The Abbreviated Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Abbreviated Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS): Psychometric Properties and Evaluation of the Czech Versions
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
19-19526S
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
IGA-CMTF-2021-005
the Sts. Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology of Palacký University Olomouc, Czech republic
PubMed
34639633
PubMed Central
PMC8508516
DOI
10.3390/ijerph181910337
PII: ijerph181910337
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- COVID-19, Czech versions, OASIS, ODSIS, anxiety, depression, psychometric properties,
- MeSH
- deprese * diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- faktorová analýza statistická MeSH
- jazyk (prostředek komunikace) * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- psychometrie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- úzkost diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
Short and effective tools for measuring depression, anxiety and their resulting impairments are lacking in the Czech language. The abbreviated versions of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) show very good psychometric properties in English and other languages, and can be used in different settings for research or clinical purposes. The aim of this study was the psychometric evaluation and validation of the Czech versions of the abbreviated forms of both tools in the general population. A nationally representative sample of 2912 participants (age = 48.88, SD = 15.56; 55% female) was used. The non-parametric testing of the differences between sociodemographic groups revealed a higher level of anxiety and depression in students, females and religious respondents. Confirmatory Factor Analysis suggested a good fit for the unidimensional model of the OASIS: x2(4) = 38.28; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.997; RMSEA = 0.078; SRMR = 0.027 and the ODSIS: x2(4) = 36.54; p < 0.001; TLI = 0.999; CFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.076; SRMR = 0.021 with the data. Both scales had an excellent internal consistency (OASIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95 and ODSIS: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95, McDonald's omega = 0.95). A clinical cut-off of 15 was identified for the OASIS and a cut-off of 12 for the ODSIS. The study showed good validity for both scales. The Czech versions of the abbreviated OASIS and ODSIS were short and valid instruments for measuring anxiety and depression.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Weems C.F., Russell J.D., Neill E.L., Berman S.L., Scott B.G. Existential anxiety among adolescents exposed to disaster: Linkages among level of exposure, PTSD, and depression symptoms. J. Trauma Stress. 2016;29:466–473. doi: 10.1002/jts.22128. PubMed DOI
Furr J.M., Corner J.S., Edmunds J.M., Kendall P.C. Disasters and youth: A meta-analytic examination of posttraumatic stress. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2010;78:765–780. doi: 10.1037/a0021482. PubMed DOI
Wang C.Y., Pan R.Y., Wan X.Y., Tan Y.L., Xu L.K., McIntyre R.S., Choo F.N., Tran B., Ho R., Sharma V.K., et al. A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020;87:40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.028. PubMed DOI PMC
WHO . Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017.
Xiong J.Q., Lipsitz O., Nasri F., Lui L.M.W., Gill H., Phan L., Chen-Li D., Iacobucci M., Ho R., Majeed A., et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2020;277:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001. PubMed DOI PMC
Antony M.M., Orsillo S.M., Roemer L. Practitioner’s Guide to Empirically Based Measures of Anxiety. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; New York, NY, USA: 2001. DOI
Beck A.T., Brown G., Epstein N., Steer R.A. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety—psychometric properties. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1988;56:893–897. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893. PubMed DOI
Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect—the PANAS scales. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1988;54:1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063. PubMed DOI
Bandelow B. Assessing the efficacy of treatments for panic disorder and agoraphobia. The panic and agoraphobia scale. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 1995;10:73–81. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199506000-00003. PubMed DOI
Beck A.T., Steer R.A., Brown G.K. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychological Corporation; San Antonio, TX, USA: 1996.
Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., Williams J.B.W. The PHQ-9—Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001;16:606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Norman S.B., Cissell S.H., Means-Christensen A.J., Stein M.B. Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) Depress. Anxiety. 2006;23:245–249. doi: 10.1002/da.20182. PubMed DOI
Norman S.B., Campbell-Sills L., Hitchcock C.A., Sullivan S., Rochlin A., Wilkins K.C., Stein M.B. Psychometrics of a brief measure of anxiety to detect severity and impairment: The overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS) J. Psychiatr. Res. 2011;45:262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.06.011. PubMed DOI PMC
Gonzalez-Robles A., Mira A., Miguel C., Molinari G., Diaz-Garcia A., Garcia-Palacios A., Breton-Lopez J.M., Quero S., Banos R.M., Botella C. A brief online transdiagnostic measure: Psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) among Spanish patients with emotional disorders. PLoS ONE. 2018;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206516. PubMed DOI PMC
Osma J., Quilez-Orden A., Suso-Ribera C., Peris-Baquero O., Norman S.B., Bentley K.H., Sauer-Zavala S. Psychometric properties and validation of the Spanish versions of the overall anxiety and depression severity and impairment scales. J. Affect. Disord. 2019;252:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.063. PubMed DOI
Hermans M., Korrelboom K., Visser S. A Dutch version of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS): Psychometric properties and validation. J. Affect. Disord. 2015;172:127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.033. PubMed DOI
Ito M., Oe Y., Kato N., Nakajima S., Fujisato H., Miyamae M., Kanie A., Horikoshi M., Norman S.B. Validity and clinical interpretability of Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS) J. Affect. Disord. 2015;170:217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.045. PubMed DOI
Farrahi H., Gharraee B., Oghabian M.A., Pirmoradi M.R., Najibi S.M., Batouli S.A.H. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) Iran. J. Psychiatry Behav. Sci. 2020;14 doi: 10.5812/ijpbs.100674. DOI
Bentley K.H., Gallagher M.W., Carl J.R., Barlow D.H. Development and Validation of the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale. Psychol. Assess. 2014;26:815–830. doi: 10.1037/a0036216. PubMed DOI
Ito M., Bentley K.H., Oe Y., Nakajima S., Fujisato H., Kato N., Miyamae M., Kanie A., Horikoshi M., Barlow D.H. Assessing Depression Related Severity and Functional Impairment: The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) PLoS ONE. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122969. PubMed DOI PMC
Mira A., Gonzalez-Robles A., Molinari G., Miguel C., Diaz-Garcia A., Breton-Lopez J., Garcia-Palacios A., Quero S., Banos R., Botella C. Capturing the Severity and Impairment Associated With Depression: The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) Validation in a Spanish Clinical Sample. Front. Psychiatry. 2019;10:180. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00180. PubMed DOI PMC
Campbell-Sills L., Norman S.B., Craske M.G., Sullivan G., Lang A.J., Chavira D.A., Bystritsky A., Sherbourne C., Roy-Byrne P., Stein M.B. Validation of a brief measure of anxiety-related severity and impairment: The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) J. Affect. Disord. 2009;112:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.014. PubMed DOI PMC
Moore S.A., Welch S.S., Michonski J., Poquiz J., Osborne T.L., Sayrs J., Spanos A. Psychometric evaluation of the Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS) in individuals seeking outpatient specialty treatment for anxiety-related disorders. J. Affect. Disord. 2015;175:463–470. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.041. PubMed DOI
Bragdon L.B., Diefenbach G.J., Hannan S., Tolin D.F. Psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) among psychiatric outpatients. J. Affect. Disord. 2016;201:112–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.005. PubMed DOI
McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Validation of the 5-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1987;52:81–90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81. PubMed DOI
Svoboda M. Psychologická Diagnostika Dospělých. Portal; Praha, Czech Republic: 1999.
Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press; Princeton, NJ, USA: 1965.
Spitzer R.L., Kroenke K., Williams J.B.W., Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder—The GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006;166:1092–1097. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. PubMed DOI
Vargha A., Delaney H.D. A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 2000;25:101–132. doi: 10.3102/10769986025002101. DOI
Novák L., Malinakova K., Tavel P., Sandora J. Czech Version of the short Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS): Psychometric Properties and Evaluation. [(accessed on 30 May 2021)]. Available online: osf.io/r483d. PubMed PMC
Mayers L.S., Gamst G., Guarino A.J. Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications, Inc.; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2013.
Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M.R. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods. 2008;6:53–59. doi: 10.21427/D7CF7R. DOI
Civelek M.E. Essentials of Structural Equation Modeling. Zea Books; Lincoln, NE, USA: 2018.
Hoe S.L. Issues and Procedures in Adopting Structural Equation Modelling Technique. J. Appl. Quant. Methods. 2008;3:76–83.
Vandenberg R.J., Lance C.E. A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organ. Res. Methods. 2000;3:4–70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002. DOI
Jackson D.L., Gillaspy J.A., Purc-Stephenson R. Reporting Practices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Overview and Some Recommendations. Psychol. Methods. 2009;14:6–23. doi: 10.1037/a0014694. PubMed DOI
Schermelleh-Engel K., Moosbrugger H., Müller H. Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods Psychol. Res. Online. 2003;8:23–74.
Eisinga R., te Grotenhuis M., Pelzer B. The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int. J. Public Health. 2013;58:637–642. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3. PubMed DOI
Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 2012;48:1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02. DOI
R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2020.
Van Buuren S., Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. J. Stat. Softw. 2011;45:1–67. doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03. DOI
Aust F., Barth M. Papaja: Create APA Manuscripts with R Markdown. R Package Version; Vienna, Austria: 2020.
Revelle W. Psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University; Evanston, IL, USA: 2020.
Peters G.-J.Y. ufs: Quantitative Analysis Made Accessible. R Package Version; Vienna, Austria: 2018.
Rathbone A., Shaw S., Kumbhare D. ICC.Sample.Size: Calculation of Sample Size and Power for ICC. R Package Version; Vienna, Austria: 2015.
Ahmed M., Hamid R., Hussain G., Bux M., Ahmed N., Kumar M. Anxiety and depression in medical students of Sindh province during the Covid-19 pandemic. Rawal Med. J. 2020;45:947–950.
Fawaz M., Samaha A. E-learning: Depression, anxiety, and stress symptomatology among Lebanese university students during COVID-19 quarantine. Nurs. Forum. 2021;56:52–57. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12521. PubMed DOI
Faisal R.A., Jobe M.C., Ahmed O., Sharker T. Mental Health Status, Anxiety, and Depression Levels of Bangladeshi University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00458-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Odriozola-Gonzalez P., Planchuelo-Gomez A., Irurtia M.J., de Luis-Garcia R. Psychological effects of the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown among students and workers of a Spanish university. Psychiatry Res. 2020;290 doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113108. PubMed DOI PMC
Elmer T., Mepham K., Stadtfeld C. Students under lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and mental health before and during the COVID-19 crisis in Switzerland. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0236337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236337. PubMed DOI PMC
Dlugosz P. Factors influencing mental health among American youth in the time of the Covid-19 pandemic. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2021;175:110711. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110711. PubMed DOI PMC
Shreve-Neiger A.K., Edelstein B.A. Religion and anxiety: A critical review of the literature. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2004;24:379–397. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.02.003. PubMed DOI
AbdAleati N.S., Zaharim N.M., Mydin Y.O. Religiousness and Mental Health: Systematic Review Study. J. Relig. Health. 2016;55:1929–1937. doi: 10.1007/s10943-014-9896-1. PubMed DOI
Ellis L., Wahab E.A. Religiosity and Fear of Death: A Theory-Oriented Review of the Empirical Literature. Rev. Relig. Res. 2013;55:149–189. doi: 10.1007/s13644-012-0064-3. DOI
Jong J., Ross R., Philip T., Chang S.H., Simons N., Halberstadt J. The religious correlates of death anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Relig. Brain Behav. 2018;8:4–20. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2016.1238844. DOI
Malinakova K., Tavel P., Meier Z., van Dijk J.P., Reijneveld S.A. Religiosity and Mental Health: A Contribution to Understanding the Heterogeneity of Research Findings. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:494. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020494. PubMed DOI PMC
Psychometric analysis of the three item loneliness scale in the Czech Republic