OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) secukinumab for the treatment of adults with active axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in INVIGORATE-1. METHODS: INVIGORATE-1 (NCT04156620) was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial in patients with active axSpA (either radiographic or nonradiographic). Patients were randomized one to one to receive IV secukinumab (6 mg/kg at baseline followed by 3 mg/kg every four weeks) or IV placebo for 16 weeks. After week 16, patients randomized to placebo were switched to IV secukinumab (3 mg/kg every four weeks), and patients randomized to secukinumab continued treatment through week 52. The primary endpoint was the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS40) response at week 16. Safety was evaluated through week 60. RESULTS: Among patients initially randomized to IV secukinumab (n = 264) or placebo (n = 262), 86.0% and 88.9% completed the entire 60-week study period, respectively. A higher proportion of patients receiving secukinumab versus placebo met the primary endpoint (ASAS40 response) at week 16 (40.9% vs 22.9%; P < 0.0001). By week 24, patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 16 achieved ASAS40 response rates comparable to those in patients originally randomized to secukinumab. All secondary efficacy endpoints were met at week 16, and responses were sustained through week 52. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed with IV secukinumab. CONCLUSION: IV secukinumab was effective for the treatment of adults with active axSpA over 52 weeks. The safety profile was consistent with that in previous reports on subcutaneous secukinumab.

• MeSH
• antirevmatika aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• axiální spondyloartritida * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• intravenózní podání MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

Většina pacientů s mnohočetným myelomem (MM) je starší 50 let, což je věk, kdy jsou kardiovaskulární nemoci běžné. Proto je třeba být si vědom nežádoucích kardiovaskulárních vlivů protimyelomových léků. Z klasických cytostatik má známý kardiotoxický vliv doxorubicin. Kardiovaskulární komplikace však mohou způsobit také vysoké dávky cyklofosfamidu, používané pro sběr kmenových krvetvorných buněk. Proto se při poškození srdce AL-amyloidózou doporučuje sběr kmenových buněk po G-CSF. Dávky melfalanu, které jsou obvyklé při transplantaci krvetvorné tkáně, mohou taktéž působit negativně na srdce a indukovat arytmie. Ze skupiny inhibitorů proteazomu má nejvíce kardiovaskulárních nežádoucích účinků karfilzomib, po bortezomibu byly popsány v podstatně menší míře, u ixazomibu se kardiotoxicita nepopisuje. U léků ze skupiny IMiD dominuje prokoagulační účinek, vyžadují cílenou profylaxi trombóz a plicních embolií, ale popsány byly i poruchy rytmu. Léčba novými anti-CD38 monoklonálními protilátkami není spojena s evidentní kardiotoxicitou, nežádoucí účinek v oblasti kardiovaskulární se však popisuje u glukokortikoidů, které jsou standardní premedikací při podání anti-CD protilátek. Cílem textu je informovat o incidenci těchto komplikací asociovaných s protimyelomovou léčbou.

Most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are over 50 years old, which is an age when cardiovascular diseases are common. Therefore, it is important to be aware of the potential adverse cardiovascular effects of anti-myeloma drugs. Among conventional cytostatics, doxorubicin is known for its cardiotoxic effects. High doses of cyclophosphamide, used for stem cell collection, can also cause cardiovascular complications. Therefore, in cases where the heart is affected by AL amyloidosis, stem cell collection after G-CSF is recommended. The doses of melphalan typically used during haematopoietic stem cell transplantation may also have a negative impact on the heart and induce arrhythmias. Among proteasome inhibitors, carfilzomib is associated with the highest number of cardiovascular side effects, while those reported with bortezomib are significantly less frequent, and ixazomib is not associated with cardiotoxicity. In the group of IMiD drugs, procoagulant effects dominate, requiring targeted prophylaxis for thrombosis and pulmonary embolism; however, rhythm disorders have also been reported. Treatment with new anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies is not linked to evident cardiotoxicity, but adverse cardiovascular effects are associated with glucocorticoids, which are standard premedications for administering anti-CD antibodies. The aim of this text is to inform about the incidence of these complications associated with anti-myeloma treatment.

• MeSH
• cyklofosfamid škodlivé účinky   toxicita   MeSH
• inhibitory proteasomu škodlivé účinky   toxicita   MeSH
• kardiotoxicita * etiologie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• melfalan škodlivé účinky   toxicita   MeSH
• mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie   komplikace   MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky škodlivé účinky   toxicita   MeSH
• nežádoucí účinky léčiv MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• přehledy MeSH

