INTRODUCTION: The present study introduces a new ultra-high-frequency 14-lead electrocardiogram technique (UHF-ECG) for mapping ventricular depolarization patterns and calculation of novel dyssynchrony parameters that may improve the selection of patients and application of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: Components of the ECG in sixteen frequency bands within the 150 to 1000 Hz range were used to create ventricular depolarization maps. The maximum time difference between the UHF QRS complex centers of mass of leads V1 to V8 was defined as ventricular electrical dyssynchrony (e-DYS), and the duration at 50% of peak voltage amplitude in each lead was defined as the duration of local depolarization (Vd). Proof of principle measurements was performed in seven patients with left (left bundle branch block) and four patients with right bundle branch block (right bundle branch block) before and during CRT using biventricular and His-bundle pacing. RESULTS: The acquired activation maps reflect the activation sequence under the tested conditions. e-DYS decreased considerably more than QRS duration, during both biventricular pacing (-50% vs -8%) and His-bundle pacing (-77% vs -13%). While biventricular pacing slightly increased Vd, His-bundle pacing reduced Vd significantly (+11% vs -36%), indicating the contribution of the fast conduction system. Optimization of biventricular pacing by adjusting VV-interval showed a decrease of e-DYS from 102 to 36 ms with only a small Vd increase and QRS duration decrease. CONCLUSIONS: The UHF-ECG technique provides novel information about electrical activation of the ventricles from a standard ECG electrode setup, potentially improving the selection of patients for CRT and application of CRT.

1st Department of Internal Medicine Cardioangiology Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic

Department of Biomedical Engineering The Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication Brno University of Technology Brno Czech Republic

Department of Cardiology Cardiocenter 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic

Department of Physiology Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

Institute of Scientific Instruments The Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czech Republic

International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Asirvatham SJ. Cardiac resynchronization: is electrical synchrony relevant? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(10):1028-1031 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00932.x

Van Deursen CJM, Blaauw Y, Witjens MI, et al. The value of the 12-lead ECG for evaluation and optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in daily clinical practice. J Electrocardiol. 2014;47(2):202-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.01.007

Langner PH, Geselowitz DB, Mansure FT, Lauer JA. High-frequency components in the electrocardiograms of normal subjects and of patients with coronary heart disease. Am Heart J. 1961;62:746-755.

Goldberger AL, Bhargava V, Froelicher V, et al. Effect of myocardial infarction on high-frequency QRS potentials. Circulation. 1981;64(1):34-42.

Nichols TL, Mirvis DM. Frequency content of the electrocardiogram. Spatial features and effects of myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 1985;18(2):185-194.

Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al. MADIT-CRT trial investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1329-1338. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0906431

Plesinger F, Jurak P, Halamek J, et al. Ventricular electrical delay measured from body surface ECGs is associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy response in left bundle branch block patients from the MADIT-CRT trial (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation-cardiac resynchronization therapy response in left bundle branch block patients from the MADIT-CRT trial (multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation-cardiac resynchronization therapy). Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2018;11(5):e005719. https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.117.005719

Halamek J, Leinveber P, Viscor I, et al. The relationship between ECG predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217097

Jurak P, Halamek J, Meluzin J, et al. Ventricular dyssynchrony assessment using ultra-high frequency ECG technique. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;49(3):245-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-017-0268-0

Andrla P, Plesinger F, Halamek J, Leinveber P, Viscor I, Jurak P. A method for removing pacing artifacts from ultra-high-frequency electrocardiograms. 2018 Comput Cardiol Conf. 2018;45:1-5. https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2018.106

Plesinger F, Jurco J, Jurak P. Robust multichannel QRS detection. Comput Cardiol. 2014;2014:557-560.

Arnold AD, Shun-Shin MJ, Keene D, et al. His resynchronization versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(24):3112-3122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.073

Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Herweg B, et al. Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(3):413-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.014

Upadhyay GA, Vijayaraman P, Nayak HM, et al. On-treatment comparison between corrective His bundle pacing and biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: a secondary analysis of His-SYNC. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:1797-1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.009

Vijayaraman P, Huang W. Atrioventricular block at the distal His bundle: electrophysiological insights from left bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm Case Reports. 2019;5:233-236J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrcr.2019.01.006

Auricchio A, Lumens J, Prinzen FW. Cardiac resynchronization therapy has a role in patients with right bundle branch block. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2014;7(3):532-541. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000628

Ploux S, Lumens J, Whinnett Z, et al. Noninvasive electrocardiographic mapping to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(24):2435-43.

Jia P, Ramanathan C, Ghanem RN, Ryu K, Varma N, Rudy Y. Electrocardiographic imaging of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: observation of variable electrophysiologic responses. Heart Rhythm. 2006;3(3):296-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.11.025

Huntjens P, Ploux S, Strik M, et al. Electrical substrates driving response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a combined clinical-computational evaluation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(4):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006613

Assessment of ventricular electrical heterogeneity in left bundle branch pacing and left ventricular septal pacing by using various electrophysiological methods

Ventricular dyssynchrony imaging, echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing

Ultra-high-frequency ECG volumetric and negative derivative epicardial ventricular electrical activation pattern

Ultra-High-Frequency ECG in Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: From Technical Concept to Clinical Application

Resynchronization for shifting conduction patterns - When a coronary sinus lead is not enough

Left ventricular resynchronization with left bundle branch area pacing: does the type of capture matter?

Left bundle branch area pacing results in more physiological ventricular activation than biventricular pacing in patients with left bundle branch block heart failure

Pacing of the specialized His-Purkinje conduction system: 'back to the future'

Bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture preserves physiological ventricular activation better than unipolar left bundle branch pacing

Electromechanical factors associated with favourable outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Golden Standard or Obsolete Method? Review of ECG Applications in Clinical and Experimental Context

Ventricular Dyssynchrony and Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients with Pacemakers, the Utility of Ultra-high-frequency ECG and Other Dyssynchrony Assessment Tools

Left Ventricular Myocardial Septal Pacing in Close Proximity to LBB Does Not Prolong the Duration of the Left Ventricular Lateral Wall Depolarization Compared to LBB Pacing

Clinical Utility of Body Surface Potential Mapping in CRT Patients

3-Dimensional ventricular electrical activation pattern assessed from a novel high-frequency electrocardiographic imaging technique: principles and clinical importance

Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients