The effectiveness of second- and-third-line biologics in perianal Crohn's disease-a multicenter propensity score-matched study
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
PubMed
40490896
DOI
10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf099
PII: 8159162
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Crohn’s, biologics, fistulas, perianal, second line, third line,
- MeSH
- biologické přípravky * terapeutické užití MeSH
- Crohnova nemoc * farmakoterapie diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- gastrointestinální látky * terapeutické užití MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití MeSH
- indukce remise MeSH
- inhibitory TNF terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie MeSH
- nemoci anu * farmakoterapie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- tendenční skóre MeSH
- ustekinumab * terapeutické užití MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- biologické přípravky * MeSH
- gastrointestinální látky * MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- inhibitory TNF MeSH
- ustekinumab * MeSH
- vedolizumab MeSH Prohlížeč
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (anti-TNFs) are the established treatment for perianal Crohn's disease (pCD), but relapse and non-response are common. Data on second- and third-line biologics are limited. We present the first direct comparison of second- and third-line biologics in pCD patients with active perianal disease previously treated with first-line anti-TNFs. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study included adult patients with pCD who failed first-line anti-TNF. The primary outcome was clinical perianal response, with secondary outcomes of radiological response (magnetic resonance imaging or transrectal ultrasound) and healing, and clinical remission. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences. RESULTS: A total of 486 pCD patients from 23 IBD centers were included, with 333/486 (68.5%) and 216/263 (82.1%) matched by PSM in the second and third-line treatment groups, respectively. In the second-line group, 62/78 (79.5%) of ustekinumab (UST)-treated patients achieved clinical perianal response, compared to 46/78 (58.9%) with vedolizumab (VDZ) (OR 4.47, 95% CI, 1.94-10.28, P < .001) and 38/78 (48.7%) with anti-TNFs (OR 5.29, 95% CI, 2.39-11.71, P < .001). In the third-line group, 38/49 (77.6%) of UST-treated patients achieved clinical perianal response, compared to 29/49 (59.2%) with VDZ (OR 9.96, 95% CI, 2.6-38.4, P < .001) and 27/49 (55.1%) with anti-TNFs (OR 12.03, 95% CI, 2.99-48.47, P < .001). UST-treated patients also had higher radiological response rates than VDZ (OR 3.28, 95% CI, 1.07-10.07, P = .038). CONCLUSION: In pCD patients failing anti-TNFs as first-line treatment, ustekinumab may be more effective than vedolizumab or another anti-TNF as second or third-line therapy.
Center for Gastroenterology Department of Internal Medicine University of Szeged Szeged Hungary
Clinical Pharmacology Unit São João University Hospital Center Porto Portugal
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Ghent University Hospital Ghent Belgium
Department of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition University Hospital Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
Department of Gastroenterology Hospital de Bellvitge L'Hospitalet Spain
Department of Gastroenterology Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Ramat Gan Israel
Department of Gastroenterology Venizeleio General Hospital Heraklion Greece
Department of Internal Medicine B Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Ramat Gan Israel
Digestive Diseases Centre Hospital AGEL Vitkovice Ostrava Czech Republic
Division of Gastroenterology Department of Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
Edinburgh IBD Unit Western General Hospital Edinburgh United Kingdom
Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital Pozzuoli Naples Italy
Gastroenterology Department Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela Santiago Spain
Gastroenterology Unit Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova Padua Italy
School of Medicine University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
Service de Gastrologie Entérologie Hépatologie CHU de Saint Etienne Saint Etienne France
University Hospital São João Porto Portugal
UOS Gastroenterologia Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola 00186 Rome Italy
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org