BACKGROUND: Ips cembrae is serious forest pest of European larch (Larix decidua). The negative impacts on nontarget invertebrates of the use of different I. cembrae trapping methods has not yet been evaluated, although mortality of nontarget invertebrates may occur. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2022, the impact of different I. cembrae trapping methods on nontarget invertebrates was assessed. Four trapping methods (slot traps, insecticide-treated tripods, logs and trees) baited with the pheromone lure Cembräwit were tested. Based on larval feeding habits, the captured nontarget invertebrates were grouped into four feeding types: predators, phloexylophagous, saproxylophagous and mycetophagous. The results indicate that predators, especially the clerid beetle Thanasimus formicarius, were the most negatively affected group of nontarget invertebrates. A negative effect on a number of IUCN Red List species also was shown, particularly on Corticeus fraxini (Tenebrionidae). The results show that Cembräwit-baited slot traps capture not only I. cembrae, but also other serious forest pests such as I. sexdentatus and Pityogenes chalcographus. The overall effect of different trapping methods on I. cembrae population densities has not been studied; however, our results indicate that the use of insecticide-treated methods has a negative effect on I. cembrae predators. CONCLUSION: The negative effect on the predators may be sufficiently large to outweigh any benefits gained from a reduction in I. cembrae numbers resulting from trapping. Therefore, in order to reduce the negative impacts on nontarget invertebrates, properly timed and consistent salvage logging should be used rather than insecticide-treated trapping methods. © 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management Mendel University in Brno Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology Brno Czech Republic

Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Department of Forest Protection and Entomology Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic

Forestry and Game Management Research Institute Jíloviště Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Bentz BJ, Régnière J, Fettig CJ, Hansen EM, Hayes JL, Hicke JA

Thom D, Seidl R, Steyrer G, Krehan H and Formayer H, Slow and fast drivers of the natural disturbance regime in central European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 307:293–302 (2013).

Marini L, Økland B, Jönsson A, Bentz B, Carroll A, Forster B

Marini L, Ayres M, Battisti A and Faccoli M, Climate affects severity and altitudinal distribution of outbreaks in an eruptive bark beetle. Clim Chang 115:327–341 (2012).

Biedermann PHW, Müller J, Grégoire J‐C, Gruppe A, Hagge J, Hammerbacher A PubMed

Seidl R, Schelhaas M‐J, Rammer W and Verkerk H, Corrigendum: increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. Nat Clim Chang 4:806–810 (2014). PubMed PMC

Hicke J, Meddens A and Kolden C, Recent tree mortality in the Western United States from bark Beetles and Forest fires. For Sci 62:141–153 (2016).

Hlásny T, Krokene P, Liebhold A, Montagné‐Huck C, Müller J, Qin H

Holmes T and Koch F, Bark beetle epidemics, life satisfaction, and economic well‐being. Forests 10:696 (2019).

Krehan H and Cech TL, Larch damage in upper Styria. An example of the complex effects of damage agents. Forstschutz Aktuell 32:4–8 (2004).

Grodzki W, The larch bark beetle

Špoula J and Kula E, Evaluating the effectiveness of installations for monitoring and control of

Špoula J and Kula E, Patterns of

Arač K and Pernek M, Occurrence and spreading of the large larch bark beetle (

Holuěa J, Kula E, Wewiora F and Resnerová K, Flight activity, within the trap tree abundance and overwintering of the larch bark beetle (

Resnerová K, Holuša J, Surový P, Trombik J and Kula E, Comparison of

Špoula J and Kula E, Poisoned trap trees: a positive or negative tool to control

Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Grégoire J‐C and Evans HF eds, Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht: (2004).

Stadelmann G, Bugmann H, Meier F, Wermelinger B and Bigler C, Effects of salvage logging and sanitation felling on bark beetle (

Pietzsch BW, Peter FJ and Berger U, The effect of sanitation felling on the spread of the European spruce bark beetle—an individual‐based modeling approach. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 4:704930 (2021). 10.3389/ffgc.2021.704930. DOI

Gomez DF, Riggins JJ, Cognato AI and Beetles B, in Forest Entomology and Pathology, Vol. 1, ed. by D. Allison J, Paine TD, Slippers B and Wingfield MJ. Entomology, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 299–337 (2023).

Thorn S, Bässler C, Brandl R, Burton PJ, Cahall R, Campbell JL PubMed PMC

Wermelinger B, Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle

Galko J, Nikolov C, Kunca A, Vakula J, Gubka A, Zúbrik M

Knížek M, Liška J and Véle A, Efficacy of synthetic lures for pine bark beetle monitoring. J For Sci 68:19–25 (2022).

Drumont A, González‐Ruiz R, Windt N, Grégoire J‐C, De Proft M and Seutin E, Semiochemicals and the integrated management of

Raty L, Drumont A, De Windt N and Grégoire J‐C, Mass trapping of the spruce bark beetle

Grodzki W, Do pheromone trapping always reflect

Sharifzadeh MS, Abdollahzadeh G, Damalas CA and Rezaei R, Farmers' criteria for pesticide selection and use in the Pest control process. Agri 8:24 (2018).

Hołyńska‐Iwan I and Szewczyk‐Golec K, Pyrethroids: how they affect human and animal health? Medicina 56:582 (2020). PubMed PMC

Bradberry SM, Cage SA, Proudfoot AT and Vale JA, Poisoning due to pyrethroids. Toxicol Rev 24:93–106 (2005). PubMed

Chrustek A, Hołyńska‐Iwan I, Dziembowska I, Bogusiewicz J, Wróblewski M, Cwynar A PubMed PMC

Soderlund D, Neurotoxicology of pyrethroid insecticides. Adv Neurotoxicol 4:113–165 (2019).

