Machine learning-based prognostic subgrouping of glioblastoma: A multicenter study
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
Grant support
U01CA242871
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA264017
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U01 CA242871
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U24CA189523
NCI NIH HHS - United States
U24 CA189523
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01CA269948
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA277728
NCI NIH HHS - United States
NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA269948
NCI NIH HHS - United States
I01 BX005842
BLRD VA - United States
PubMed
39665363
PubMed Central
PMC12083074
DOI
10.1093/neuonc/noae260
PII: 7922273
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- glioblastoma, machine learning, mpMRI, prognostic subgrouping, survival,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Glioblastoma * pathology classification mortality diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Brain Neoplasms * pathology classification mortality diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Machine Learning * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive adult primary brain cancer, characterized by significant heterogeneity, posing challenges for patient management, treatment planning, and clinical trial stratification. METHODS: We developed a highly reproducible, personalized prognostication, and clinical subgrouping system using machine learning (ML) on routine clinical data, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and molecular measures from 2838 demographically diverse patients across 22 institutions and 3 continents. Patients were stratified into favorable, intermediate, and poor prognostic subgroups (I, II, and III) using Kaplan-Meier analysis (Cox proportional model and hazard ratios [HR]). RESULTS: The ML model stratified patients into distinct prognostic subgroups with HRs between subgroups I-II and I-III of 1.62 (95% CI: 1.43-1.84, P < .001) and 3.48 (95% CI: 2.94-4.11, P < .001), respectively. Analysis of imaging features revealed several tumor properties contributing unique prognostic value, supporting the feasibility of a generalizable prognostic classification system in a diverse cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our ML model demonstrates extensive reproducibility and online accessibility, utilizing routine imaging data rather than complex imaging protocols. This platform offers a unique approach to personalized patient management and clinical trial stratification in GBM.
B ARGO Group Institut Investigació Germans Trias i Pujol Catalonia Spain
Biostatistics Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
Brain and Tumor Neurosurgery Neurosurgical Oncology Piedmont Health Atlanta Georgia USA
Brain Tumor Center Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System Seoul Republic of Korea
Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States Hinsdale Illinois USA
Department of Bioengineering School of Engineering Santa Clara University Santa Clara California USA
Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA
Department of Neurological Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA
Department of Neurological Surgery Okayama University Okayama Japan
Department of Neurology The University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA
Department of Neuropathology Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Camperdown Australia
Department of Neuroradiology Ruskin Wing King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK
Department of Neuroradiology Technical University of Munich Munchen Germany
Department of Neurosurgery Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Camperdown Australia
Department of Neurosurgery Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Shizuoka Japan
Department of Neurosurgery New York University Langone Health New York New York USA
Department of Neurosurgery University Hospital Río Hortega Valladolid Spain
Department of Neurosurgery University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA
Department of Neurosurgery University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston Texas USA
Department of Neurosurgery Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
Department of Radiation Oncology Christiana Care Health System Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
Department of Radiology Duke University Durham North Carolina USA
Department of Radiology Henry Ford Health System Detroit Michigan USA
Department of Radiology Hospital Clínic and IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
Department of Radiology Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czechia
Department of Radiology New York University Langone Health New York New York USA
Department of Radiology University of California San Diego San Diego California USA
Department of Radiology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
Department of Radiology University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA
Department of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St Louis Missouri USA
Department of Radiology Yonsei University College of Medicine Seoul Republic of Korea
Division of Neurosurgery Spedali Riuniti di Livorno Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest Livorno Italy
Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Camperdown Australia
Hillman Cancer Center University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
MD Anderson Cancer Center University of Texas Houston Texas USA
Research Unit Image Diagnosis Institute Badalona Spain
School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences King's College London London UK
Sidney Kimmel Medical College Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
Tata Memorial Centre Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai India
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool UK
Trans Divisional Research Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda Maryland USA
See more in PubMed
Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Waite K, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro-Oncol. 2021;23(12 Suppl 2):iii1–iii105. PubMed PMC
Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, et al. Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(23):2306–2316. PubMed PMC
Board WCoTE. WHO Classification of Tumours. Vol 6. 5th ed. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.
