STUDY OBJECTIVE: Assess the relationship between the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) pathway and routine care and 30-day postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: European centers (185 hospitals) across 21 countries. PATIENTS: A total of 2841 adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Each hospital had a 1-month recruitment period between October 2019 and September 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Routine perioperative care. MEASUREMENTS: Twenty-four components of the ERAS pathway were assessed in all patients regardless of whether they were treated in a formal ERAS pathway. A multivariable and multilevel logistic regression model was used to adjust for baseline risk factors, ERAS elements and country-based differences. RESULTS: A total of 1835 patients (65%) received perioperative care at a self-declared ERAS center, 474 (16.7%) developed moderate-to-severe postoperative complications, and 63 patients died (2.2%). There was no difference in the primary outcome between patients who were or were not treated in self-declared ERAS centers (17.1% vs. 16%; OR 1.00; 95%CI, 0.79-1.27; P = 0.986). Hospital stay was shorter among patients treated in self-declared ERAS centers (6 [5-9] vs. 8 [6-10] days; OR 0.82; 95%CI, 0.78-0.87; P < 0.001). Median adherence to 24 ERAS elements was 57% [48%-65%]. Adherence to ERAS-pathway quartiles (≥65% vs. <48%) suggested that patients with the highest adherence rates experienced a lower risk of moderate-to-severe complications (15.9% vs. 17.8%; OR 0.71; 95%CI, 0.53-0.96; P = 0.027), lower risk of death (0.3% vs. 2.9%; OR 0.10; 95%CI, 0.02-0.42; P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (6 [4-8] vs. 7 [5-10] days; OR 0.74; 95%CI, 0.69-0.79; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment in a self-declared ERAS center does not improve outcome after colorectal surgery. Increased adherence to the ERAS pathway is associated with a significant reduction in overall postoperative complications, lower risk of moderate-to-severe complications, shorter length of hospital stay and lower 30-day mortality.

• MeSH
• délka pobytu MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• elektivní chirurgické výkony škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• kolorektální chirurgie * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• perioperační péče metody   MeSH
• pooperační komplikace epidemiologie   etiologie   MeSH
• pozorovací studie jako téma MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• urychlená pooperační rehabilitace * MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY To evaluate hand function deficiency in patients with Dupuytren's disease (DD) in addition to assessing the improvement of function after palmar fasciectomy by using different hand-related questionnaires. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 121 hands (95 patients) underwent surgery. Disease severity was designated using Tubiana's Staging System. The Tendency of changes of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH), Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM), and Hand Function Score (HFS) scores of patients with DD undergoing palmar fasciectomy were assessed prior to, 3 months after, and 1 year after the operation. Moreover, total loss of extension (TLoE) was evaluated using a goniometer in the same time intervals. Repeated measure ANOVA Friedman's test were used. Responsiveness to clinical change was calculated by using standardized response means (SRMs). RESULTS The results showed statistically significant improvement of the originally obtained questionnaire results after 3 months for DASH and HFS and 12 months for all forms; only the PEM and DASH score significantly changed between 3 and 12 months. TLoE before surgery was 144.1 o ±99.6 o ; 3-month and 1-year after surgery: 14.3 o ±58.0 o and 19.3 o ±34.7 o respectively. SRMs for 1 year after surgery was large for PEM (1.11) and medium for DASH (0.7) and HFS (0.79). CONCLUSIONS DASH, PEM, and HFS are valuable tools to monitor the hand function of patients with DD after surgery. Key words:hand function, Dupuytren's disease, palmar fasciectomy.

• MeSH
• Dupuytrenova kontraktura rehabilitace   chirurgie   MeSH
• fasciotomie metody   rehabilitace   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• obnova funkce MeSH
• posuzování pracovní neschopnosti MeSH
• průzkumy zdravotní péče MeSH
• ruka chirurgie   MeSH
• ukazatele zdravotního stavu MeSH
• získané deformity ruky rehabilitace   chirurgie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) have been promoted to optimize antimicrobial usage and patient outcomes, and to reduce the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. However, the best strategies for an ASP are not definitively established and are likely to vary based on local culture, policy, and routine clinical practice, and probably limited resources in middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to evaluate structures and resources of antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) in surgical departments from different regions of the world. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in 2016 on 173 physicians who participated in the AGORA (Antimicrobials: A Global Alliance for Optimizing their Rational Use in Intra-Abdominal Infections) project and on 658 international experts in the fields of ASPs, infection control, and infections in surgery. RESULTS: The response rate was 19.4%. One hundred fifty-six (98.7%) participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary AST. The median number of physicians working inside the team was five [interquartile range 4-6]. An infectious disease specialist, a microbiologist and an infection control specialist were, respectively, present in 80.1, 76.3, and 67.9% of the ASTs. A surgeon was a component in 59.0% of cases and was significantly more likely to be present in university hospitals (89.5%, p < 0.05) compared to community teaching (83.3%) and community hospitals (66.7%). Protocols for pre-operative prophylaxis and for antimicrobial treatment of surgical infections were respectively implemented in 96.2 and 82.3% of the hospitals. The majority of the surgical departments implemented both persuasive and restrictive interventions (72.8%). The most common types of interventions in surgical departments were dissemination of educational materials (62.5%), expert approval (61.0%), audit and feedback (55.1%), educational outreach (53.7%), and compulsory order forms (51.5%). CONCLUSION: The survey showed a heterogeneous organization of ASPs worldwide, demonstrating the necessity of a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach in the battle against antimicrobial resistance in surgical infections, and the importance of educational efforts towards this goal.

• MeSH
• antibiotická politika metody   MeSH
• antiinfekční látky terapeutické užití   MeSH
• celosvětové zdraví trendy   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nitrobřišní infekce farmakoterapie   MeSH
• pooperační komplikace farmakoterapie   MeSH
• průřezové studie MeSH
• průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH