AIMS: Electromechanical coupling in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is not fully understood. Our aim was to determine the best combination of electrical and mechanical substrates associated with effective CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were prospectively enrolled from two centres. Patients underwent 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), echocardiography, and anatomo-electromechanical mapping (AEMM). Remodelling was measured as the end-systolic volume (ΔESV) decrease at 6 months. CRT was defined effective with ΔESV ≤ -15%. QRS duration (QRSd) was measured from ECG. Area strain was obtained from AEMM and used to derive systolic stretch index (SSI) and total left-ventricular mechanical time. Total left-ventricular activation time (TLVAT) and transeptal time (TST) were derived from AEMM and ECG. Scar was measured from CMR. Significant correlations were observed between ΔESV and TST [rho = 0.42; responder: 50 (20-58) vs. non-responder: 33 (8-44) ms], TLVAT [-0.68; 81 (73-97) vs. 112 (96-127) ms], scar [-0.27; 0.0 (0.0-1.2) vs. 8.7 (0.0-19.1)%], and SSI [0.41; 10.7 (7.1-16.8) vs. 4.2 (2.9-5.5)], but not QRSd [-0.13; 155 (140-176) vs. 167 (155-177) ms]. TLVAT and SSI were highly accurate in identifying CRT response [area under the curve (AUC) > 0.80], followed by scar (AUC > 0.70). Total left-ventricular activation time (odds ratio = 0.91), scar (0.94), and SSI (1.29) were independent factors associated with effective CRT. Subjects with SSI >7.9% and TLVAT <91 ms all responded to CRT with a median ΔESV ≈ -50%, while low SSI and prolonged TLVAT were more common in non-responders (ΔESV ≈ -5%). CONCLUSION: Electromechanical measurements are better associated with CRT response than conventional ECG variables. The absence of scar combined with high SSI and low TLVAT ensures effectiveness of CRT.

Cardiology Service Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli Bellinzona Switzerland

Center for Computational Medicine in Cardiology Università della Svizzera Italiana Lugano Switzerland

Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure Medical University of Silesia Katowice Poland

Department of Physiology CARIM Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

Division of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases Medical University of Silesia Katowice Poland

Division of Cardiology Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino Lugano Switzerland

Euler institute Università della Svizzera Italiana Lugano Switzerland

IHU LIRYC Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute Fondation Bordeaux Université University of Bordeaux and INSERM U 1045 Cardiothoracic Research Center of Bordeaux Pessac France

Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Group International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic

Maria Cecilia Hospital GVM Care and Research Cotignola Italy

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Prinzen FW, Vernooy K, Auricchio A. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: state-of-the-art of current applications, guidelines, ongoing trials, and areas of controversy. Circulation 2013;128:2407–18. PubMed

McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm Met al. . 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3599–726. PubMed

Wouters PC, Leenders GE, Cramer MJ, Meine M, Prinzen FW, Doevendans PAet al. . Acute recoordination rather than functional hemodynamic improvement determines reverse remodelling by cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;37:1903–11. PubMed PMC

Maffessanti F, Prinzen FW, Conte G, Regoli F, Caputo ML, Suerder Det al. . Integrated assessment of left ventricular electrical activation and myocardial strain mapping in heart failure patients: a holistic diagnostic approach for endocardial cardiac resynchronization therapy, ablation of ventricular tachycardia, and biological therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018;4:138–46. PubMed

Pavo N, Jakab A, Emmert MY, Strebinger G, Wolint P, Zimmermann Met al. . Comparison of NOGA endocardial mapping and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for determining infarct size and infarct transmurality for intramyocardial injection therapy using experimental data. PLoS One 2014;9:e113245. PubMed PMC

Kroon W, Lumens J, Potse M, Suerder D, Klersy C, Regoli Fet al. . In vivo electromechanical assessment of heart failure patients with prolonged QRS duration. Heart Rhythm 2015;12:1259–67. PubMed

Strauss DG, Selvester RH, Wagner GS. Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:927–34. PubMed

Lumens J, Tayal B, Walmsley J, Delgado-Montero A, Huntjens PR, Schwartzman Det al. . Differentiating electromechanical from non-electrical substrates of mechanical discoordination to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:e003744. PubMed

Gorcsan J III, Anderson CP, Tayal B, Sugahara M, Walmsley J, Starling RCet al. . Systolic stretch characterizes the electromechanical substrate responsive to cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:1741–52. PubMed

Flett AS, Hasleton J, Cook C, Hausenloy D, Quarta G, Ariti Cet al. . Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:150–6. PubMed

Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Klein H, Brown MW, Daubert JPet al. . Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1329–38. PubMed

Sweeney MO, van Bommel RJ, Schalij MJ, Borleffs CJ, Hellkamp AS, Bax JJ. Analysis of ventricular activation using surface electrocardiography to predict left ventricular reverse volumetric remodeling during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation 2010;121:626–34. PubMed

Upadhyay GA, Cherian T, Shatz DY, Beaser AD, Aziz Z, Ozcan Cet al. . Intracardiac delineation of septal conduction in left bundle-branch block patterns. Circulation 2019;139:1876–88. PubMed

Lumens J, Leenders GE, Cramer MJ, De Boeck BW, Doevendans PA, Prinzen FWet al. . Mechanistic evaluation of echocardiographic dyssynchrony indices: patient data combined with multiscale computer simulations. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:491–9. PubMed

Díez J, González A, Kovacic JC. Myocardial interstitial fibrosis in nonischemic heart disease, part 3/4: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:2204–18. PubMed PMC

Maffessanti F, Jadczyk T, Kurzelowski R, Regoli F, Caputo ML, Conte Get al. . The influence of scar on the spatio-temporal relationship between electrical and mechanical activation in heart failure patients. Europace 2020;22:777–86. PubMed

Jadczyk T, Kurzelowski R, Golba KS, Wilczek J, Caluori G, Maffessanti Fet al. . Local electromechanical alterations determine the left ventricle rotational dynamics in CRT-eligible heart failure patients. Sci Rep 2021;11:3267. PubMed PMC

Wouters PC, van Everdingen WM, Vernooy K, Geelhoed B, Allaart CP, Rienstra Met al. . Does mechanical dyssynchrony in addition to QRS area ensure sustained response tocardiac resynchronization therapy? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021. https://academic.oup.com/ehjcimaging/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ehjci/jeab264/6454061?login=true. Online ahead of print. PubMed DOI PMC

Jurak P, Curila K, Leinveber P, Prinzen FW, Viscor I, Plesinger Fet al. . Novel ultra-high-frequency electrocardiogram tool for the description of the ventricular depolarization pattern before and during cardiac resynchronization. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020;31:300–7. PubMed

Guo Z, Liu X, Cheng X, Liu C, Li P, He Yet al. . Combination of left ventricular End-diastolic diameter and QRS duration strongly predicts good response to and prognosis of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Cardiol Res Pract 2020;2020:1257578. PubMed PMC

Chung ES, Gold MR, Abraham WT, Young JB, Linde C, Anderson Cet al. . The importance of early evaluation after cardiac resynchronization therapy to redefine response: pooled individual patient analysis from 5 prospective studies. Heart Rhythm 2022;19:595–603. PubMed

Targeted left ventricular lead positioning to the site of latest activation in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis