OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of short-term inhalational exposure to nanoparticles released during dental composite grinding on oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers were examined before and after exposure in dental workshop. They spent 76.8 ± 0.7 min in the testing room during grinding of dental nanocomposites. The individual exposure to aerosol particles in each participant´s breathing zones was monitored using a personal nanoparticle sampler (PENS). Exhaled breath condensate (EBC), blood, and urine samples were collected pre- and post-exposure to measure one oxidative stress marker, i.e., thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and two biomarkers of antioxidant capacity, i.e., ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and reduced glutathione (GSH) by spectrophotometry. Spirometry and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were used to evaluate the effect of acute inhalational exposure. RESULTS: Mean mass of dental nanocomposite ground away was 0.88 ± 0.32 g. Average individual doses of respirable particles and nanoparticles measured by PENS were 380 ± 150 and 3.3 ± 1.3 μg, respectively. No significant increase of the post-exposure oxidative stress marker TBARS in EBC and plasma was seen. No decrease in antioxidant capacity biomarkers FRAP and GSH in EBC post-exposure was seen, either. Post-exposure, conjunctival hyperemia was seen in 62.5% volunteers; however, no impairment in spirometry or FeNO results was observed. No correlation of any biomarker measured with individual exposure was found, however, several correlations with interfering factors (age, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and environmental pollution parameters) were seen. CONCLUSIONS: This study, using oxidative stress biomarker and antioxidant capacity biomarkers in biological fluids of volunteers during the grinding of dental nanocomposites did not prove a negative effect of this intense short-term exposure. However, further studies are needed to evaluate oxidative stress in long-term exposure of both stomatologists and patients and diverse populations with varying health statuses.

Department of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic

Department of Occupational Medicine 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Military Health Sciences University of Defense Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

Institute of Dental Medicine 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Experimental Medicine of the Czech Academy of Sciences Department of Nanotoxicology and Molecular Epidemiology Prague Czech Republic

J Heyrovsky Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Shin N, Drapcho J, Aich N, et al. Quantification and characterization of nanometer-sized particles released from dental composite products using a multimodal approach. J Nanopart Res. 2020;22:345. doi: 10.1007/s11051-020-05078-0. DOI

Lang A, Ovsenik M, Verdenik I, et al. Nanoparticle concentrations and composition in a dental office and dental laboratory: a pilot study on the influence of working procedures. J Occup Env Hyg. 2018;15:441–447. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1432864. PubMed DOI

Polednik B. Aerosol and bioaerosol particles in a dental office. Environ Res. 2014;134:405–409. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.06.027. PubMed DOI

Din AR, Hindocha A, Patel T, et al. Quantitative analysis of particulate matter release during orthodontic procedures: a pilot study. Br Dent J. 2020:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2280-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Bogdan A, Buckett MI, Japuntich DA. Nano-sized aerosol classification, collection and analysis–method development using dental composite materials. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11:415–426. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.875183. PubMed DOI

Bradna P, Ondrackova L, Zdimal V, et al. Detection of nanoparticles released at finishing of dental composite materials. Monatsh Chem. 2017;148:531–537. doi: 10.1007/s00706-016-1912-6. DOI

Van Landuyt KL, Hellack B, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Nanoparticle release from dental composites. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:365–374. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.044. PubMed DOI

Camassa LMA, Ervik TK, Zegeye FD, et al. Characterization and toxicity evaluation of air-borne particles released by grinding from two dental resin composites in vitro. Dent Mater. 2021;37:1121–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.011. PubMed DOI

Schmalz G, Hickel R, van Landuyt KL, et al. Nanoparticles in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2017;33:1298–1314. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.08.193. PubMed DOI

Jiang ES, Moon W, Lim BS, et al. Cytotoxicity and reactive oxygen species production induced by different co-monomer eluted from nanohybrid dental composites. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:55. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02710-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Volk J, Engelmann J, Leyhausen G, et al. Effects of three resin monomers on the cellular glutathione concentration of cultured human gingival fibroblasts. Dent Mater. 2006;22:499–505. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.06.002. PubMed DOI

Canu IG, Plys E, Creze CV, et al. A harmonized protocol for an international multicenter prospective study of nanotechnology workers: the NanoExplore cohort. Nanotoxicology. 2023;17:1–19. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2023.2180220. PubMed DOI

Ghafari J, Moghadasi N, Shekaftik SO. Oxidative stress induced by occupational exposure to nanomaterials: a systematic review. Ind Health. 2020;58:492–502. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2020-0073. PubMed DOI PMC

Najahi-Missaoui W, Arnold RD, Cummings BS. Safe nanoparticles: are we there yet? Int J Mol Med Sci. 2021;22:385. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010385. PubMed DOI PMC

De Leon JAD, Borges CR. Evaluation of oxidative stress in biological samples using the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances assay. Jove—J Vis Exp. 2020;(159) doi: 10.3791/61122. PubMed DOI PMC

Benzie IFF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of ‘antioxidant power’: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996;239:70–76. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292. PubMed DOI

Schulz JB, Lindenau J, Seyfried J, et al. Glutathione, oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:4904–4911. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01595.x. PubMed DOI

Eteshola EOU, Haupt DA, Koos SI, et al. The role of metal ion binding in the antioxidant mechanisms of reduced and oxidized glutathione in metal-mediated oxidative DNA damage. Metallomics. 2020;12:79–91. doi: 10.1039/c9mt00231f. PubMed DOI

Schmalz G, Hickel R, van Landuyt KL, et al. Scientific update on nanoparticles in dentistry. Int Dent J. 2018;68:299–305. doi: 10.1111/idj.12394. PubMed DOI PMC