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, has been approved for use with standard myeloma regimens. An evaluation of subcutaneous daratumumab combined with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) for the treatment of transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is needed. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 709 transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma to receive either subcutaneous daratumumab combined with VRd induction and consolidation therapy and with lenalidomide maintenance therapy (D-VRd group) or VRd induction and consolidation therapy and lenalidomide maintenance therapy alone (VRd group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 47.5 months, the risk of disease progression or death in the D-VRd group was lower than the risk in the VRd group. The estimated percentage of patients with progression-free survival at 48 months was 84.3% in the D-VRd group and 67.7% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.59; P<0.001); the P value crossed the prespecified stopping boundary (P = 0.0126). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was higher in the D-VRd group than in the VRd group (87.9% vs. 70.1%, P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status (75.2% vs. 47.5%, P<0.001). Death occurred in 34 patients in the D-VRd group and 44 patients in the VRd group. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in most patients in both groups; the most common were neutropenia (62.1% with D-VRd and 51.0% with VRd) and thrombocytopenia (29.1% and 17.3%, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in 57.0% of the patients in the D-VRd group and 49.3% of those in the VRd group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of subcutaneous daratumumab to VRd induction and consolidation therapy and to lenalidomide maintenance therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (Funded by the European Myeloma Network in collaboration with Janssen Research and Development; PERSEUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03710603; EudraCT number, 2018-002992-16.).

• MeSH
• bortezomib aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• dexamethason aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lenalidomid aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• progrese nemoci MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

• Klíčová slova
• romosozumab,
• MeSH
• kardiovaskulární nemoci epidemiologie   patofyziologie   MeSH
• klinické zkoušky jako téma MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• osteoporóza farmakoterapie   komplikace   patofyziologie   MeSH
• rizikové faktory kardiovaskulárních chorob * MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH

BACKGROUND: Although biologic agents are very effective, long-term comparative studies demonstrating their safety relative to one another are still lacking. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with psoriasis were followed up for 30 months; 74 received anti-TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab), 33 were on ustekinumab, and 17 were treated with secukinumab. The rates of adverse events in these groups were recorded and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Infliximab-treated patients showed a high occurrence of asymptomatic, but increased liver enzymes, fatigue, and respiratory as well as dermatologic infections. Adalimumab-treated patients were more often affected by musculoskeletal disorders and infections of all types. Patients treated with secukinumab presented with higher rates of cardiovascular disorders as well as respiratory and dermatologic infections. The group receiving etanercept was more often diagnosed with musculoskeletal and reproductive disorders, specifically menstrual disorders. The rates of therapy discontinuation and serious adverse events did not reach statistically significant values. CONCLUSION: A higher incidence of adverse events was observed among adalimumab-, and infliximab-treated patients, with ustekinumab found to have the safest profile. Our results demonstrate that a personalized approach, including evaluation of a patient's risk profile, is necessary before commencing a biologic. Further research is warranted to confirm the findings of our study.

• MeSH
• adalimumab * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dermatologické látky škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• etanercept * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• infliximab * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• kohortové studie MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• psoriáza * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• ustekinumab * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• pozorovací studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the standard treatment for cisplatin-eligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Adding perioperative immunotherapy may improve outcomes. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label, randomized trial, we assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, cisplatin-eligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer to receive neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by radical cystectomy and adjuvant durvalumab every 4 weeks for eight cycles (durvalumab group), or to receive neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy alone (comparison group). Event-free survival was one of two primary end points. Overall survival was the key secondary end point. RESULTS: In total, 533 patients were assigned to the durvalumab group and 530 to the comparison group. The estimated event-free survival at 24 months was 67.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.6 to 71.7) in the durvalumab group and 59.8% (95% CI, 55.4 to 64.0) in the comparison group (hazard ratio for progression, recurrence, not undergoing radical cystectomy, or death from any cause, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.82; P<0.001 by stratified log-rank test). The estimated overall survival at 24 months was 82.2% (95% CI, 78.7 to 85.2) in the durvalumab group and 75.2% (95% CI, 71.3 to 78.8) in the comparison group (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.93; P = 0.01 by stratified log-rank test). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 in severity occurred in 40.6% of the patients in the durvalumab group and in 40.9% of those in the comparison group; treatment-related adverse events leading to death occurred in 0.6% in each group. Radical cystectomy was performed in 88.0% of the patients in the durvalumab group and in 83.2% of those in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy led to significant improvements in event-free survival and overall survival as compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. (Funded by AstraZeneca; NIAGARA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03732677; EudraCT number, 2018-001811-59.).

• MeSH
• adjuvantní chemoterapie škodlivé účinky   metody   MeSH
• analýza přežití MeSH
• cisplatina aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• cystektomie * MeSH
• deoxycytidin * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   analogy a deriváty   MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• gemcitabin MeSH
• Kaplanův-Meierův odhad MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře * mortalita   patologie   terapie   MeSH
• neoadjuvantní terapie škodlivé účinky   metody   MeSH
• protinádorové látky imunologicky aktivní * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy with durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, may have efficacy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer who do not have disease progression after standard concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients to receive durvalumab at a dose of 1500 mg, durvalumab (1500 mg) plus tremelimumab at a dose of 75 mg (four doses only), or placebo every 4 weeks for up to 24 months. Randomization was stratified according to disease stage (I or II vs. III) and receipt of prophylactic cranial irradiation (yes vs. no). Results of the first planned interim analysis of the two primary end points of overall survival and progression-free survival (assessed on the basis of blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1) with durvalumab as compared with placebo (data cutoff date, January 15, 2024) are reported; results in the durvalumab-tremelimumab group remain blinded. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients were assigned to the durvalumab group, 200 to the durvalumab-tremelimumab group, and 266 to the placebo group. Durvalumab therapy led to significantly longer overall survival than placebo (median, 55.9 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 37.3 to not reached] vs. 33.4 months [95% CI, 25.5 to 39.9]; hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 98.321% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P = 0.01), as well as to significantly longer progression-free survival (median 16.6 months [95% CI, 10.2 to 28.2] vs. 9.2 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 12.9]; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.76; 97.195% CI, 0.59 to 0.98; P = 0.02). The incidence of adverse events with a maximum grade of 3 or 4 was 24.4% among patients receiving durvalumab and 24.2% among patients receiving placebo; adverse events led to discontinuation in 16.4% and 10.6% of the patients, respectively, and led to death in 2.7% and 1.9%. Pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis with a maximum grade of 3 or 4 occurred in 3.1% of the patients in the durvalumab group and in 2.6% of those in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy with durvalumab led to significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival than placebo among patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ADRIATIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03703297.).

