Nature-based social interventions to address loneliness among vulnerable populations: a common study protocol for three related randomized controlled trials in Barcelona, Helsinki, and Prague within the RECETAS European project
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu protokol klinické studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
38218784
PubMed Central
PMC10787456
DOI
10.1186/s12889-023-17547-x
PII: 10.1186/s12889-023-17547-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Effectiveness, Group intervention, Health-related quality-of-life, Loneliness, Nature-based social prescribing, Psychosocial group intervention, Psychosocial processes, Randomized controlled trials, Social connectedness,
- MeSH
- kvalita života * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- osamocení * psychologie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sociální práce MeSH
- výzkumný projekt MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- protokol klinické studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: The negative effects of loneliness on population health and wellbeing requires interventions that transcend the medical system and leverage social, cultural, and public health system resources. Group-based social interventions are a potential method to alleviate loneliness. Moreover, nature, as part of our social and health infrastructure, may be an important part of the solutions that are needed to address loneliness. The RECETAS European project H2020 (Re-imagining Environments for Connection and Engagement: Testing Actions for Social Prescribing in Natural Spaces) is an international research project aiming to develop and test the effectiveness of nature-based social interventions to reduce loneliness and increase health-related quality of life. METHODS: This article describes the three related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that will be implemented: the RECETAS-BCN Trial in Barcelona (Spain) is targeting people 18+ from low socio-economic urban areas; the RECETAS-PRG Trial in Prague (Czech Republic) is addressing community-dwelling older adults over 60 years of age, and the RECETAS-HLSNK trial is reaching older people in assisted living facilities. Each trial will recruit 316 adults suffering from loneliness at least sometimes and randomize them to nature-based social interventions called "Friends in Nature" or to the control group. "Friends in Nature" uses modifications of the "Circle of Friends" methodology based on group processes of peer support and empowerment but including activities in nature. Participants will be assessed at baseline, at post-intervention (3 months), and at 6- and 12-month follow-up after baseline. Primary outcomes are the health-related quality-of-life according to 15D measure and The De Jong Gierveld 11-item loneliness scale. Secondary outcomes are health and psychosocial variables tailored to the specific target population. Nature exposure will be collected throughout the intervention period. Process evaluation will explore context, implementation, and mechanism of impact. Additionally, health economic evaluations will be performed. DISCUSSION: The three RECETAS trials will explore the effectiveness of nature-based social interventions among lonely people from various ages, social, economic, and cultural backgrounds. RECETAS meets the growing need of solid evidence for programs addressing loneliness by harnessing the beneficial impact of nature on enhancing wellbeing and social connections. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Barcelona (Spain) trial: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05488496. Registered 29 July 2022. Prague (Czech Republic) trial: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05522140. Registered August 25, 2022. Helsinki (Finland) trial: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05507684. Registered August 12, 2022.
Barcelona Institute for Global Health Doctor Aiguader 88 08003 Barcelona Spain
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública Madrid Spain
Department of General Practice University of Helsinki PO BOX 20 00014 Helsinki Finland
Helsinki University Hospital Unit of Primary Health Care Helsinki Finland
Innovation in Mental Health and Social Wellbeing Research group Vic Spain
Research group on Methodology Methods Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences Vic Spain
Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Spain
Western Uusimaa Wellbeing Services Health Services Espoo Finland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Victor C, Smith K. Interest group session—loneliness and social isolation: the language(s) of loneliness. Innov Aging. 2019;3(Supplement_1):S373.
