In addition to being vectors of pathogenic bacteria, ticks also harbor intracellular bacteria that associate with ticks over generations, aka symbionts. The biological significance of such bacterial symbiosis has been described in several tick species but its function in Ixodes ricinus is not understood. We have previously shown that I. ricinus ticks are primarily inhabited by a single species of symbiont, Midichloria mitochondrii, an intracellular bacterium that resides and reproduces mainly in the mitochondria of ovaries of fully engorged I. ricinus females. To study the functional integration of M. mitochondrii into the biology of I. ricinus, an M. mitochondrii-depleted model of I. ricinus ticks was sought. Various techniques have been described in the literature to achieve dysbiosed or apo-symbiotic ticks with various degrees of success. To address the lack of a standardized experimental procedure for the production of apo-symbiotic ticks, we present here an approach utilizing the ex vivo membrane blood feeding system. In order to deplete M. mitochondrii from ovaries, we supplemented dietary blood with tetracycline. We noted, however, that the use of tetracycline caused immediate toxicity in ticks, caused by impairment of mitochondrial proteosynthesis. To overcome the tetracycline-mediated off-target effect, we established a protocol that leads to the production of an apo-symbiotic strain of I. ricinus, which can be sustained in subsequent generations. In two generations following tetracycline administration and tetracycline-mediated symbiont reduction, M. mitochondrii was gradually eliminated from the lineage. Larvae hatched from eggs laid by such M. mitochondrii-free females repeatedly performed poorly during blood-feeding, while the nymphs and adults performed similarly to controls. These data indicate that M. mitochondrii represents an integral component of tick ovarian tissue, and when absent, results in the formation of substandard larvae with reduced capacity to blood-feed.

CEITEC University of Veterinary Sciences Brno Czechia

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Mendel University Brno Czechia

Department of Microbiology Nutrition and Dietetics CINeZ Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Czechia

Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia Ceske Budejovice Czechia

Institute of Parasitology Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences České Budějovice Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bell-Sakyi L., Zweygarth E., Blouin E. F., Gould E. A., Jongejan F. (2007). Tick cell lines: tools for tick and tick-borne disease research. Trends Parasitol. 23, 450–457. doi:  10.1016/j.pt.2007.07.009 PubMed DOI

Ben-Yosef M., Rot A., Mahagna M., Kapri E., Behar A., Gottlieb Y. (2020). Coxiella-like endosymbiont of PubMed DOI PMC

Bonnet S. I., Binetruy F., Hernández-Jarguín A. M., Duron O. (2017). The tick microbiome: Why non-pathogenic microorganisms matter in tick biology and pathogen transmission. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7. doi:  10.3389/fcimb.2017.00236 PubMed DOI PMC

Buysse M., Duron O. (2018). Multi-locus phylogenetics of the midichloria endosymbionts reveals variable specificity of association with ticks. Parasitology 145, 1969–1978. doi:  10.1017/s0031182018000793 PubMed DOI

Buysse M., Floriano A. M., Gottlieb Y., Nardi T., Comandatore F., Olivieri E., et al. (2021). A dual endosymbiosis supports nutritional adaptation to hematophagy in the invasive tick PubMed DOI PMC

Comandatore F., Radaelli G., Montante S., Sacchi L., Clementi E., Epis S., et al. (2021). Modeling the life cycle of the intramitochondrial bacterium "Candidatus PubMed DOI PMC

Coon K. L., Vogel K. J., Brown M. R., Strand M. R. (2014). Mosquitoes rely on their gut microbiota for development. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2727–2739. doi:  10.1111/mec.12771 PubMed DOI PMC

Correa M. A., Matusovsky B., Brackney D. E., Steven B. (2018). Generation of axenic PubMed DOI PMC

Douglas A. E. (2009). The microbial dimension in insect nutritional ecology. Funct. Ecol. 23, 38–47. doi:  10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01442.x DOI

Douglas A. E. (2014). Symbiosis as a general principle in eukaryotic evolution. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 6, a016113–a016113. doi:  10.1101/cshperspect.a016113 PubMed DOI PMC

Douglas A. E. (2020). Housing microbial symbionts: evolutionary origins and diversification of symbiotic organs in animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 375, 20190603. doi:  10.1098/rstb.2019.0603 PubMed DOI PMC

Duron O., Morel O., Noël V., Buysse M., Binetruy F., Lancelot R., et al. (2018). Tick-bacteria mutualism depends on b vitamin synthesis pathways. Curr. Biol. 28, 1896–1902.e1895. doi:  10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.038 PubMed DOI

Epis S., Sassera D., Beninati T., Lo N., Beati L., Piesman J., et al. (2008). PubMed DOI

Esser D., Lange J., Marinos G., Sieber M., Best L., Prasse D., et al. (2019). Functions of the microbiota for the physiology of animal metaorganisms. J. Innate Immun. 11, 393–404. doi:  10.1159/000495115 PubMed DOI PMC

Gilliland C.A., Patel V., Dombrowski A.C., Mackett B.M., Vogel K.J. (2022), Using axenic and gnotobiotic insects to examine the role of different microbes on the development and reproduction of the kissing bug Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Mol Ecol. doi:  10.1111/mec.16800 PubMed DOI PMC

Gonzalez J., Bickerton M., Toledo A. (2021). Applications of artificial membrane feeding for ixodid ticks. Acta Trop. 215, 105818. doi:  10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105818 PubMed DOI

Guizzo M. G., Neupane S., Kucera M., Perner J., Frantová H., Da Silva Vaz I., et al. (2020). Poor unstable midgut microbiome of hard ticks contrasts with abundant and stable monospecific microbiome in ovaries. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10. doi:  10.3389/fcimb.2020.00211 PubMed DOI PMC

Guizzo M. G., Parizi L. F., Nunes R. D., Schama R., Albano R. M., Tirloni L., et al. (2017). A coxiella mutualist symbiont is essential to the development of PubMed DOI PMC

Guizzo M. G., Tirloni L., Gonzalez S. A., Farber M. D., Braz G., Parizi L. F., et al. (2022). Coxiella endosymbiont of PubMed DOI PMC

Hajdusek O., Sojka D., Kopacek P., Buresova V., Franta Z., Sauman I., et al. (2009). Knockdown of proteins involved in iron metabolism limits tick reproduction and development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 1033–1038. doi:  10.1073/pnas.0807961106 PubMed DOI PMC

Hammer T. J., Sanders J. G., Fierer N. (2019). Not all animals need a microbiome. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 366(10), fnz117. doi:  10.1093/femsle/fnz117 PubMed DOI

Krawczyk A. I., Röttjers L., Fonville M., Takumi K., Takken W., Faust K., et al. (2022). Quantitative microbial population study reveals geographical differences in bacterial symbionts of PubMed DOI PMC

Kröber T., Guerin P. M. (2007). PubMed DOI

Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408. doi:  10.1006/meth.2001.1262 PubMed DOI

Lo N., Beninati T., Sassera D., Bouman E. A. P., Santagati S., Gern L., et al. (2006). Widespread distribution and high prevalence of an alpha-proteobacterial symbiont in the tick PubMed DOI

Moullan N., Mouchiroud L., Wang X., Ryu D., Williams E. G., Mottis A., et al. (2015). Tetracyclines disturb mitochondrial function across eukaryotic models: A call for caution in biomedical research. Cell Rep. 10, 1681–1691. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.034 PubMed DOI PMC

Mushegian A. A., Walser J.-C., Sullam K. E., Ebert D., Hoye B. (2018). The microbiota of diapause: How host-microbe associations are formed after dormancy in an aquatic crustacean. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 400–413. doi:  10.1111/1365-2656.12709 PubMed DOI

Narasimhan S., Rajeevan N., Liu L., Zhao Y. O., Heisig J., Pan J., et al. (2014). Gut microbiota of the tick vector PubMed DOI PMC

Ninio C., Plantard O., Serra V., Pollera C., Ferrari N., Cafiso A., et al. (2015). Antibiotic treatment of the hard tick PubMed DOI

Oliver J. D., Price L. D., Burkhardt N. Y., Heu C. C., Khoo B. S., Thorpe C. J., et al. (2021). Growth dynamics and antibiotic elimination of symbiotic PubMed DOI PMC

Olivieri E., Epis S., Castelli M., Varotto Boccazzi I., Romeo C., Desirò A., et al. (2019). Tissue tropism and metabolic pathways of PubMed DOI

Perner J., Kotál J., Hatalová T., Urbanová V., Bartošová-Sojková P., Brophy P. M., et al. (2018). Inducible glutathione s-transferase (IrGST1) from the tick PubMed DOI

Richter U., Ng K. Y., Suomi F., Marttinen P., Turunen T., Jackson C., et al. (2019). Mitochondrial stress response triggered by defects in protein synthesis quality control. Life Sci. Alliance 2, e201800219. doi:  10.26508/lsa.201800219 PubMed DOI PMC

Romoli O., Schönbeck J. C., Hapfelmeier S., Gendrin M. (2021). Production of germ-free mosquitoes PubMed DOI PMC

Ross B. D., Hayes B., Radey M. C., Lee X., Josek T., Bjork J., et al. (2018). PubMed DOI PMC

Sacchi L., Bigliardi E., Corona S., Beninati T., Lo N., Franceschi A. (2004). A symbiont of the tick PubMed DOI

Sassera D., Beninati T., Bandi C., Bouman E. A. P., Sacchi L., Fabbi M., et al. (2006). ‘Candidatus PubMed DOI

Sassera D., Lo N., Bouman E. A. P., Epis S., Mortarino M., Bandi C. (2008). “Candidatus PubMed DOI PMC

Song X., Zhong Z., Gao L., Weiss B. L., Wang J. (2022). Metabolic interactions between disease-transmitting vectors and their microbiota. Trends Parasitol. 38, 697–708. doi:  10.1016/j.pt.2022.05.002 PubMed DOI

Steven B., Hyde J., Lareau J. C., Brackney D. E. (2021). The axenic and gnotobiotic mosquito: Emerging models for microbiome host interactions. Front. Microbiol. 12. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2021.714222 PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang C.-M., Li N.-X., Zhang T.-T., Qiu Z.-X., Li Y., Li L.-W., et al. (2017). Endosymbiont CLS-HI plays a role in reproduction and development of PubMed DOI

Zhong J., Jasinskas A., Barbour A. G. (2007). Antibiotic treatment of the tick vector PubMed DOI PMC

Zhong Z., Zhong T., Peng Y., Zhou X., Wang Z., Tang H., et al. (2021). Symbiont-regulated serotonin biosynthesis modulates tick feeding activity. Cell Host Microbe 29, 1545–1557.e1544. doi:  10.1016/j.chom.2021.08.011 PubMed DOI

Deep sequencing of 16 Ixodes ricinus ticks unveils insights into their interactions with endosymbionts