ, Williams RL (2000) Clinical pharmacology studies in patients with renal impairment: past experience and regulatory perspectives. J Clin Pharmacol 40(1):31–38 DOI

Honda H, Hosaka N, Ganz T, Shibata T (2019) Iron metabolism in chronic kidney disease patients. Contrib Nephrol 198:103–111 DOI

Cleary JM, Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E et al (2015) Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of TAS-102 in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): results from 3 phase 1 trials and the phase 3 RECOURSE trial. J Clin Oncol 33(15_suppl):2579 DOI

See more in PubMed

ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02301117

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...