Cacioppo S, Grippo AJ, London S, Goossens L, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness: clinical import and interventions. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(2):238–49. PubMed PMC
Jansson AH, Karisto A, Pitkälä KH. Listening to the voice of older people: dimensions of loneliness in long-term care facilities. Ageing Soc. 2022;43(12):2894–2911. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X21001975. DOI
Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40(2). 10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8. PubMed PMC
Luanaigh CÓ, Lawlor BA. Loneliness and the health of older people. Int J Geriatr Psychiat. 2008;23(12):1213–1221. doi: 10.1002/gps.2054. PubMed DOI
Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(2):227–37. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568352. PubMed DOI
Tilvis RS, Jolkkonen KPJ, Strandberg TE. Social networks and dementia. Lancet. 2000;356(9223):77–78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)73414-0. PubMed DOI
Fung YDS, Chi LPW, RSY L, Kee F, Chiu A, Wu W. Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023;144:104524. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104524. PubMed DOI
Masi CM, Chen HY, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(3):219–66. PubMed PMC
Fakoya OA, McCorry NK, Donnelly M. Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:129. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8251-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Jansson A, Pitkälä KH. Circle of friends, an encouraging intervention for alleviating loneliness. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(6):714–5. PubMed PMC
Pitkala KH, Routasalo P, Kautiainen H, Tilvis RS. Effects of psychosocial group rehabilitation on health, use of health care services, and mortality of older persons suffering from loneliness: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(7):792–800. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp011. PubMed DOI
Savikko N, Routasalo P, Tilvis R, Pitkälä K. Psychosocial group rehabilitation for lonely older people: favourable processes and mediating factors of the intervention leading to alleviated loneliness. Int J Older People Nursing. 2010;5(1):16–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2009.00191.x. PubMed DOI
Pitkälä KH, Savikko N, Routasalo P. Group dynamics in older people’s closed groups: findings from finnish psychosocial group rehabilitation for lonely older people. Group Therapy. Nova Science Publishers; 2014. pp. 39–74.
Hale J, Knapp C, Bardwell L, Buchenau M, Marshall J, Sancar F, et al. Connecting food environments and health through the relational nature of aesthetics: Gaining insight through the community gardening experience. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(11):1853–1863. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.044. PubMed DOI PMC
Litt J, Schmiege S, Hale J, Buchenau M, Sancar F. Exploring ecological, emotional and social levers of self-rated health for urban gardeners and non-gardeners: a path analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1982;144:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.004. PubMed DOI PMC
Leavell MA, Leiferman JA, Gascon M, Braddick F, Gonzalez JC, Litt JS. Nature-Based Social Prescribing in Urban Settings to Improve Social Connectedness and Mental Well-being: a Review. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019;6(4):297–308. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-00251-7. PubMed DOI
Marselle MR, Hartig T, Cox DTC, de Bell S, Knapp S, Lindley S, et al. Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: A conceptual framework. Environ Int. 2021;150:106420. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106420. PubMed DOI
Cameron RWF, Brindley P, Mears M, McEwan K, Ferguson F, Sheffield D, et al. Where the wild things are! Do urban green spaces with greater avian biodiversity promote more positive emotions in humans? Urban Ecosyst. 2020;23(2):301–317. doi: 10.1007/s11252-020-00929-z. DOI
Franco LS, Shanahan DF, Fuller RA. A review of the benefits of nature experiences: more than meets the eye. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(8):864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080864. PubMed DOI PMC
Litt JS, Alaimo K, Harrall KK, Hamman RF, Hébert JR, Hurley TG, et al. Effects of a community gardening intervention on diet, physical activity, and anthropometry outcomes in the USA (CAPS): an observer-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Planet Health. 2023;7(1):e23–e32. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00303-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Sachs A, Tharrey M, Darmon N, Alaimo K, Boshara A, Beavers A, et al. “To me, it’s just natural to be in the garden”: A multi-site investigation of new community gardener motivation using Self-Determination Theory. Wellbeing Space Soc. 2022;3:100088. doi: 10.1016/j.wss.2022.100088. DOI
Astell-Burt T, Hartig T, Eckermann S, Nieuwenhuijsen M, McMunn A, Frumkin H, et al. More green, less lonely? A longitudinal cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2022;51(1):99–110. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab089. PubMed DOI PMC
Astell-Burt T, Hartig T, Putra IGNE, Walsan R, Dendup T, Feng X. Green space and loneliness: A systematic review with theoretical and methodological guidance for future research. Sci Total Environ. 2022;847:157521. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157521. PubMed DOI
Litt JS, Coll-Planas L, Sachs A, Rochau U, Beacom A, Jansson A, Garcia-Velez G, Dostalova V, Bekessy S, Blancafort-Alias S, Hill N, Gascon M, Roque-Figuls M, Bartova A, Daher C, Kolarova I, Cucchiaro A, Colom J, Gentile S, Homerova I, Johnson K, Kimberlee R, Siebert U, Varda D, Pitkala KH. RECETAS: Rationale and logic model of a nature-based social intervention for people experiencing loneliness, Cities & Health. 2023. 10.1080/23748834.2023.2300207.