Pelclova D, Zdimal V, Komarc M, et al. Three-year study of markers of oxidative stress in exhaled breath condensate in workers producing nanocomposites, extended by plasma and urine analysis in last two years. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:2440. doi: 10.3390/nano10122440. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhang YP, Bello A, Ryan DK, et al. Elevated urinary biomarkers of oxidative damage in photocopier operators following acute and chronic exposures. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:715. doi: 10.3390/nano12040715. PubMed DOI PMC

Pelclova D, Zdimal V, Kacer P, et al. Oxidative stress markers are elevated in exhaled breath condensate of workers exposed to nanoparticles during iron oxide pigment production. J Breath Res. 2016;10 doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/1/016004. PubMed DOI

Pelclova D, Zdimal V, Kacer P, et al. Markers of lipid oxidative damage in the exhaled breath condensate of nano TiO2 production workers. Nanotoxicology. 2017;11:52–63. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2016.1262921. PubMed DOI

Sati PC, Khaliq F, Vaney N, et al. Pulmonary function and oxidative stress in workers exposed to styrene in plastic factory: occupational hazards in styrene-exposed plastic factory workers. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011;30:1743–1750. doi: 10.1177/0960327111401436. PubMed DOI

Pelclova D, Zdimal V, Komarc M, et al. Deep airway inflammation and respiratory disorders in nanocomposite workers. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:731. doi: 10.3390/nano8090731. PubMed DOI PMC

Tsai CJ, Liu CN, Hung SM, et al. Novel active personal nanoparticle sampler for the exposure assessment of nanoparticles in workplaces. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:4546–4552. doi: 10.1021/es204580f. PubMed DOI

Hillamo RE, Kauppinen EI. On the performance of the Berner low-pressure impactor. Aerosol Sci Technol. 1991;14:33–47. doi: 10.1080/02786829108959469. DOI

Stefancova L, Schwarz J, Makela T, et al. Comprehensive characterization of original 10-stage and 7-stage modified Berner type impactors. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2011;45:88–100. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2010.524266. DOI

Sioutas C. A pilot study to characterize fine particles in the environment of an automotive machining facility. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1999;14:246–254. doi: 10.1080/104732299303025. PubMed DOI

Horvath I, Barnes PJ, Loukides S, et al. A European Respiratory Society technical standard: exhaled biomarkers in lung disease. Eur Resp J. 2017;49 doi: 10.1183/13993003.00965-2016. PubMed DOI

ATS/ERS ATS/ERS recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:912–930. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200406-710ST. PubMed DOI

Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Resp J. 2005;26:319–338. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805. PubMed DOI

Shah AS, Ahmed M, Alkreathy HM, et al. Phytochemical screening and protective effects of Trifolium alexandrinum (L.) against free radical-induced stress in rats. Food Sci Nutr. 2014;2:751–757. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.152. PubMed DOI PMC

Pohanka M. Postponed effect of neostigmine on oxidative homeostasis. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2014;7:134–138. doi: 10.2478/intox-2014-0018. PubMed DOI PMC

Eyer P, Worek F, Kiderlen D, et al. Molar absorption coefficients for the reduced Ellman reagent: reassessment. Anal Biochem. 2003;312:224–227. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00506-7. PubMed DOI

Kretzschmar M, Muller D. Aging, training and exercise – a review of effects on plasma glutathione and lipid peroxides. Sports Med. 1993;15:196–209. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199315030-00005. PubMed DOI

Nyberg M, Mortensen SP, Cabo H, et al. Roles of sedentary aging and lifelong physical activity in exchange of glutathione across exercising human skeletal muscle. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;73:166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.05.008. PubMed DOI

Turcu V, Wild P, Hemmendinger M, et al. Towards reference values for malondialdehyde on exhaled breath condensate: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Toxics. 2022;10:258. doi: 10.3390/toxics10050258. PubMed DOI PMC

Staruchova M, Collins AR, Volkovova K, et al. Occupational exposure to mineral fibres. Biomarkers of oxidative damage and antioxidant defence and associations with DNA damage and repair. Mutagenesis. 2008;23:249–260. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gen004. PubMed DOI

Klusackova P, Lischkova L, Kolesnikova V, et al. Elevated glutathione in workers exposed to engineered nanoparticles due to potential adaptation to oxidative stress. Nanomedicine. 2024;19:185–198. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2023-0207. PubMed DOI

Iliadi A, Koletsi D, Eliades T, et al. Particulate production and composite dust during routine dental procedures. A systematic review with meta-analyses. Materials. 2020;13:2513. doi: 10.3390/ma13112513. PubMed DOI PMC

Cokic SM, Ghosh M, Hoet P, et al. Cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of respirable fraction of composite dust on human bronchial cells. Dent Mater. 2020;36:270–283. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.009. PubMed DOI

Berniyanti T, Palupi R, Kriswandini IL, et al. Suitability of MDA, 8-OHdG and wild-type p53 as genotoxic biomarkers in metal (Co, Ni and Cr) exposed dental technicians: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:65. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1049-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Yildiz M, Alp HH, Gül P, et al. Lipid peroxidation and DNA oxidation caused by dental filling materials. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2017;12:233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.02.002. PubMed DOI PMC

Luo XG, Xie DL, Hu JC, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers for populations with occupational exposure to nanomaterials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antioxidants. 2022;11:2182. doi: 10.3390/antiox11112182. PubMed DOI PMC

Iavicoli I, Fontana L, Leso V, et al. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide and nanomaterial exposure in workplaces. Curr Med Chem. 2020;27:7200–7212. doi: 10.2174/0929867327666200320154545. PubMed DOI

Cokic SM, Asbach C, De Munck J, et al. The effect of water spray on the release of composite nano-dust. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:2403–2414. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03100-x. PubMed DOI