Ixazomib plus daratumumab and dexamethasone: Final analysis of a phase 2 study among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

. 2024 Sep ; 99 (9) : 1746-1756. [epub] 20240610

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, klinické zkoušky, fáze II, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38856176

Grantová podpora
T32 HS000046 AHRQ HHS - United States
Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, MA, USA

Novel therapies have improved outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but most ultimately relapse, making treatment decisions for relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) patients increasingly challenging. We report the final analysis of a single-arm, phase 2 study evaluating the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib combined with daratumumab and dexamethasone (IDd; NCT03439293). Sixty-one RRMM patients (ixazomib/daratumumab-naïve; 1-3 prior therapies) were enrolled to receive IDd (28-day cycles) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Median age was 69 years; 14.8% of patients had International Staging System stage III disease; 14.8% had received three prior therapies. Patients received a median of 16 cycles of IDd. In 59 response-evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 64.4%; the confirmed ≥very good partial response (VGPR) rate (primary endpoint) was 30.5%. Rates of ≥VGPR in patient subgroups were: high-risk cytogenetics (n = 15, 26.7%), expanded high-risk cytogenetics (n = 24, 29.2%), aged ≥75 years (n = 12, 16.7%), lenalidomide-refractory (n = 21, 28.6%), and prior PI/IMiD therapy (n = 58, 31.0%). With a median follow-up of 31.6 months, median progression-free survival was 16.8 months (95% confidence interval: 10.1-23.7). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 54.1% of patients; 44.3% had serious TEAEs; TEAEs led to dose modifications/reductions/discontinuations in 62.3%/36.1%/16.4%. There were five on-study deaths. Any-grade and grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 18.0% and 1.6% of patients. Quality of life was generally maintained throughout treatment. IDd showed a positive risk-benefit profile in RRMM patients and was active in clinically relevant subgroups with no new safety signals.

Clinical Research Takeda Development Center Americas Inc Lexington Massachusetts USA

Colorado Blood Cancer Institute and Sarah Cannon Research Institute Denver Colorado USA

Department of Haematooncology University Hospital Ostrava and Department of Haematooncology Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit General Hospital Evangelismos Athens Greece

Department of Hematology Medical University of Lodz and Copernicus Memorial Hospital Lodz Poland

Department of Hematology University General Hospital of Patras Patras Greece

Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic

Department of Internal Medicine Hematology and Oncology University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Internal Medicine Hematology University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Departments of Lymphoma Myeloma and Experimental Therapeutics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

Florida Cancer Specialists Tallahassee Cancer Center Tallahassee Florida USA

Global Evidence and Outcomes Lexington Massachusetts USA

Hematology and Medical Oncology Department of Clinical Therapeutics National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine Athens Greece

Oncology Clinical Research Takeda Development Center Americas Inc Lexington Massachusetts USA

Oncology Takeda Development Center Americas Inc Lexington Massachusetts USA

Precision and Translational Medicine Takeda Development Center Americas Inc Lexington Massachusetts USA

Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology Takeda Development Center Americas Inc Lexington Massachusetts USA

Sarah Cannon Research Institute Nashville Tennessee USA

Statistics Takeda Development Center Americas Inc Lexington Massachusetts USA

University Hospital Hôtel Dieu Nantes France

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Goldschmidt H, Ashcroft J, Szabo Z, Garderet L. Navigating the treatment landscape in multiple myeloma: which combinations to use and when? Ann Hematol. 2019;98:1‐18. doi:10.1007/s00277‐018‐3546‐8

Tanenbaum B, Miett T, Patel SA. The emerging therapeutic landscape of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2023;102:1‐11. doi:10.1007/s00277‐022‐05058‐5

Moreau P, Kumar SK, San Miguel J, et al. Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:e105‐e118. doi:10.1016/s1470‐2045(20)30756‐7

Terpos E, Suzan F, Goldschmidt H. Going the distance: are we losing patients along the multiple myeloma treatment pathway? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018;126:19‐23. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.03.021

Kumar S, Lee JH, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Outcomes after initial relapse of multiple myeloma: an International Myeloma Working Group study. Blood. 2015;126:4201. doi:10.1182/blood.V126.23.4201.4201

Kumar SK, Therneau TM, Gertz MA, et al. Clinical course of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:867‐874. doi:10.4065/79.7.867

Venner CP, Bahlis NJ, Neri P, et al. In multiple myeloma progression free and overall survival in the relapsed setting remains poor with early exposure to novel agents: experience from a real‐world cohort. Blood. 2015;126:4261. doi:10.1182/blood.V126.23.4261.4261

Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Terpos E, et al. Multiple myeloma: EHA‐ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up(†). Ann Oncol. 2021;32:309‐322. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.014

Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc. NINLARO® (ixazomib) capsules, for oral use. US prescribing information. 2024. Accessed August 2022, https://www.ninlaro.com/prescribing-information.pdf

Takeda Pharma A/S. NINLARO: European product assessment report (EPAR) ‐ product information. Annex 1 ‐ summary of product characteristics. Accessed August 2022, https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/ninlaro-epar-product-information_en.pdf

Moreau P, Masszi T, Grzasko N, et al. Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1621‐1634. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1516282

Richardson PG, Kumar SK, Masszi T, et al. Final overall survival analysis of the TOURMALINE‐MM1 phase III trial of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:2430‐2442.

Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies. DARZALEX® (daratumumab) injection, for intravenous use; US prescribing information. Accessed August 2022, https://www.janssenlabels.com/package-insert/product-monograph/prescribing-information/DARZALEX-pi.pdf

Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies. DARZALEX: European product assessment report (EPAR) ‐ product information. Annex 1 ‐ summary of product characteristics. Accessed August 2022, https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product‐information/darzalex‐epar‐product‐information_en.pdf

Palumbo A, Chanan‐Khan A, Weisel K, et al. Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:754‐766. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1606038

Usmani SZ, Quach H, Mateos MV, et al. Final analysis of carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab vs carfilzomib and dexamethasone in the CANDOR study. Blood Adv. 2023;7:3739‐3748. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010026

Mikhael J, Ismaila N, Cheung MC, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma: ASCO and CCO joint clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1228‐1263. doi:10.1200/jco.18.02096

Bruno AS, Willson JL, Opalinska JM, et al. Recent real‐world treatment patterns and outcomes in US patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol. 2020;13:1017‐1025. doi:10.1080/17474086.2020.1800451

Rajkumar SV, Kumar S. Multiple myeloma current treatment algorithms. Blood Cancer J. 2020;10:94. doi:10.1038/s41408‐020‐00359‐2

van de Donk N. Sequencing multiple myeloma therapies with and after antibody therapies. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2020;2020:248‐258. doi:10.1182/hematology.2020000109

Jimenez‐Zepeda VH, Duggan P, Neri P, Tay J, Bahlis NJ. Bortezomib‐containing regimens (BCR) for the treatment of non‐transplant eligible multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2017;96:431‐439. doi:10.1007/s00277‐016‐2901‐x

Mateos MV, Richardson PG, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Effect of cumulative bortezomib dose on survival in multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib‐melphalan‐prednisone in the phase III VISTA study. Am J Hematol. 2015;90:314‐319. doi:10.1002/ajh.23933

Facon T, Venner CP, Bahlis NJ, et al. Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant‐ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2021;137:3616‐3628. doi:10.1182/blood.2020008787

Moreau P, Pylypenko H, Grosicki S, et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: a randomised, phase 3, non‐inferiority study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:431‐440. doi:10.1016/s1470‐2045(11)70081‐x

Scott K, Hayden PJ, Will A, Wheatley K, Coyne I. Bortezomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:Cd010816. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010816.pub2

Georgiopoulos G, Makris N, Laina A, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity of proteasome inhibitors: underlying mechanisms and management strategies: JACC: CardioOncology state‐of‐the‐art review. JACC CardioOncol. 2023;5:1‐21. doi:10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.12.005

Richardson PG, San Miguel JF, Moreau P, et al. Interpreting clinical trial data in multiple myeloma: translating findings to the real‐world setting. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8:1‐12. doi:10.1038/s41408‐018‐0141‐0

Franz J, Myrus E, Sanchez L, Richter J. No needles needed: all‐oral therapy options for relapsed & refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Rev. 2022;57:100993. doi:10.1016/j.blre.2022.100993

Palumbo A, Rajkumar SV, San Miguel JF, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus statement for the management, treatment, and supportive care of patients with myeloma not eligible for standard autologous stem‐cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:587‐600. doi:10.1200/jco.2013.48.7934

Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006;20:1467‐1473. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404284

Rajkumar SV, Harousseau JL, Durie B, et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop consensus panel 1. Blood. 2011;117:4691‐4695. doi:10.1182/blood‐2010‐10‐299487

Terpos E, Gavriatopoulou M, Katodritou E, et al. Safety and efficacy of daratumumab with ixazomib and dexamethasone in patients with one prior lenalidomide‐based regimen: outcomes of the phase 2 Daria study. Blood. 2021;138(1):2737. doi:10.1182/blood‐2021‐153082

Mateos MV, Sonneveld P, Hungria V, et al. Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma: three‐year follow‐up of CASTOR. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20:509‐518. doi:10.1016/j.clml.2019.09.623

Dimopoulos M, Quach H, Mateos MV, et al. Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open‐label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2020;396:186‐197. doi:10.1016/s0140‐6736(20)30734‐0

Velasco R, Alberti P, Bruna J, Psimaras D, Argyriou AA. Bortezomib and other proteosome inhibitors—induced peripheral neurotoxicity: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2019;24:S52‐S62. doi:10.1111/jns.12338

Kvam AK, Fayers PM, Wisloff F. Responsiveness and minimal important score differences in quality‐of‐life questionnaires: a comparison of the EORTC QLQ‐C30 cancer‐specific questionnaire to the generic utility questionnaires EQ‐5D and 15D in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol. 2011;87:330‐337. doi:10.1111/j.1600‐0609.2011.01665.x

Sully K, Trigg A, Bonner N, et al. Estimation of minimally important differences and responder definitions for EORTC QLQ‐MY20 scores in multiple myeloma patients. Eur J Haematol. 2019;103:500‐509. doi:10.1111/ejh.13316

Gupta N, Diderichsen PM, Hanley MJ, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, including data from the phase III TOURMALINE‐MM1 study to inform labelling. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:1355‐1368. doi:10.1007/s40262‐017‐0526‐4

Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:548‐567. doi:10.1002/ajh.25791

Nooka AK, Joseph NS, Gupta VA, et al. A randomized phase II study of daratumumab, ixazomib, and dexamethasone (DId, arm a) vs daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd) followed by daratumumab, did (arm B) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (DeRIVE) study. Blood. 2023;142:4764. doi:10.1182/blood‐2023‐190871

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...