• MeSH
• adjuvantní chemoterapie škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• analýza přežití MeSH
• chemoradioterapie * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby * MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Kaplanův-Meierův odhad MeSH
• kraniální ozáření škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• malobuněčný karcinom plic * farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• nádory plic * farmakoterapie   mortalita   patologie   terapie   MeSH
• protinádorové látky imunologicky aktivní terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• staging nádorů MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

OBJECTIVES: Cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38) is a key target on multiple myeloma (MM) cells. This multi-centre, Phase 1, single-agent study (NCT04000282) investigated SAR442085, a novel fragment crystallisable (Fc)-modified anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), with enhanced affinity towards Fc-gamma receptor on effector cells in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (RR) MM. METHODS: This study comprised two parts: Part-A (dose-escalation involving anti-CD38 mAb pre-treated and naïve patients) and Part-B (dose expansion). Primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). RESULTS: Thirty-seven heavily pre-treated patients were treated in Part A. Part-B (dose-expansion) was not studied. Seven dose-limiting toxicities were reported at DL3, DL5, DL6, and DL7. RP2D was determined to be 5-7·5 mg/kg. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events were infusion-related reactions in 70·3% (26/37) patients. Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia was reported in 48·6% (18/37). Overall response rate was 70% in anti-CD38 mAb naïve and 4% in anti-CD38 pre-treated patients, with a median progression-free survival of 7·62 (95%CI: 2·858; not calculable) months and 2·79 (95%CI: 1·150; 4·172) months and, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of SAR442085 was promising in anti-CD38 mAb naïve patients but did not extend to the larger cohort of anti-CD38 mAb pre-treated patients. This observation, along with transient high-grade thrombocytopenia, could potentially limit its clinical use.

• MeSH
• antigeny CD38 antagonisté a inhibitory   imunologie   MeSH
• chemorezistence MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• maximální tolerovaná dávka MeSH
• mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• recidiva MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze I MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH

• MeSH
• adalimumab terapeutické užití   MeSH
• atopická dermatitida farmakoterapie   MeSH
• biologická terapie * metody   MeSH
• cyklosporin aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• hidradenitis suppurativa farmakoterapie   MeSH
• inhibitory Janus kinas aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• kožní nemoci * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• pruritus farmakoterapie   MeSH
• psoriáza farmakoterapie   patofyziologie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• kazuistiky MeSH
• novinové články MeSH

Novel therapies have improved outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but most ultimately relapse, making treatment decisions for relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) patients increasingly challenging. We report the final analysis of a single-arm, phase 2 study evaluating the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib combined with daratumumab and dexamethasone (IDd; NCT03439293). Sixty-one RRMM patients (ixazomib/daratumumab-naïve; 1-3 prior therapies) were enrolled to receive IDd (28-day cycles) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Median age was 69 years; 14.8% of patients had International Staging System stage III disease; 14.8% had received three prior therapies. Patients received a median of 16 cycles of IDd. In 59 response-evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 64.4%; the confirmed ≥very good partial response (VGPR) rate (primary endpoint) was 30.5%. Rates of ≥VGPR in patient subgroups were: high-risk cytogenetics (n = 15, 26.7%), expanded high-risk cytogenetics (n = 24, 29.2%), aged ≥75 years (n = 12, 16.7%), lenalidomide-refractory (n = 21, 28.6%), and prior PI/IMiD therapy (n = 58, 31.0%). With a median follow-up of 31.6 months, median progression-free survival was 16.8 months (95% confidence interval: 10.1-23.7). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 54.1% of patients; 44.3% had serious TEAEs; TEAEs led to dose modifications/reductions/discontinuations in 62.3%/36.1%/16.4%. There were five on-study deaths. Any-grade and grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 18.0% and 1.6% of patients. Quality of life was generally maintained throughout treatment. IDd showed a positive risk-benefit profile in RRMM patients and was active in clinically relevant subgroups with no new safety signals.

• MeSH
• dexamethason * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• glycin * analogy a deriváty   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• recidiva MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• sloučeniny boru * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH