Life satisfaction around the world: Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) across 65 nations, 40 languages, gender identities, and age groups
Language English Country United States Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
39841629
PubMed Central
PMC11753666
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0313107
PII: PONE-D-24-38617
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Factor Analysis, Statistical MeSH
- Gender Identity * MeSH
- Language MeSH
- Quality of Life MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Personal Satisfaction * MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Psychometrics methods MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Age Factors MeSH
- Self Report MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) is a widely used self-report measure of subjective well-being, but studies of its measurement invariance across a large number of nations remain limited. Here, we utilised the Body Image in Nature (BINS) dataset-with data collected between 2020 and 2022 -to assess measurement invariance of the SWLS across 65 nations, 40 languages, gender identities, and age groups (N = 56,968). All participants completed the SWLS under largely uniform conditions. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis indicated that configural and metric invariance was upheld across all nations, languages, gender identities, and age groups, suggesting that the unidimensional SWLS model has universal applicability. Full scalar invariance was achieved across gender identities and age groups. Based on alignment optimisation methods, partial scalar invariance was achieved across all but three national groups and across all languages represented in the BINS. There were large differences in latent SWLS means across nations and languages, but negligible-to-small differences across gender identities and age groups. Across nations, greater life satisfaction was significantly associated with greater financial security and being in a committed relationship or married. The results of this study suggest that the SWLS largely assesses a common unidimensional construct of life satisfaction irrespective of respondent characteristics (i.e., national group, gender identities, and age group) or survey presentation (i.e., survey language). This has important implications for the assessment of life satisfaction across nations and provides information that will be useful for practitioners aiming to promote subjective well-being internationally.
Applied Science Research Center Applied Science Private University Amman Jordan
Central Department of Psychology Tribhuvan University Kathmandu Nepal
Centre for Psychological Medicine Perdana University Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
CentroSan Isidoro University Center Seville Spain
Colegio de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ Quito Ecuador
Colegio de Comunicación y Artes Contemporáneas Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ Quito Ecuador
Comenzar de Nuevo Treatment Center Monterrey México
Department of Art Studies Tarbiat Modares University Tehran Iran
Department of Biomedical Sciences University of Padova Padova Italy
Department of Business Administration Reykjavik University Reykjavik Iceland
Department of Clinical Psychology United Arab Emirates University Al Ain United Arab Emirates
Department of Consumer Behavior University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Department of Counselling Psychology and Social Welfare Handong Global University Pohang South Korea
Department of Dermatology Venereology and Andrology Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt
Department of Education University of Almería Almería Spain
Department of Evolutionary Anthropology University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of General Education Disciplines Astana IT University Astana Kazakhstan
Department of General Psychology University of Padova Padova Italy
Department of General Studies The Polytechnic Ibadan Nigeria
Department of Health Physical Education and Recreation University of Cape Coast Cape Coast Ghana
Department of Health Sciences DePaul University Chicago Illinois United States of America
Department of Leadership and Organizational Behaviour Norwegian Business School Oslo Norway
Department of Management Ahmed Bin Mohammad Military College Doha Qatar
Department of Management University of Agder Kristiansand Norway
Department of Midwifery Faculty of Health Sciences Bartın University Bartın Türkiye
Department of Nursing Faculty of Health Sciences Yalova University Yalova Türkiye
Department of Nutrition University of Ribeirão Preto Ribeirão Preto Brazil
Department of Physical Education São Judas Tadeu University São Paulo Brazil
Department of Physiology Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Puducherry India
Department of Psychiatry University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom
Department of Psychiatry University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan United States of America
Department of Psychoeducation and Psychology Université du Québec en Outaouais Saint Jérôme Canada
Department of Psychology Aberystwyth University Ceredigion United Kingdom
Department of Psychology Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Iași Romania
Department of Psychology and Behavioural Studies Ekiti State University Ado Ekiti Nigeria
Department of Psychology Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai Zhuhai China
Department of Psychology College of Education Sultan Qaboos University Muscat Oman
Department of Psychology D A 5 College Muzaffarnagar India
Department of Psychology De La Salle University Manila Philippines
Department of Psychology Eskişehir Osmangazi University Eskişehir Türkiye
Department of Psychology Faculty of Arts Menoufia University Shebin el Kom Egypt
Department of Psychology Faculty of Human Science University of Maragheh Maragheh Iran
Department of Psychology Faculty of Philosophy University of Novi Sad Novi Sad Serbia
Department of Psychology FAMNIT University of Primorska Koper Slovenia
Department of Psychology Islamic Azad University Bandar Gaz Iran
Department of Psychology Kashi Naresh Government Post Graduate College Gyanpur India
Department of Psychology Koc University Istanbul Türkiye
Department of Psychology Koç University Istanbul Türkiye
Department of Psychology Kyungnam University Changwon South Korea
Department of Psychology Lingnan University Hong Kong China
Department of Psychology Massey University Auckland New Zealand
Department of Psychology Middlesex University Dubai Dubai United Arab Emirates
Department of Psychology National Chung Cheng University Chia Yi Taiwan
Department of Psychology Neapolis University Pafos Paphos Cyprus
Department of Psychology Saint Mary's University Halifax Canada
Department of Psychology Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
Department of Psychology Soochow University Taipei Taiwan
Department of Psychology The Ohio State University Ohio Columbus United States of America
Department of Psychology Universidad del Norte Barranquilla Colombia
Department of Psychology Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta Indonesia
Department of Psychology Université du Québec à Trois Rivières Trois Rivières Canada
Department of Psychology University of Allahabad Prayagraj India
Department of Psychology University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Caserta Italy
Department of Psychology University of Chittagong Chattogram Bangladesh
Department of Psychology University of Dhaka Dhaka Bangladesh
Department of Psychology University of Essex Colchester United Kingdom
Department of Psychology University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
Department of Psychology University of Ibadan Ibadan Nigeria
Department of Psychology University of Malta Msida Malta
Department of Psychology University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil
Department of Psychology University of Sargodha Sargodha Pakistan
Department of Psychology University of the Andes Bogotá Colombia
Department of Psychology University of Zadar Zadar Croatia
Department of Psychology West University of Timişoara Timişoara Romania
Department of Research Methods and Diagnosis in Education University of València València Spain
Department of Social Sciences Payam Noor University Tehran Iran
Department of Sociology and Social Justice Afe Babalola University Ado Ekiti Nigeria
Department of Sociology and Social Work Al Farabi Kazakh National University Almaty Kazakhstan
Department of Textile and Fashion Design Alzahra University Tehran Iran
Department of Undergraduate Studies Temple University Japan Campus Tokyo Japan
Department of Work and Social Psychology Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
Division of Research Physical Education College of the Brazilian Army Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Doctoral School of Psychology Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary
ÉCOBES Research and Transfer Cégep de Jonquière Québec Canada
Environment and Sustainability Research Initiative Khulna Bangladesh
Environmental Science Discipline Life Science School Khulna University Khulna Bangladesh
Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam Muyuna Ecuador
Faculty of Arts Department of Psychology Charles University Prague Czechia
Faculty of Education Psychology and Art University of Latvia Rīga Latvia
Faculty of Health Professions Al Quds University East Jerusalem Palestine
Faculty of Health School of Psychology Liverpool John Moores University Liverpool United Kingdom
Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Midwifery Munzur University Tunceli Türkiye
Faculty of Health Sciences University of Miskolc Miskolc Hungary
Faculty of Human Sciences University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan
Faculty of Humanities Department of Psychology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai Thailand
Faculty of Legal and Social Sciences Simón Bolívar University Barranquilla Colombia
Faculty of Liberal Arts Department of Psychology Thammasat University Pathumthani Thailand
Faculty of Life Sciences Medical School Hamburg Hamburg Germany
Faculty of Medicine of Monastir Eya Medical Centre Monastir Tunisia
Faculty of Medicine University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia
Faculty of Medicine University of Sousse Sousse Tunisia
Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland
Faculty of Organizational Sciences University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia
Faculty of Psychology and Education Universiti Malaysia Sabah Kota Kinabalu Malaysia
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences University of Porto Porto Portugal
Faculty of Psychology Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand
Faculty of Psychology Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences Athens Greece
Faculty of Psychology Pontifical University of Salamanca Salamanca Spain
Faculty of Public Health Al Quds University East Jerusalem Palestine
Faculty of Social and Humanities University WSB Merito Gdansk Poland
Faculty of Social Sciences University of Palermo Buenos Aires Argentina
Faculty of Social Sciences Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences Valmiera Latvia
Federal Institute of Education Science and Technology of Southeast of Minas Gerais Barbacena Brazil
Graduate Program in Food Nutrition and Food Engineering São Paulo State University São Paulo Brazil
Hertfordshire Business School University of Hertfordshire Hatfield United Kingdom
Human Evolution and Archaeological Sciences University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Human Flourishing Program Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts United States of America
INSPECT LB National Institute of Public Health Clinical Epidemiology and Toxicology Beirut Lebanon
Institute of Anton Martin Slomsek Primary School Montessori Maribor Slovenia
Institute of Pedagogy University of Bielsko Biala Bielsko Biala Poland
Institute of Psychiatry University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
Institute of Psychology Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czechia
Institute of Psychology Marie Curie Skłodowska University Lublin Poland
Institute of Psychology University of Gdańsk Gdańsk Poland
Institute of Psychology University of Pécs Pécs Hungary
Institute of Psychology University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
Institute of Psychology University of Wrocław Wrocław Poland
Institute of Social Sciences of the Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences Košice Slovakia
Institute of Social Sciences Universidad de O'Higgins Rancagua Chile
Institute of Zoology Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia
International Centre for Psychological Counselling and Social Research Puducherry India
KOSHISH National Mental Health Self Help Organization Kusunti Lalitpur Nepal
Laboratory of Social Psychology Aix Marseille University Aix en Provence France
Life Science Research Centre Simón Bolívar University Barranquilla Colombia
M M D Public School Brahmpuri Muzaffarnagar India
Management Department College of Business Administration A'Sharqiyah University Ibra Oman
Max Planck Institute for Human Development Berlin Germany
Physical Education Unit Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
Practice for Psychotherapy Am Krautacker 25 Travemünde Germany
Regional Department for Eating Disorders Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
Royal College of Surgeons Ireland Bahrain Adliya Bahrain
Sakarya Business School Sakarya University Sakarya Türkiye
School of Applied Psychology Griffith University Gold Coast Australia
School of Applied Psychology University College Cork Cork Ireland
School of Behavioral Sciences The Academic College of Tel Aviv Yaffo Tel Aviv Yafo Israel
School of Health University of the Sunshine Coast Moreton Bay Australia
School of Medicine and Medical Sciences Holy Spirit University of Kaslik Jounieh Lebanon
School of Pharmacy Lebanese International University Beirut Lebanon
School of Psychological Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
School of Psychology Deakin University Geelong Australia
School of Psychology Sport and Sensory Sciences Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge United Kingdom
School of Psychology Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez Penalolen Chile
School of Psychology University of Nottingham Malaysia Semenyih Malaysia
School of Social Sciences Heriot Watt University Malaysia Putrajaya Malaysia
School of Social Work University of Missouri Columbia Missouri United States of America
Scientific Institute for Research and Healthcare Santa Lucia Foundation Rome Italy
Slovene Centre for Suicide Research Andrej Marusic Institute University of Primorska Koper Slovenia
Unità Operativa Complessa Hospital Psychology Padova University Hospital Padova Italy
Vice rectory for Teaching Research and Extension Universida Latina de Costa Rica San José Costa Rica
See more in PubMed
Diener E, Oishi S, Tay L. Advances in subjective well-being research. Nat Human Behav. 2018;2(4):253–260. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6 PubMed DOI
Diener E, Lucas RE, Oishi S. Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra Psychol. 2018;4(1):15. doi: 10.1525/collabra.115 PubMed DOI PMC
Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychol Assess. 1993;5(2):164–172. https://doi.org.10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164
Busseri MA. Examining the structure of subjective well-being through meta-analysis of the associations among positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction. Pers Ind Diff 2018;122:68–71. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.003 DOI
Pavot W, Diener E. The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. J Pos Psychol. 2008;3(2):137–152. 10.1080/17439760701756946 DOI
Andersen NK, Wimmelmann CL, Mortensen EL, Flensborg-Madsen T. Longitudinal associations of self-reported satisfaction with life and vitality with risk of mortality. J Psychosom Res 2018;147:110529. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110529 PubMed DOI
Diener E. New findings and future directions for well-being research. Am Psychol. 2012;67(8):590–597. 10.1037/a0029541 PubMed DOI
Erdogan B, Bauer TN, Truxillo DM, Mansfield LR. Whistle while you work: A review of the life satisfaction literature. J Management. 2012;38(4):1038–1083. 10.1177/0149206311429379 DOI
Proctor CL, Linley PA, Maltby J. Youth life satisfaction: A review of the literature. J Happiness Stud. 2019;10(5):583–630. 10.1007/s10902-008-9110-9 DOI
Voukelatou V, Gabrielli L, Miliou I, Cresci S, Sharma R, Tesconi M, Pappalardo L. Measuring objective and subjective well-being: Dimensions and data sources. Int J Data Sci Analytics. 2021;11:279–309. 10.1007/s41060-020-00224-2 DOI
Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 PubMed DOI
Kjell ONE, Diener E. Abbreviated three-item versions of the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the Harmony in Life Scale yield as strong psychometric properties as the original scales. J Pers Assess. 2021;103(2):183–194. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1737093 PubMed DOI
Pavot W. Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): An overview. In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. Pp. 5659–5661. 10.1007/978-84-007-0753_2576 DOI
Jovanović V. The validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents and a comparison with single-item life satisfaction measures: A preliminary study. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:3173–3180. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1331-5 PubMed DOI