Litt JS, Coll-Planas L, Sachs AL, Masó Aguado M, Howarth M. Current Trends and Future Directions in Urban Social Prescribing. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2023:1-1. PubMed
Kimberlee R. What is social prescribing? Adv Soc Sci Res J. 2015;2(1) https://journals.scholarpublishing.org/index.php/ASSRJ/article/view/808 .
Kilgarriff-Foster A, O’Cathain A. Exploring the components and impact of social prescribing. J Public Ment Health. 2015;14(3):127–134. doi: 10.1108/JPMH-06-2014-0027. DOI
Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392–429. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197. PubMed DOI PMC
Zantinge EM, Verhaak PFM, Kerssens JJ, Bensing JM. The workload of GPs: consultations of patients with psychological and somatic problems compared. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract. 2005;55(517):609–614. PubMed PMC
Mygind L, Kjeldsted E, Hartmeyer RD, Mygind E, Bølling M, Bentsen P. Immersive Nature-Experiences as Health Promotion Interventions for Healthy, Vulnerable, and Sick Populations? A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Controlled Studies. Front Psychol. 2019;10. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31130890/. Accessed 9 Jan 2023. PubMed PMC
Hari J. Lost connections: uncovering the real causes of depression-and the unexpected solutions. Bloomsbury USA; 2019. p. 416. PubMed PMC
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, Hróbjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Doré CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583. PubMed DOI PMC
Santos-Tapia C, Hidalgo L, Jimenez-Arenas P, Casajuana C, Domènech S, Ballester-Lledó A, Blancafort-Alias S. Co-Creating a Nature-Based Social Prescription Intervention in Urban Socioeconomically Deprived Neighbourhoods: A Case Study from RECETAS Project in Barcelona, Spain. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2023;2023.
Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):328–336. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002086. PubMed DOI
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman DG, Barbour V, Macdonald H, Johnston M, Lamb SE, Dixon-Woods M, McCulloch P, Wyatt JC, Chan AW, Michie S. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. 10.1136/bmj.g1687. PubMed
Jansson AH, Savikko NM, Pitkälä KH. Training professionals to implement a group model for alleviating loneliness among older people – 10-year follow-up study. Educ Gerontol. 2018;44(2-3):119–127. doi: 10.1080/03601277.2017.1420005. DOI
de Jong-Gierveld J, Kamphuls F. The Development of a Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale. Appl Psychol Meas. 1985;9(3):289–99. doi: 10.1177/014662168500900307. DOI
Moore, GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O'Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. bmj. 2015;350. PubMed PMC
Hernán MA, Robins JM. Per-protocol analyses of pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(14):1391–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsm1605385. PubMed DOI
Latimer NR, White IR, Tilling K, Siebert U. Improving two-stage estimation to adjust for treatment switching in randomised trials: g-estimation to address time-dependent confounding. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020;29(10):2900–18. doi: 10.1177/0962280220912524. PubMed DOI PMC
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. PubMed DOI PMC
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. PubMed DOI PMC
Akhter-Khan SC, Prina M, Wong GH, Mayston R, Li L. Understanding and Addressing Older Adults' Loneliness: The Social Relationship Expectations Framework. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023;18(4):762–77. doi: 10.1177/17456916221127218. PubMed DOI PMC
Akhter-Khan SC, Au R. Why Loneliness Interventions Are Unsuccessful: A Call for Precision Health. Adv Geriatr Med Res. 2020;2(3):e200016. 10.20900/agmr20200016. PubMed PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05488496, NCT05507684, NCT05522140