qDESH: a method to quantify disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
40597328
PubMed Central
PMC12219777
DOI
10.1186/s12987-025-00677-2
PII: 10.1186/s12987-025-00677-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Hydrocephalus * diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging * methods MeSH
- Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure * diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Subarachnoid Space * diagnostic imaging pathology MeSH
- Imaging, Three-Dimensional methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH) is a radiological biomarker for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). DESH is a subjective measure, based on visual assessments, which may limit its reliability. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a method for the objective quantification of DESH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By using a semiautomatic quantitative method, we calculated quantitative DESH (qDESH), defined as a ratio between CSF volumes at high convexities and Sylvian fissures. The analysis was based on three-dimensional T1-weighted images from 35 subjects with iNPH (mean age 74 yrs; 10 females) and 45 controls (mean age 72 yrs; 13 females). The interrater agreement for qDESH was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient, and qDESH was compared with visual assessments performed by two neuroradiologists. RESULTS: All subjects with iNPH and 13% of the controls visually scored DESH positive. The median qDESH was 2.48 (5th to 95th percentile 0.88 to 5.42) for iNPH and 0.63 (5th to 95th percentile 0.37 to 1.73) for the controls. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for qDESH was 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.90-1) in separating iNPH patients from controls. The interrater agreement for qDESH was 0.99 (95% CI 0.986-0.994, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Unlike visual DESH, qDESH generates a continuous variable, enabling reproducible quantification of DESH severity. With this method we can objectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic assessment of DESH in iNPH.
Department of Applied Physics and Electronics Umeå University Umeå Sweden
Department of Clinical Sciences Neurosciences Umeå University Umeå Sweden
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention Diagnostic Radiology Umeå University Umeå Sweden
Umeå Center for Functional Brain Imaging Umeå University Umeå Sweden
See more in PubMed
Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, Ojemann RG, Sweet WH. Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal-fluid pressure: a treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1965;273:117–26. PubMed
Kitagaki H, Mori E, Ishii K, Yamaji S, Hirono N, Imamura T. CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1277–84. PubMed PMC
Nakajima M, Yamada S, Miyajima M, Ishii K, Kuriyama N, Kazui H, et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (Third edition): endorsed by the Japanese society of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir. 2021;61:63–97. PubMed PMC
Kockum K, Lilja-Lund O, Larsson EM, Rosell M, Söderström L, Virhammar J, et al. The idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus Radscale: a radiological scale for structured evaluation. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25:569–76. PubMed
Agerskov S, Wallin M, Hellström P, Ziegelitz D, Wikkelsö C, Tullberg M, et al. Absence of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus, a sharp callosal angle, or other morphologic MRI markers should not be used to exclude patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus from shunt surgery. Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:74–9. PubMed PMC
Garcia-Armengol R, Domenech S, Botella-Campos C, Goncalves FJ, Menéndez B, Teixidor P, et al. Comparison of elevated intracranial pressure pulse amplitude and disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space (DESH) for prediction of surgical results in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir. 2016;158:2207–13. PubMed
Park HY, Park CR, Suh CH, Kim MJ, Shim WH, Kim SJ. Prognostic utility of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42:1429–36. PubMed PMC
Thavarajasingam SG, El-Khatib M, Vemulapalli K, Iradukunda HAS, Sajeenth Vishnu K, Borchert R, et al. Radiological predictors of shunt response in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir. 2023. PubMed PMC
Hong YJ, Kim MJ, Jeong E, Kim JE, Hwang J, Lee J, et al. Preoperative biomarkers in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus showing a favorable shunt surgery outcome. J Neurol Sci. 2018;387:21–6. PubMed
Virhammar J, Laurell K, Cesarini KG, Larsson EM. Preoperative prognostic value of MRI findings in 108 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:2311–8. PubMed PMC
Shinoda N, Hirai O, Hori S, Mikami K, Bando T, Shimo D, et al. Utility of MRI-based disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus scoring for predicting prognosis after surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: clinical research. J Neurosurg. 2017;127:1436–42. PubMed
Radovnický T, Adámek D, Derner M, Sameš M. Fractional anisotropy in patients with disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir. 2016;158:1495–500. PubMed
Jaraj D, Rabiei K, Marlow T, Jensen C, Skoog I, Wikkelsø C. Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology. 2014;82:1449–54. PubMed PMC
Ishii K, Soma T, Shimada K, Oda H, Terashima A, Kawasaki R. Automatic volumetry of the cerebrospinal fluid space in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2013;3:489–96. PubMed PMC
Benedetto N, Gambacciani C, Aquila F, Di Carlo DT, Morganti R, Perrini P. A new quantitative method to assess disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space (DESH) in patients with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: the SILVER index. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017;158:27–32. PubMed
Yamada S, Ito H, Matsumasa H, Tanikawa M, Ii S, Otani T, et al. Tightened sulci in the high convexities as a noteworthy feature of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg. 2023;176:e427–37. PubMed
Crook JE, Gunter JL, Ball CT, Jones DT, Graff-Radford J, Knopman DS, et al. Linear vs volume measures of ventricle size: relation to present and future gait and cognition. Neurology. 2020;94:e549–56. PubMed PMC
Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Yamamot K. Optimal diagnostic indices for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus based on the 3D quantitative volumetric analysis for the cerebral ventricle and subarachnoid space. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:2262–9. PubMed PMC
Malm J, Jacobsson J, Birgander R, Eklund A. Reference values for CSF outflow resistance and intracranial pressure in healthy elderly. Neurology. 2011;76:903–9. PubMed
Zarrinkoob L, Ambarki K, Wåhlin A, Birgander R, Eklund A, Malm J. Blood flow distribution in cerebral arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35:648–54. PubMed PMC
Ryska P, Slezak O, Eklund A, Malm J, Salzer J, Zizka J. Radiological markers of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: relative comparison of their diagnostic performance. J Neurol Sci. 2020;408:116581. PubMed
Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PML. INPH guidelines, part II: diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:4–16. PubMed
Friston KJ, Ashburner JT, Kiebel SJ, Nicholas TE, Penny WD. Statistical parametric Mappin: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images. 2007.
Ardekani BA, Kershaw J, Braun M, Kanno I. Automatic detection of the mid-sagittal plane in 3-D brain images. IEEE Trans Mes Imaging. 1997;16:947–52. PubMed
Ardekani BA, Bachman AH. Model-based automatic detection of the anterior and posterior commissures on MRI scans. Neuroimage. 2009;46:677–82. PubMed PMC
Ardekani B. A new approach to symmetric registration of longitudinal structural MRI of the human brain. bioRxiv. 2018. PubMed PMC
Axelsson J, Behndig S. qDESH GitHub. https://github.com/SofiaBehndig/qDESH
Narita W, Nishio Y, Baba T, Iizuka O, Ishihara T, Matsuda M, et al. High-convexity tightness predicts the shunt response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:1831–7. PubMed PMC
Sasaki M, Honda S, Yuasa T, Iwamura A, Shibata E, Ohba H. Narrow CSF space at high convexity and high midline areas in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus detected by axial and coronal MRI. Neuroradiology. 2008;50:117–22. PubMed
Alvarez Tolado N, Munakomi S, Prestigacomo CJ. Neuroanatomy, Sylvian Fissure. StatPearls. 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574552/ PubMed
Axelsson J. imlook4d. https://sites.google.com/site/imlook4d/
Huckman MS, Fox J, Topel J. The validity of criteria for the evaluation of cerebral atrophy by computed tomography. Radiology. 1975;116:85–92. PubMed
Gunasekera L, Richardson AE. Computerized axial tomography in idiopathic hydrocephalus. Brain. 1977;100:749–54. PubMed
Hashimoto M, Ishikawa M, Mori E, Kuwana N. Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2010;7:1–11. PubMed PMC
Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Yamamoto K. Comparison of CSF distribution between idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer disease. Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:1249–55. PubMed PMC
Ringstad G, Vatnehol SAS, Eide PK. Glymphatic MRI in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain. 2017;140:2691–705. PubMed PMC
Yamada S, Ito H, Matsumasa H, Ii S, Otani T, Tanikawa M, et al. Automatic assessment of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus from 3D MRI using two deep learning models. Front Aging Neurosci. 2024. PubMed PMC