Jovanović V, Lazić M, Gavrilov-Jerković V. Measuring life satisfaction among psychiatric patients: Measurement invariance and validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017;27(3):378–383. 10.1002/cpp.2434 PubMed DOI
Slocum-Gori SL, Zumbo BD, Michalos AC, Diener E. A note on the dimensionality of quality of life scales: An illustration with the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Soc Indicators Res. 2009;92(3):489–496. https://doi.org/10.1007s11205-008-9303-y
Vassar M. A note on the score reliability for the Satisfaction with Life Scale: An RG study. Soc Indicators Res. 2008;86(1):47–57. 10.1007/s11205-007-9113-7 DOI
Pretorius TB, Padmanabhannuni A. Assessing the cognitive component of subjective well-being: Revisiting the Satisfaction with Life Scale with classical test theory and item response theory. Af J Psychol Assess. 2022;4:a106. 10.4102/ajopa.v4i0.106 DOI
Checa I, Di Marco D, Bohórquez MR. Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale by sexual orientation. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51:2891–2897. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02240-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Glaesmer H, Grande G, Braehle E, Roth M. The German version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Euro J Psychol Assess. 2011;27(2):127–132. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000058 DOI
Joshanloo M. Do cross-group differences in life satisfaction reflect measurement bias or true differences in life satisfaction? Evidence from a Dutch national sample. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2022;19(18):11687. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811687 PubMed DOI PMC
Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T. Psychometric evaluation of the Malay Satisfaction with Life Scale. Soc Indicators Res. 2009;92(1):25–33. 10.1007/s11205-008-9295-7 DOI
Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Org Res Method. 2000;3(1):4–70. 10.1177/109442810031002 DOI
Boer D, Hanke K, He J. On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. J Cross-Cultur Psychol. 2008;49(5):713–734. 10.1177/0022022117749042 DOI
Chen FF. What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;95(5):1005–1018. doi: 10.1037/a0013193 PubMed DOI
Swami V, Barron D. Translation and validation of body image instruments: Challenges, good practice guidelines, and reporting recommendations for test adaptation. Body Im. 2019;31:204–220. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014 PubMed DOI
Guenole N, Brown A. The consequences of ignoring measurement invariance for path coefficients in structural equation models. Frontiers Psychol. 2014;5:980. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00980 PubMed DOI PMC
Wells CS. Assessing measurement invariance for applied research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.
Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structur Equa Model. 2007;14(3):464–504. 10.1080/10705510701301834 DOI
Putnick DK, Bornstein MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev. 2016;41:71–90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 PubMed DOI PMC
Esnaola I, Benito M, Antonio-Agirre I, Ballina E, Lorenzo M. Gender, age, and cross-cultural differences in life satisfaction: A comparison between Spain and Mexico. Child Indicators Res. 2018;12:1935–1949. 10.1007/s12187-018-9616-6 DOI
Schnettler B, Miranda-Zapata E, Sánchez M, Orellana L, Lobos G, Adasme-Berríos C, Sepúlveda J, Hueche C. Invarianza de medida transcultural en la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en estudiantes universitarios de Chile y España [Cross-cultural measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Chilean and Spanish university students]. Suma Psicológica. 2021;28(2):128–134. 10.14349/sumapsi.2021.v28.n2.8 DOI
Bieda A, Hirschfeld G, Schönfeld P, Brailovskaia J, Zhang XC, Margraf J. Universal happiness? Cross-cultural measurement invariance of scales assessing positive mental health. Psychol Assess. 2017;29(4):408–421. doi: 10.1037/pas0000353 PubMed DOI
Dimitrova R, del Carmen DEA. Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Argentina, Mexico and Nicaragua. Soc Inq Well-Being. 2015;1(1):32–39. 10.1013165/SIIW-15-1-1-04 DOI
Whisman MA, Judd CM. A cross-national analysis of measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(2):239–244. doi: 10.1037/pas0000181 PubMed DOI
Jovanović V, Brdar I. The cross-national measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a sample of undergraduate students. Pers Ind Diff. 2018;128:7–9. 10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.010 DOI
Emerson SD, Guhn M, Gadermann AM. Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Reviewing three decades of research. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(9):2251–2264. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2 PubMed DOI
Esnaola I, Benito M, Antonio-Agirre I, Freeman J, Sarasa M. Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) by country, gender, and age. Psicothema. 2017;29(4):596–601. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.394 PubMed DOI
Schnettler B, Miranda-Zapata E, Lobos G, del Carmen Lapo M, Adasme-Berrios C, & Hueche C. Measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Chilean and Ecuadorian older adults. Pers Ind Diff. 2017;110:96–101. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.036 DOI
Jang S, Kim ES, Cao C, Allen TD, Cooper CL, Lapierre LM, O’Driscoll MP, Sanchez JI, Spector PE, Poelmans SAY, Abarca N, Alexandrova M, Antoniou A-S, Beham B, Brough P, Carikci I, Ferreiro P, Fraile G, Geurts S, … Woo J-M. Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale across 26 countries. J Cross-Cultur Psychol. 2017;48(4):560–576. 10.1177/0022022117697844 DOI
