Monitoring is a major component of asthma management in children. Regular monitoring allows for diagnosis confirmation, treatment optimization, and natural history review. Numerous factors that may affect disease activity and patient well-being need to be monitored: response and adherence to treatment, disease control, disease progression, comorbidities, quality of life, medication side-effects, allergen and irritant exposures, diet and more. However, the prioritization of such factors and the selection of relevant assessment tools is an unmet need. Furthermore, rapidly developing technologies promise new opportunities for closer, or even "real-time," monitoring between visits. Following an approach that included needs assessment, evidence appraisal, and Delphi consensus, the PeARL Think Tank, in collaboration with major international professional and patient organizations, has developed a set of 24 recommendations on pediatric asthma monitoring, to support healthcare professionals in decision-making and care pathway design.
- MeSH
- antiastmatika terapeutické užití MeSH
- bronchiální astma * diagnóza terapie MeSH
- delfská metoda MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monitorování fyziologických funkcí metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
AIMS: To evaluate access to screening tools for monogenic diabetes in paediatric diabetes centres across the world and its impact on diagnosis and clinical outcomes of children and youth with genetic forms of diabetes. METHODS: 79 centres from the SWEET diabetes registry including 53,207 children with diabetes participated in a survey on accessibility and use of diabetes related antibodies, c-peptide and genetic testing. RESULTS: 73, 63 and 62 participating centres had access to c-peptide, antibody and genetic testing, respectively. Access to antibody testing was associated with higher proportion of patients with rare forms of diabetes identified with monogenic diabetes (54 % versus 17 %, p = 0.01), lower average whole clinic HbA1c (7.7[Q1,Q2: 7.3-8.0]%/61[56-64]mmol/mol versus 9.2[8.6-10.0]%/77[70-86]mmol/mol, p < 0.001) and younger age at onset (8.3 [7.3-8.8] versus 9.7 [8.6-12.7] years p < 0.001). Additional access to c-peptide or genetic testing was not related to differences in age at onset or HbA1c outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical suspicion and antibody testing are related to identification of different types of diabetes. Implementing access to comprehensive antibody screening may provide important information for selecting individuals for further genetic evaluation. In addition, worse overall clinical outcomes in centers with limited diagnostic capabilities indicate they may also need support for individualized diabetes management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04427189.
- MeSH
- C-peptid MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 1. typu * diagnóza genetika MeSH
- diabetes mellitus * diagnóza MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- glykovaný hemoglobin analýza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- plošný screening MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinická studie MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
