Uptake of proteins and ampholytic solutes into polyelectrolyte brushes underlies some biological processes and also applications in sensing or biomedicine. Especially uptake on the "wrong" side of the isoelectric point (pI) remains puzzling, with charge regulation and solute patchiness proposed as possible mechanisms. Using a hierarchy of approximations, coarse-grained molecular simulations, self-consistent mean-field, and a simple phenomenological model, we investigated the uptake of model ampholytic solutes into polyanionic brushes across varying pH, salt concentrations, pKa values, and peptide sequences. In a narrow pH range on the wrong side of pI, charge regulation enables uptake of the ampholytes by inducing charge inversion so that they become positively charged in the brush despite being negatively charged in the bulk. This charge inversion can be calculated from the pH difference between the brush and the bulk, which is related to the Donnan potential. It is strongest for ampholytes with small differences between acidic and basic pKa values and decreases with increasing salt. Our phenomenological model reproduces the universal effect of charge regulation promoting ampholyte uptake into brushes but fails to be quantitative. The mean field model is close to explicit simulations for alternating sequences, but fails to describe the effect of charge patchiness, which is only captured by explicit simulations. Thus, our phenomenological framework offers a practical rule of thumb for estimating uptake from experimentally accessible parameters without sophisticated calculations. Deviations from this rule of thumb for complex ampholytes, such as proteins or peptides with patterned charge sequences, are captured only by explicit simulations.

Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry Faculty of Science Charles University Hlavova 8 128 40 Prague 2 Czech Republic

Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry University of Cambridge Lensfield Road Cambridge CB2 1EW United Kingdom

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ferrand-Drake del Castillo G., Hailes R. L. N., Adali-Kaya Z., Robson T., Dahlin A.. Generic high-capacity protein capture and release by ph control. Chem. Commun. 2020;56:5889–5892. doi: 10.1039/D0CC01250E. PubMed DOI

del Castillo G. F., Kyriakidou M., Adali Z., Xiong K., Hailes R. L. N., Dahlin A.. Electrically switchable polymer brushes for protein capture and release in biological environments. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:na. doi: 10.1002/anie.202115745. PubMed DOI PMC

Ferrand-Drake del Castillo G., Hailes R. L. N., Dahlin A.. Large changes in protonation of weak polyelectrolyte brushes with salt concentrationimplications for protein immobilization. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020;11:5212–5218. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01289. PubMed DOI PMC

Kim Y. C., Composto R. J., Winey K. I.. ph-mediated size-selective adsorption of gold nanoparticles on diblock copolymer brushes. ACS Nano. 2023;17:9224–9234. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c00212. PubMed DOI

Pilipenco A., Forinová M., Černochová Z., Kolská Z., Fekete L., Vaisocherová-Lísalová H., Houska M.. The effective charge of low-fouling polybetaine brushes. Langmuir. 2025;41:15307. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00759. PubMed DOI PMC

Ferrand-Drake del Castillo G., Koenig M., Müller M., Eichhorn K.-J., Stamm M., Uhlmann P., Dahlin A.. Enzyme immobilization in polyelectrolyte brushes: High loading and enhanced activity compared to monolayers. Langmuir. 2019;35:3479–3489. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00056. PubMed DOI

Marcelino T., Docampo M. A. R., Qian X., Ade C., Brodszkij E., Ceccato M., Foss M., Dulchavsky M., Bardwell J. C. A., Städler B.. Surfaces coated with polymer brushes work as carriers for histidine ammonia lyase. Macromol. Biosci. 2023;23:na. doi: 10.1002/mabi.202200528. PubMed DOI

Sorichetti V., Robin P., Palaia I., Hernandez-Armendariz A., Cuylen-Haering S., Šarić A.. Charge distribution of coating brush drives inter-chromosome attraction. PRX Life. 2025;3:033010. doi: 10.1103/41fd-r847. DOI

Hernandez-Armendariz A., Sorichetti V., Hayashi Y., Koskova Z., Brunner A., Ellenberg J., Šarić A., Cuylen-Haering S.. A liquid-like coat mediates chromosome clustering during mitotic exit. Mol. Cell. 2024;84:3254. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.07.022. PubMed DOI

Lund M., Jönsson B.. Charge regulation in biomolecular solution. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2013;46:265. doi: 10.1017/S003358351300005X. PubMed DOI

Avni Y., Andelman D., Podgornik R.. Charge regulation with fixed and mobile charged macromolecules. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. 2019;13:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.10.014. DOI

Pineda S. P., Staňo R., Murmiliuk A., Blanco P. M., Montes P., Tošner Z., Groborz O., Pánek J., Hrubý M., Štěp ánek M., Košovan P.. Charge regulation triggers condensation of short oligopeptides to polyelectrolytes. JACS Au. 2024;4:1775. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00668. PubMed DOI PMC

Ramezani Bajgiran S., Safi Samghabadi F., Li S., Conrad J. C., Marciel A. B.. Effects of the ionizable monomer fraction on the swelling behavior of weak polyelectrolyte brushes. Macromolecules. 2023;56:9218–9228. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00947. DOI

Safi Samghabadi F., Ramezani Bajgiran S., Villegas Orellana M., Conrad J. C., Marciel A. B.. Charge state of weak polyelectrolyte brushes determines salt-dependent swelling and hysteretic behavior. ACS Macro Lett. 2024;13:1570–1576. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.4c00585. PubMed DOI

Senechal V., Saadaoui H., Vargas-Alfredo N., Rodriguez-Hernandez J., Drummond C.. Weak polyelectrolyte brushes: re-entrant swelling and self-organization. Soft Matter. 2020;16:7727–7738. doi: 10.1039/D0SM00810A. PubMed DOI

Zhulina E. B., Birshtein T. M., Borisov O. V.. Theory of ionizable polymer brushes. Macromolecules. 1995;28:1491–1499. doi: 10.1021/ma00109a021. DOI

Zhulina E. B., Borisov O. V., Birshtein T. M.. Polyelectrolyte brush interaction with multivalent ions. Macromolecules. 1999;32:8189–8196. doi: 10.1021/ma981811e. DOI

Zhulina E. B., Klein Wolterink J., Borisov O. V.. Screening effects in a polyelectrolyte brush: Self-consistent-field theory. Macromolecules. 2000;33:4945–4953. doi: 10.1021/ma990187i. DOI

Zhulina E. B., Borisov O. V.. Poisson–boltzmann theory of ph-sensitive (annealing) polyelectrolyte brush. Langmuir. 2011;27:10615–10633. doi: 10.1021/la201456a. PubMed DOI

Zhulina E. B., Rubinstein M.. Ionic strength dependence of polyelectrolyte brush thickness. Soft Matter. 2012;8:9376. doi: 10.1039/c2sm25863c. PubMed DOI PMC

Ballauff M., Borisov O.. Polyelectrolyte brushes. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;11:316–323. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2006.12.002. DOI

Nap R., Gong P., Szleifer I.. Weak polyelectrolytes tethered to surfaces: Effect of geometry, acid–base equilibrium and electrical permittivity. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2006;44:2638–2662. doi: 10.1002/polb.20896. DOI

Geoghegan M.. Weak polyelectrolyte brushes. Soft Matter. 2022;18:2500–2511. doi: 10.1039/D2SM00005A. PubMed DOI

Nap R. J., Park S. H., Szleifer I.. Competitive calcium ion binding to end-tethered weak polyelectrolytes. Soft Matter. 2018;14:2365–2378. doi: 10.1039/C7SM02434G. PubMed DOI

Lunkad R., Murmiliuk A., Hebbeker P., Boublík M., Tošner Z., Štěpánek M., Košovan P.. Quantitative prediction of charge regulation in oligopeptides. Molecular Systems Design & Engineering. 2021;6:122–131. doi: 10.1039/D0ME00147C. DOI

Lunkad R., Murmiliuk A., Tošner Z., Štěpánek M., Košovan P.. Role of pK A in charge regulation and conformation of various peptide sequences. Polymers. 2021;13:214. doi: 10.3390/polym13020214. PubMed DOI PMC

Srivastava D., Santiso E., Gubbins K., Barroso da Silva F. L.. Computationally mapping pka shifts due to the presence of a polyelectrolyte chain around whey proteins. Langmuir. 2017;33:11417. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02271. PubMed DOI

Barroso da Silva F. L., MacKernan D.. Benchmarking a Fast Proton Titration Scheme in Implicit Solvent for Biomolecular Simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2017;13:2915. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01114. PubMed DOI

Henzler K., Haupt B., Lauterbach K., Wittemann A., Borisov O., Ballauff M.. Adsorption of β-actoglobulin on spherical polyelectrolyte brushes: Direct proof of counterion release by isothermal titration calorimetry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:3159. doi: 10.1021/ja909938c. PubMed DOI

Ran Q., Xu X., Dzubiella J., Haag R., Ballauff M.. Thermodynamics of the binding of lysozyme to a dendritic polyelectrolyte: Electrostatics versus hydration. ACS Omega. 2018;3:9086. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01493. PubMed DOI PMC

Kayitmazer A. B., Seeman D., Minsky B. B., Dubin P. L., Xu Y.. Protein–polyelectrolyte interactions. Soft Matter. 2013;9:2553. doi: 10.1039/c2sm27002a. DOI

Cooper C., Dubin P., Kayitmazer A., Turksen S.. Polyelectrolyte–protein complexes. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005;10:52. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2005.05.007. DOI

Wittemann A., Haupt B., Ballauff M.. Adsorption of proteins on spherical polyelectrolyte brushes in aqueous solution. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003;5:1671. doi: 10.1039/b300607g. PubMed DOI

Wittemann A., Ballauff M.. Interaction of proteins with linear polyelectrolytes and spherical polyelectrolyte brushes in aqueous solution. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006;8:5269. doi: 10.1039/b609879g. PubMed DOI

Barroso da Silva F. L., Lund M., Jonsson B., Akesson T.. On the complexation of proteins and polyelectrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:4459–4464. doi: 10.1021/jp054880l. PubMed DOI

Lunkad R., Barroso da Silva F. L., Košovan P.. Both charge-regulation and charge-patch distribution can drive adsorption on the wrong side of the isoelectric point. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:1813–1825. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c11676. PubMed DOI

Ulrich S., Laguecir A., Stoll S.. Complexation of a weak polyelectrolyte with a charged nanoparticle. solution properties and polyelectrolyte stiffness influences. Macromolecules. 2005;38:8939. doi: 10.1021/ma051142m. DOI

Ulrich S., Seijo M., Stoll S.. The many facets of polyelectrolytes and oppositely charged macroions complex formation. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;11:268. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2006.08.002. DOI

Carnal F., Stoll S.. Adsorption of weak polyelectrolytes on charged nanoparticles. impact of salt valency, ph, and nanoparticle charge density. monte carlo simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2011;115:12007. doi: 10.1021/jp205616e. PubMed DOI

Stornes M., Linse P., Dias R. S.. Monte carlo simulations of complexation between weak polyelectrolytes and a charged nanoparticle. influence of polyelectrolyte chain length and concentration. Macromolecules. 2017;50:5978. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00844. DOI

Blanco P. M., Achetoni M. M., Garcés J. L., Madurga S., Mas F., Baieli M. F., Narambuena C. F.. Adsorption of flexible proteins in the ’wrong side’ of the isoelectric point: casein macropeptide as a model system. Colloids Surf., B. 2022;217:112617. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112617. PubMed DOI

Yigit C., Heyda J., Dzubiella J.. Charged patchy particle models in explicit salt: Ion distributions, electrostatic potentials, and effective interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 2015;143:na. doi: 10.1063/1.4928077. PubMed DOI

Yigit C., Kanduč M., Ballauff M., Dzubiella J.. Interaction of charged patchy protein models with like-charged polyelectrolyte brushes. Langmuir. 2017;33:417. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03797. PubMed DOI

Radhakrishnan K., Beyer D., Holm C.. How charge regulation affects ph-responsive ampholyte uptake in weak polyelectrolyte brushes. Macromolecules. 2025;58:389–402. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.4c01838. DOI

van Male, J. Self-consistent-field theory for chain molecules: extensions, computational aspects, and applications. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, 2003.

Zhulina, E. B. ; Leermakers, F. A. M. ; Borisov, O. V. . Brushes of linear and dendritically branched polyelectrolytes. Polymer and Biopolymer Brushes; Wiley-Blackwell, 2017; Chapter 7, pp 223–241.

de Vos W. M., Leermakers F. A. M., de Keizer A., Cohen Stuart M. A., Kleijn J. M.. Field theoretical analysis of driving forces for the uptake of proteins by like-charged polyelectrolyte brushes: Effects of charge regulation and patchiness. Langmuir. 2010;26:249. doi: 10.1021/la902079u. PubMed DOI

Laktionov M. Y., Zhulina E. B., Borisov O. V.. Proteins and polyampholytes interacting with polyelectrolyte brushes and microgels: The charge reversal concept revised. Langmuir. 2021;37:2865–2873. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02837. PubMed DOI

Laktionov M. Y., Shavykin O. V., Leermakers F. A. M., Zhulina E. B., Borisov O. V.. Colloidal particles interacting with a polymer brush: a self-consistent field theory. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022;24:8463–8476. doi: 10.1039/D1CP04834A. PubMed DOI

Biesheuvel P. M., Wittemann A.. A Modified Box Model Including Charge Regulation for Protein Adsorption in a Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brush. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005;109:4209. doi: 10.1021/jp0452812. PubMed DOI

Salamatova T. O., Laktionov M. Y., Zhulina E. B., Borisov O. V.. Polyelectrolyte brush interacting with ampholytic nanoparticles as coarse-grained models of globular proteins: Poisson–boltzmann theory. Biomacromolecules. 2023;24:2433–2446. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01153. PubMed DOI

Salamatova T. O., Zhulina E. B., Borisov O. V.. Bovine serum albumin interaction with polyanionic and polycationic brushes: The case theoretical study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24:3395. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043395. PubMed DOI PMC

Longo G. S., Szleifer I.. Adsorption and protonation of peptides and proteins in pH responsive gels. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2016;49:323001. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/32/323001. DOI

Grest G. S., Kremer K.. Molecular dynamics simulation for polymers in the presence of a heat bath. Phys. Rev. A. 1986;33:3628. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.3628. PubMed DOI

Beyer D., Košovan P., Holm C.. Explaining giant apparent pK a shifts in weak polyelectrolyte brushes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023;131:168101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.168101. PubMed DOI

Landsgesell J., Hebbeker P., Rud O., Lunkad R., Košovan P., Holm C.. Grand-reaction method for simulations of ionization equilibria coupled to ion partitioning. Macromolecules. 2020;53:3007. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c00260. DOI

Klein Wolterink J., van Male J., Cohen Stuart M. A., Koopal L. K., Zhulina E. B., Borisov O. V.. Annealed star-branched polyelectrolytes in solution. Macromolecules. 2002;35:9176. doi: 10.1021/ma020781j. DOI

Uhlík F., Košovan P., Limpouchová Z., Procházka K., Borisov O. V., Leermakers F. A. M.. Modeling of ionization and conformations of starlike weak polyelectrolytes. Macromolecules. 2014;47:4004. doi: 10.1021/ma500377y. DOI

Murmiliuk A., Košovan P., Janata M., Procházka K., Uhlík F., Štěpánek M.. Local pH and effective pK of a polyelectrolyte chain: Two names for one quantity? ACS Macro Lett. 2018;7:1243–1247. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00484. PubMed DOI

Garcés J. L., Madurga S., Borkovec M.. Coupling of conformational and ionization equilibria in linear poly­(ethylenimine): a study based on the site binding/rotational isomeric state (SBRIS) model. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16:4626. doi: 10.1039/c3cp54211d. PubMed DOI

Popova T. O., Borisov O. V., Zhulina E. B.. Polyelectrolyte brushes with protein-like nanocolloids. Langmuir. 2024;40:1232–1246. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02556. PubMed DOI