Telloni SM. Tumor staging and grading: a primer. In: Espina V, ed. Molecular Profiling: Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2017:1–17. PubMed
Ludwig JA, Weinstein JN. Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(11):845–856. PubMed
Kunstman JW. Artificial intelligence in cancer staging: limitless potential or passing fad? Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(4):978–979. PubMed
Bi WL, Hosny A, Schabath MB, et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(2):127–157. PubMed PMC
Isensee F, Kickingereder P, Wick W, Bendszus M, Maier-Hein KH. Brain tumor segmentation and radiomics survival prediction: contribution to the brats 2017 challenge. Paper presented at: International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop 2017. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Zhou M, Scott J, Chaudhury B, et al. Radiomics in brain tumor: image assessment, quantitative feature descriptors, and machine-learning approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(2):208–216. PubMed PMC
Macyszyn L, Akbari H, Pisapia JM, et al. Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques. Neuro-Oncol. 2015;18(3):417–425. PubMed PMC
Bakas S, Shukla G, Akbari H, et al. Overall survival prediction in glioblastoma patients using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): advanced radiomic features may compensate for lack of advanced MRI modalities. J Med Imaging. 2020;7(3):031505. PubMed PMC
Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, et al. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(6):1045–1057. PubMed PMC
Bakas S, Akbari H, Sotiras A, et al. Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Sci Data. 2017;4(1):170117. PubMed PMC
Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, et al. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(10):1993–2024. PubMed PMC
Bakas S, Reyes M, Jakab A, et al. Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the BRATS challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02629. 2018;3(1):1–49.
Davatzikos C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Bakas S, et al. AI-based prognostic imaging biomarkers for precision neuro-oncology: the ReSPOND consortium. Neuro-Oncol. 2020;22(6):886–888. PubMed PMC
Nabors LB, Portnow J, Ammirati M, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: central nervous system cancers, version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(11):1331–1345. PubMed
Brown TJ, Brennan MC, Li M, et al. Association of the extent of resection with survival in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(11):1460–1469. PubMed PMC
Shen D, Davatzikos C. HAMMER: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21(11):1421–1439. PubMed
Yushkevich PA, Pluta J, Wang H, et al. IC-P-174: fast automatic segmentation of hippocampal subfields and medial temporal lobe sub//regions In 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla T2-Weighted MRI. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(7S_Part_2):P126–P127.
Sharma A, Graber JJ. Overview of prognostic factors in adult gliomas. Ann Palliat Med. 2020;10(1):863–874. PubMed
Schaff LR, Mellinghoff IK. Glioblastoma and other primary brain malignancies in adults: a review. JAMA. 2023;329(7):574–587. PubMed PMC
Fyllingen EH, Bø LE, Reinertsen I, et al. Survival of glioblastoma in relation to tumor location: a statistical tumor atlas of a population-based cohort. Acta Neurochir. 2021;163(7):1895–1905. PubMed PMC
Comas S, Luguera E, Molero J, et al. Influence of glioblastoma contact with the subventricular zone on survival and recurrence patterns. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021;23(3):554–564. PubMed
Saito T, Muragaki Y, Maruyama T, et al. Influence of wide opening of the lateral ventricle on survival for supratentorial glioblastoma patients with radiotherapy and concomitant temozolomide-based chemotherapy. Neurosurg Rev. 2020;43(6):1583–1593. PubMed
Picart T, Dumot C, Meyronet D, et al.; French Brain Tumor DataBase. Characteristics and management of hydrocephalus in adult patients with cerebellar glioblastoma: lessons from a French nationwide series of 118 cases. Neurosurg Rev. 2022;45(1):683–699. PubMed
Thakkar JP, Kumthekar P, Dixit KS, Stupp R, Lukas RV. Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors. J Neurol Sci. 2020;411(116706):1–10. PubMed
Castro BA, Imber BS, Chen R, McDermott MW, Aghi MK. Ventriculoperitoneal shunting for glioblastoma: risk factors, indications, and efficacy. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(3):421–430. PubMed PMC
Chang C-C, Lin C-J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2011;2(3):1–27.
Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15(4):361–387. PubMed
Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of survival data. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2018.
Kazerooni AF, Akbari H, Shukla G, et al. Cancer Imaging Phenomics via CaPTk: multi-institutional prediction of progression-free survival and pattern of recurrence in glioblastoma. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020;4(1):234–244. PubMed PMC
Fathi Kazerooni A, Bagley SJ, Akbari H, et al. Applications of radiomics and radiogenomics in high-grade gliomas in the era of precision medicine. Cancers. 2021;13(23):5921. PubMed PMC
Fathi Kazerooni A, Saxena S, Toorens E, et al. Clinical measures, radiomics, and genomics offer synergistic value in AI-based prediction of overall survival in patients with glioblastoma. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–13. PubMed PMC
Bilello M, Akbari H, Da X, et al. Population-based MRI atlases of spatial distribution are specific to patient and tumor characteristics in glioblastoma. NeuroImage Clinical. 2016;12:34–40. PubMed PMC
Lou C, Habes M, Illenberger NA, et al. Leveraging machine learning predictive biomarkers to augment the statistical power of clinical trials with baseline magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Commun. 2021;3(4):fcab264. PubMed PMC
Huse JT, Holland EC. Targeting brain cancer: advances in the molecular pathology of malignant glioma and medulloblastoma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(5):319–331. PubMed
Lee JH, Lee JE, Kahng JY, et al. Human glioblastoma arises from subventricular zone cells with low-level driver mutations. Nature. 2018;560(7717):243–247. PubMed
Gorlia T, van den Bent MJ, Hegi ME, et al. Nomograms for predicting survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: prognostic factor analysis of EORTC and NCIC trial 26981-22981/CE.3. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(1):29–38. PubMed
Li H, He Y, Huang L, Luo H, Zhu X. The nomogram model predicting overall survival and guiding clinical decision in patients with glioblastoma based on the SEER Database. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1051. PubMed PMC
Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, DeMatteo RP. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):e173–e180. PubMed PMC
Mazurowski MA, Desjardins A, Malof JM. Imaging descriptors improve the predictive power of survival models for glioblastoma patients. Neuro-Oncol. 2013;15(10):1389–1394. PubMed PMC
Bae S, Choi YS, Ahn SS, et al. Radiomic MRI phenotyping of glioblastoma: improving survival prediction. Radiology. 2018;289(3):797–806. PubMed
Zhang Z, Jiang H, Chen X, et al. Identifying the survival subtypes of glioblastoma by quantitative volumetric analysis of MRI. J Neurooncol. 2014;119(1):207–214. PubMed
Gutman DA, Cooper LA, Hwang SN, et al. MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set. Radiology. 2013;267(2):560–569. PubMed PMC
Mazurowski MA, Zhang J, Peters KB, Hobbs H. Computer-extracted MR imaging features are associated with survival in glioblastoma patients. J Neurooncol. 2014;120(3):483–488. PubMed
Ramakrishna R, Barber J, Kennedy G, et al. Imaging features of invasion and preoperative and postoperative tumor burden in previously untreated glioblastoma: correlation with survival. Surg Neurol Int. 2010;1(40):1–12. PubMed PMC
Mohan S, Wang S, Coban G, et al. Detection of occult neoplastic infiltration in the corpus callosum and prediction of overall survival in patients with glioblastoma using diffusion tensor imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019;112:106–111. PubMed
Varn FS, Johnson KC, Martinek J, et al.; GLASS Consortium. Glioma progression is shaped by genetic evolution and microenvironment interactions. Cell. 2022;185(12):2184–2199.e16. PubMed PMC
Klughammer J, Kiesel B, Roetzer T, et al. The DNA methylation landscape of glioblastoma disease progression shows extensive heterogeneity in time and space. Nat Med. 2018;24(10):1611–1624. PubMed PMC