Aznar‐Alemany Ò and Eljarrat E, Introduction to Pyrethroid Insecticides: Chemical Structures, Properties, Mode of Action and Use, in Pyrethroid Insecticides, ed. by Eljarrat E. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 1–16 (2020).

Zhu Q, Yang Y, Zhong Y, Lao Z, O'Neill P, Hong D PubMed

Rivera‐Dávila OL, Sánchez‐Martínez G and Rico‐Martínez R, Ecotoxicity of pesticides and semiochemicals used for control and prevention of conifer bark beetle ( PubMed

Viiri H, Valkama H, Räty M and Niemelä P, Catches of

Martikainen P, Non‐target beetles (Coleoptera) in

Duduman M‐L and Olenici N, Non‐target bark Beetles in Ips duplicatus (Sahlberg) pheromone traps baited with host volatiles. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj‐Napoca 43:576–581 (2015).

Skrzecz I, Grodzki W, Kosibowicz M and Tumialis D, The alpha‐cypermethrin coated net for protecting Norway spruce wood against bark beetles (Curculionidae, Scolytinae). J Plant Protect Res 55:156–161 (2015).

Kula E, Šotola V, Špoula J and Wasserbauer J, Poisoned trap trees versus tripods with the Storanet net,

Seibold S, Brandl R, Buse J, Hothorn T, Schmidl J, Thorn S PubMed

Brooks M, Kristensen K, van Benthem K, Magnusson A, Berg C, Nielsen A

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B and Walker S, Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48 (2015).

Hothorn T, Bretz F and Westfall P, Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363 (2008). PubMed

Cáceres MD and Legendre P, Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90:3566–3574 (2009). PubMed

Schroeder LM, Differences in responses to α‐pinene and ethanol, and flight periods between the bark beetle predators

Bakke A and Kvamme T, Kairomone response inThanasimus predators to pheromone components of Ips typographus. J Chem Ecol 7:305–312 (1981). PubMed

Zühlke T and Mueller M, Method for Controlling Bark Beetle Populations by Controlling Bark Beetle Antagonists (WO2007006713A2) BASF Aktiengesellschaft.

Bohlmann J, Pine terpenoid defences in the mountain pine beetle epidemic and in other conifer pest interactions: specialized enemies are eating holes into a diverse, dynamic and durable defence system. Tree Physiol 32:943–945 (2012). PubMed

Johansson T, Olsson J, Hjältén J, Jonsson BG and Ericson L, Beetle attraction to sporocarps and wood infected with mycelia of decay fungi in old‐growth spruce forests of northern Sweden. For Ecol Manag 237:335–341 (2006).

Wegensteiner R, Wermelinger B and Herrmann M, Natural Enemies of Bark Beetles. Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp. 247–304 (2015).

Symonds MRE and Elgar MA, The mode of pheromone evolution: evidence from bark beetles. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 271:839–846 (2004). PubMed PMC

Marco‐Contelles J, The synthesis of Ipsenol and Ipsdienol: a review (1968‐2020). Chem Rec 21:858–878 (2021). PubMed

Francke W, Bartels J, Meyer H, Schröder F, Kohnle U, Baader E PubMed

Byers J, Birgersson G and Francke W, Aggregation pheromones of bark beetles, DOI

Kohnle U, Vité JP, Erbacher C, Bartels J and Francke W, Aggregation response of European engraver beetles of the genus

Schebeck M, Schopf A, Ragland GJ, Stauffer C and Biedermann PHW, Evolutionary ecology of the bark beetles PubMed

Goebel K, Andersen DE, Davros NM and Rice PJ, Effects of insecticide spray drift on arthropod prey resources of birds in grasslands in Minnesota. J Wildl Manag 88:e22572 (2024). 10.1002/jwmg.22572. DOI

Shang Q, Lu H, Yang M, Wu Y and Chen Q, The advancement and prospects of the tree trunk injection technique in the prevention and control of diseases and pests. Agri 14:107 (2024).

Antwi FB and Reddy GVP, Toxicological effects of pyrethroids on non‐target aquatic insects. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 40:915–923 (2015). PubMed

Farag MR, Alagawany M, Bilal RM, Gewida AGA, Dhama K, Abdel‐Latif HMR PubMed PMC

Wise J, Vanwoerkom A, Aćimović S, Sundin G, Cregg B and Vandervoort C, Trunk injection: a discriminating delivering system for horticulture crop IPM. Entomology, Ornithology & Herpetology 3:126 (2014).

Fettig CJ, Munson AS, Grosman DM and Bush PB, Evaluations of emamectin benzoate and propiconazole for protecting individual Pinus contorta from mortality attributed to colonization by PubMed

Fettig CJ, Munson AS, Grosman DM and Blackford DC, Evaluations of bole injections for protecting Engelmann spruce from mortality attributed to spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the intermountain west. J Entomol Sci 55:301–309 (2020).

Aksu Y,

Özcan G and Koçoğlu N, Evaluation of nutritional behavior and predation rate of

Schlup J, Investigations on the Population Dynamics of

Mills NJ and Schlup J, The Natural Enemies of Ips Typographus in Central Europe: Impact and Potential Use in Biological Control. Potential for Biological Control of Dendroctonus and Ips Bark Beetles. Austin State University, Nacogdoches: (1989).

Weslien J, Interactions within and between species at different densities of the bark beetle

Weslien J and Regnander J, The influence of natural enemies on brood production in

Hlásny T, König L, Krokene P, Lindner M, Montagné‐Huck C, Müller J

Kuhn A, Hautier L and San Martin G, Do pheromone traps help to reduce new attacks of PubMed PMC