Jovanović V, Rudnev M, Arslan G, Buzea C, Dimitrova R, Góngora V, Guse T, Ho RTH, Iqbal N, Jámbori S, Jhang F-H, Kaniušonytė G, Li J, Lim Y-J, Lodi E, Mannerström R, Marcionetti J, Neto F, Osin E, … Žukauskienė R The Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescent samples: Measurement invariance across 24 countries and regions, age, and gender. App Res Qual Life. 2022;17:2139–2161. 10.1007/s11482-021-10024-w PubMed DOI PMC
Joshanloo M. Latent state-trait modeling of Satisfaction with Life Scale: An item-level analysis using Dutch panel data. J Happiness Stud. 2022;23:3429–3440. 10.1007/s10902-022-00550-1 DOI
Schutte L, Negri L, Delle Fave A, Wissing MP. Rasch analysis of the Satisfaction with Life Scale across countries: Findings from South Africa and Italy. Current Psychol. 2021;40(4):4908–4917. 10.1007/s12144-019-00424-5 DOI
Wu C-H, Yao G. Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Pers Indiv Diff. 2006;40(6):1259–1268. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.012 DOI
Lolle HL, Andersen JG. Measuring happiness and overall life satisfaction: A Danish survey experiment on the impact of language and translation problems. J Happiness Stud. 2016;17:1337–1350. 10.1007/s10902-015-9646-4 DOI
Uchida Y, Ogihara Y, Fukushima S. Cultural construal of wellbeing–Theories and empirical evidence. In: Glatzer W, Camfield L, Møller V, Rojas M, editors. Global handbook of quality of life (pp. 823–837). Dordrecht: Springer; 2015. Pp. 823–837. 10.1007/978-94-017-9178-6_38 DOI
Joshanloo M, Jovanović V. The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: Analysis across demographic groups and global regions. Arch Women Mental Health. 2020;23(3):331–338. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-00998-w PubMed DOI
Lea C, MacLeod AK. Bringing life to mind: A qualitative and quantitative approach to identifying the information used in life satisfaction judgements. J Happiness Stud. 2019;20:1587–1608. 10.1007/s10902-018-0012-0 DOI
Brailovskaia J, Lin M, Scholten S, Zhu M, Fu Y, Shao M, Hu S, Li C, Guo W, Cai D, Lu S, Margraf J. A qualitative cross-cultural comparison of well-being constructs: The meaning of happiness, life satisfaction, and social support for German and Chinese students. J Happiness Stud. 2022;23:1379–1402. 10.1007/s10902-021-00454-6 DOI
Thomas LE, Chambers KO. Phenomenology of life satisfaction among elderly men: Quantitative and qualitative views. Psychol Aging; 1989;4:284–289. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.4.3.284 PubMed DOI
Hartung J, Spormann SS, Moshagen M, Wilhelm O. Structural differences in life satisfaction in a U.S. adult sample across age. J Pers. 2021;89(6):1232–1251. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12654 PubMed DOI
Joshanloo M. Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale in South Korea. Euro J Psychol Assess. 2023. Advance online publication. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000745 DOI
Jovanović V. Measurement invariance of the Serbian version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale across age, gender, and time. Euro J Psychol Assess. 2017;35(4):555–563. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000410 DOI
Chen X, Cai Z, He J, Fan X. Gender differences in life satisfaction among children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. J Happiness Stud. 2020;21(1):2279–2307. 10.1007/s10902-019-00169-9 DOI
Jovanović V, Joshanloo M. The contribution of positive and negative affect to life satisfaction across age. Appl Res Qual Life. 2022;17:511–524. 10.1007/s11482-020-09903-5 DOI
Abdallah S, Thompson S, Marks N. Estimating worldwide life satisfaction. Ecol Econ. 2008;65(1):35–47. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.009 DOI
Vemuri AW, Costanza R. The role of human, social, built, and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: Toward a National Well-Being Index (NWI). Ecol Econ. 2006;58(1):119–133. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.02.008 DOI
He J, van de Vijver F. Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings Psychol Cultur. 2012;2(2):8. 10.9707/2307-0919.1111 DOI
van Widenfelt BM, Treffers PDA, de Beurs E, Siebelink BM, Koudijs E. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2005;8(2):135–147. doi: 10.1007/s10567-005-4752-1 PubMed DOI
Swami V, Todd J, Barron D. Translation and validation of body image instruments: An addendum to Swami and Barron (2019) in the form of frequently asked questions. Body Im. 2021;37:214–224. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.002 PubMed DOI
Rogowska AM, Kuśnierz C, Ochnik D. Changes in stress, coping styles, and life satisfaction between the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal cross-lagged study in a sample of university students. J Clin Med. 2021;10(17):4025. doi: 10.3390/jcm10174025 PubMed DOI PMC
Ruggieri S, Ingoglia S, Bofanti RC, Lo Coco G. The role of online social comparison as a protective factor for psychological wellbeing: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 quarantine. Pers Ind Diff. 2021;171:110486. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110486 PubMed DOI PMC
Cowden RG, Rueger SY, Davis EB, Counted V, Kent BV, Chen Y, VanderWeele TJ, Rim M, Lemke AW, Worthington EL Jr. Resource loss, positive religious coping, and suffering during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective cohort study of US adults with chronic illness. Mental Health Religion Cultur. 2022;25(3):288–304. 10.1080/13674676.2021.1948000 DOI
Dymecka J, Gerymski R, Machnik-Czerwik A. How does stress affect life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic? Moderated mediation analysis of sense of coherence and fear of coronavirus. Psychol Health Med; 2022;27(1):280–288. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2021.1906436 PubMed DOI
Özer Ö, Özkan O, Özmen S, Ercoban N. Investigation of the effect of COVID-19 perceived risk on death anxiety, satisfaction with life, and psychological well-being. OMEGA. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/00302228211026169 PubMed DOI
Yıldırım M, Arslan G. A moderated mediation effect of stress-related growth and meaning in life in the association between coronavirus suffering and satisfaction with life: Development of the stress-related growth measure. Frontiers Psychol. 2021;12:648236. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648236 PubMed DOI PMC
Rogowska AM, Ochnik D, Kuśnierz C, Jakubiak M, Shütz A, Held MJ, Arzenšek A, Benatov J, Berger R, Korchagina EV, Pavlova I, Blažková I, Konečná Z, Cınar O, Cuero-Acosta YA. Satisfaction with life among university students from nine countries: Cross-national study during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Pub Health. 2021;21:2262. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12288-1 PubMed DOI PMC
Gori A, Topino E, Di Fabio A. The protective role of life satisfaction, coping strategies and defense mechanisms on perceived stress due to COVID-19 emergency: A chained mediation model. PloS ONE. 2021;15(11):e0242402. 10.1371/journal.pone.0242402 PubMed DOI PMC
Lopes AR, Nihei OK. Depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in Brazilian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Predictors and association with life satisfaction, psychological well-being and coping strategies. PloS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0258493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258493 PubMed DOI PMC
Gabel SG. The antidote to COVID-19: Policies and programs to enhance our well-being. J Human Rights Social Work. 2022;7:223–224. doi: 10.1007/s41134-022-00228-x PubMed DOI PMC
Diener E, Tay L. Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. Int J Psychol. 2015;50(2):135–149. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12136 PubMed DOI
Jovanović V, Joshanloo M, Đunda D, Bakhshi A. Gender differences in the relationship between domain-specific and general life satisfaction: A study in Iran and Serbia. App Res Qual Life; 2017;12(1):185–204. 10.1007/s11482-016-9461-z DOI
Diego-Rosell P, Tortora R, Bird J. International determinants of subjective well-being: Living in a subjectively material world. J Happiness Stud. 2018;19:123–143. 10.1007/s10902-016-9812-3 DOI
Ngamaba KH, Armitage C, Panagioti M, Hodkinson A. How closely related are financial satisfaction and subjective well-being? Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Exp Econ. 2020;85:101522. 10.1016/j.socec.2020.101522 DOI
Diener E, Diener M, Diener C. Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(5):851–864. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.851 PubMed DOI
Ng W, Diener E. Affluence and subjective well-being: Does income inequality moderate their associations?. App Res Qual Life; 2019;14(1):155–170. 10.1007/s11482-017-9585-9 DOI
Easterlin RA. Explaining happiness. PNAS. 2003;100:11176–11183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1633144100 PubMed DOI PMC
Diener E, Seligman MEP. Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychol Sci Pub Interest. 2004;5:1–31. doi: 10.1011/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001 PubMed DOI
Bai X, Wu C, Zheng R, Ren W. Psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale using a nationally representative sample of China. J Happiness Stud. 2011;12:183–197. 10.1007/s10902-010-9186-x DOI
Rajani NB, Skianis V, Filippidis FT. Association of environmental and sociodemographic factors with life satisfaction in 27 European countries. BMC Pub Health; 2019;19:534. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6886-y PubMed DOI PMC
Schucksmith M, Cameron S, Merridew T, Pichler F. Urban-rural differences in quality of life across the European Union. Reg Stud; 2009;43:1275–1289. 10.1080/00343400802378750 DOI
Sørensen JFL. Rural-urban differences in life satisfaction: Evidence from the European Union. Reg Stud; 2014;48:1451–1466. 10.1080/00343404.2012.753142 DOI
Morrison PS, Weckroth M. Human values, subjective well-being and the metropolitan region. Reg Stud; 2018;52:325–337. 10.1080/00343404.2017.1331036 DOI
Okulicz-Kozaryn A, Mazelis JM. Urbanism and happiness: A test of Wirth’s theory of urban life. Urban Stud; 2018;55:349–364. https://doi.org/10.1177.0042098016645470
Helliwell JF, Shiplett H, Barrington-Leigh CP. How happy are your neighbours? Variation in life satisfaction among 1200 Canadian neighbourhoods and communities. PloS One; 2019;14:e0210091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210091 PubMed DOI PMC
Barger SD, Donoho CJ, Wayment HA. The relative contributions of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, health, and social relationships to life satisfaction in the United States. Qual Life Res. 2009;18,:179–189. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9426-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Ebrahim A, Botha F, Snowball J. Determinants of life satisfaction among race groups in South Africa. Dev South Afr. 2013;30(2):168–185. 10.1080/0376835X.2013.797227 DOI
Tran K, Bennett A, Jackson A, Proctor H, Scollon CN. A meta-analytic review of Asian American life satisfaction. Asian Am J Psychol. 2023; Advance online publication. 10.1037/aap0000306 DOI
Park J, Joshanloo M, Scheifinger H. Predictors of life satisfaction in a large nationally representative Japanese sample. Soc Sci Res. 2019;82:45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.03.016 PubMed DOI
Swami V, Tran US, Stieger S, Voracek M. Developing a model linking self-reported nature exposure and positive body image: A study protocol for the Body Image in Nature Survey (BINS). Body Im. 2022;40:50–57. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.11.002 PubMed DOI
Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469–480. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 PubMed DOI
Erikson EH. Identity: Youth, and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton; 1968.
Brislin RW. The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner W, Berry J, editors. Field methods in cross-cultural research. London: Sage; 1986. Pp. 137–164.
Swami V, Kannan K, Furnham A. Positive body image: Inter-ethnic and rural-urban differences among an indigenous sample from Malaysian Borneo. Int J Soc Psy. 2012;58(6):568–576. doi: 10.1177/0020764011415208 PubMed DOI
Swami V, Tran US, Barron D, Afhami R, Aimé A, Almenara CA, Alp Dal N, Amaral ACS, Andrianto S, Anjum G, Argyrides M, Atari M, Aziz M, Banai B, Borowiec J, Brewis A, Cakir Kocak Y, Campos JADB, Carmona C, . . . Voracek M. (2020). The Breast Size Satisfaction Survey: Breast size dissatisfaction and its antecedents and outcomes in women from 40 countries. Body Im. 2020;32:199–217. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.01.006 PubMed DOI
Pedersen CB, Mortensen PB. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between urbanicity during upbringing and schizophrenia risk. Arch Gen Psy. 2001;58(11):1039–1046. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.11.1039 PubMed DOI
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. 10.1001/jama.2013.281053 PubMed DOI
Muthén LK, Muthén B. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 2022.
Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Struct Equat Model. 2014;21:495–508. 10.1080/10705511.2014.919210 DOI
Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Multiple group alignment for exploratory and structural equation models. Struct Equat Model. 2023. Advance online publication. 10.1080/10705511.2022.2127100 DOI
Byrne BM, Shavelson RJ, Muthén B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychol Bull. 1989;105(3):456–466. 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456 DOI
Pokropek A, Davidov E, Schmidt P. A Monte Carlo simulation study to assess the appropriateness of traditional and newer approaches to test for measurement invariance. Struct Equat Model. 2019;26(5):724–744. 10.1080/10705511.2018.1561293 DOI
McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Method. 1996;1(1):30–46. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30 DOI
McDonald RP. Test theory: A unified approach. London: Erlbaum; 1999.
van Assen MA, Stoevenbelt AH, van Aert RC. The end justifies the means: Questionable conversion of different effect sizes to a common effect size measure. Religion Brain Behav. 2023. Advance online publication. 10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070249 DOI
Shaw M, Rights JD, Sterba SS, Flake JK. r2mlm: An R package calculating R-squared measures for multilevel models. Behav Res Method. 2023;55:1942–1964. 10.3758/s13428-022-01841-4 PubMed DOI
Sass DA, Schmitt TA, Marsh HW. Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Struct Equat Model. 2014;21(2):167–180. 10.1080/10705511.2014.882658 DOI
Aiken LR. Formulas for equating ratings on different scales. Educ Psychol Measure. 1987;47(1):51–54. 10.1177/0013164487471007 DOI
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model. 1999;6(1):1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI
Rutkowski L, Svetina D. Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educ Psychol Measure. 2014;74:31–57. 10.1177/0013164413498257 DOI
Eid M, Diener E. Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: Inter- and intranational differences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(5):869–885. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.869 PubMed DOI
Marsh HW, Guo J, Parker PD, Nagengast B, Asparouhov T, Muthén B, Dicke T. What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups. Psychol Method. 2018;23(3):524–545. 10.1037/met0000113 PubMed DOI
Steinmetz H. Analyzing observed composite differences across multiple groups: Is partial measurement invariance enough? Methodology. 2013;9:1–12. 10.1027/1614-2241/a000049 DOI
Oishi S. The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. J Res Pers. 2006;40:411–423. 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.02.002 DOI
Arrindell W, Heesink J, Feij J. The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in The Netherlands. Pers Ind Diff. 1999;26(5):815–826. 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00180-9 DOI
Anderssen N, Sivertsen B, Lønning KJ, Malterud K. Life satisfaction and mental health among transgender students in Norway. BMC Pub Health. 2020;20:138. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8228-5 PubMed DOI PMC
Hendricks ML, Testa RJ. A conceptual framework for clinical work with transgender and gender nonconforming clients: An adaptation of the Minority Stress Model. Prof Psychol. 2012;43(5):460–467. 10.1037/a0029597 DOI
Checa I, Perales J, Espejo B. Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale by gender, age, marital status, and educational level. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(4):963–968. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2066-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Hinz A, Conrad I, Schroeter ML, Glaesmer H, Brähler E, Zenger M, Kocalevent R-D, Herzberg PY. Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), derived from a large German community sample. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1661–1670. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1844-1 PubMed DOI
Jebb AT, Morrison M, Tay L, Diener E. Subjective well-being around the world: Trends and predictors across the life span. Psychol Sci. 2020;31(3):293–305. doi: 10.1177/0956797619898826 PubMed DOI
Rollero C, Czepczor-Bernat K, Fedi A, Boza M, Brytek-Matera A, Lemoine JE, Sahlan RN, Wilson E, De Piccoli N, Gattino S. Life satisfaction in Europe and Iran: The role of self-esteem, gender identification and ambivalent sexism. Current Psychol. 2023. Advance online publication. 10.1007/s12144-022-03381-8 PubMed DOI PMC
Bartram D. Age and life satisfaction: Getting control variables under control. Sociol. 2022;55:421–437. 10.1177/003803852096871 DOI
Joshanloo M, Jovanović V. Similarities and differences in predictors of life satisfaction across age groups: A 150-country study. J Health Psychol. 2021;26:401–411. doi: 10.1177/1359105318819054 PubMed DOI
Tomás JM, Gutiérrez M, Sancho P, Romero I. Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) by gender and age in Angola. Pers Ind Diff. 2015;85:182–186. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.008 DOI
Gove WR, Hughes M, Briggs Style C. Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological well-being of the individual? J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:122–131. 10.2307/2136639 PubMed DOI
Ngoo YT, Tey NP, Tan EC. Determinants of life satisfaction in Asia. Soc Indic Res. 2015;124:141–156. https://doi.org/10.1007s11205-014-0772-x
Deci EL, Ryan EM. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2002.
Myers DG. The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. Am Psychol. 2000;55:56–67. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.56 PubMed DOI
Hamermesh DS. Life satisfaction, loneliness and togetherness, with an application to COVID-19 lock-downs. Rev Econ Household. 2020;18:983–1000. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09495-x PubMed DOI PMC
Barnes PW, Lightsey OR Jr. Perceived racism discrimination, coping, stress, and life satisfaction. J Multiracial Counsel Dev. 2005;33(1):48–61. 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2005.tb00004.x DOI
Oh S, Litam SDA. COVID-19 racial discrimination on mental health and life satisfaction among Asian Americans: Examining a moderated mediation model. Asian Am J Psychol. 2022;13(3):270–282. 10.1037/aap0000267 DOI
Prati G. The relationship between rural-urban place of residence and subjective well-being in nonlinear and its subjective significance is questionable. Int J Appl Posit Psychol. 2023. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10/1007/s41042-023-00117-2
Simons DJ, Shoda Y, Lindsay DS. Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Persp Psychol Sci. 2017;12(6):1123–1128. doi: 10.1177/174569161770863 PubMed DOI
Stieger S, Lewetz D, Swami V. Emotional well-being under conditions of lockdown: An experience sampling study in Austria during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Happiness Stud. 2021;22:2703–2720. doi: 10.1007/s10902-020-00337-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Applied Psychol; 2003;88:879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 PubMed DOI
Joshanloo M. The influence of fear of happiness beliefs on responses to the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Pers Ind Diff. 2013;54(5):647–651. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.011 DOI
Elliot M, Hayward RD. Religion and life satisfaction worldwide: The role of government regulation. Sociol Religion. 2009;70(3):285–310. 10.1093/socrel/srp028 DOI
Tay L, Li M, Myers D, Diener E. Religiosity and subjective well-being: An international perspective. In: Kim-Prieto C, editor. Religion and spirituality across cultures (Vol. 9). Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. pp. 163–175. 10.1007/978-94-017-8950-9_9 DOI
Nikolova M, Popova O. Sometimes your best just ain’t good enough: The worldwide evidence on subjective well-being efficiency. BE J Econ Analysis Policy. 2021;21(1):83–114. 10.1515/bejeap-2019-0396 DOI
Boiler L, Haverman M, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E. Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Pub Health. 2013;13:119. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-119 PubMed DOI PMC
Diener E, Inglehart R, Tay L. Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Soc Indic Res. 2013; 112:497–527. 10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y DOI