Cardiogenic shock is a state of reduced cardiac output leading to hypotension, pulmonary congestion, and hypoperfusion of tissues and vital organs. Despite the advances in intensive care over the last years, the morbidity and mortality of patients remain high. The available studies of patients with cardiogenic shock suggest a connection between clinical variables, the level of biomarkers, the results of imaging investigations, strategies of management and the outcome of this group of patients. The management of patients with cardiogenic shock initially complicating acute myocardial infarction is challenging, and the number of studies in this area is growing fast. The purpose of this review is to summarize the currently available evidence on cardiogenic shock initially complicating acute myocardial infarction with particular attention to predictors of prognosis, focusing on laboratory variables (established and new), and to discuss the practical implementation. Currently available scoring systems developed during the past few decades predict the clinical outcome of this group of patients using some of the established biomarkers among other variables. With the new laboratory biomarkers that have shown their predictive value in cardiogenic shock outcomes, a new design of scoring systems would be of interest. Identifying high-risk patients offers the opportunity for early decision-making.

• Klíčová slova
• acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, laboratory biomarkers, outcomes,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• přehledy MeSH

Levosimendan is an inodilator that promotes cardiac contractility primarily through calcium sensitization of cardiac troponin C and vasodilatation via opening of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels in vascular smooth muscle cells; the drug also exerts organ-protective effects through a similar effect on mitochondrial KATP channels. This pharmacological profile identifies levosimendan as a drug that may have applications in a wide range of critical illness situations encountered in intensive care unit medicine: hemodynamic support in cardiogenic or septic shock; weaning from mechanical ventilation or from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; and in the context of cardiorenal syndrome. This review, authored by experts from 9 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Czech republic, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, and Switzerland), examines the clinical and experimental data for levosimendan in these situations and concludes that, in most instances, the evidence is encouraging, which is not the case with other cardioactive and vasoactive drugs routinely used in the intensive care unit. The size of the available studies is, however, limited and the data are in need of verification in larger controlled trials. Some proposals are offered for the aims and designs of these additional studies.

• MeSH
• jednotky intenzivní péče * MeSH
• kardiogenní šok diagnóza   farmakoterapie   mortalita   patofyziologie   MeSH
• kardiorenální syndrom diagnóza   farmakoterapie   mortalita   patofyziologie   MeSH
• kardiotonika škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• obnova funkce MeSH
• péče o pacienty v kritickém stavu MeSH
• rizikové faktory MeSH
• septický šok diagnóza   farmakoterapie   mortalita   patofyziologie   MeSH
• simendan škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• vazodilatancia škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• zvířata MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• zvířata MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• přehledy MeSH
• Názvy látek
• kardiotonika MeSH
• simendan MeSH
• vazodilatancia MeSH

OBJECTIVE: Catecholamines have been the mainstay of pharmacological treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS). Recently, use of epinephrine has been associated with detrimental outcomes. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the association between epinephrine use and short-term mortality in all-cause CS patients. DESIGN: We performed a meta-analysis of individual data with prespecified inclusion criteria: (1) patients in non-surgical CS treated with inotropes and/or vasopressors and (2) at least 15% of patients treated with epinephrine administrated alone or in association with other inotropes/vasopressors. The primary outcome was short-term mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Fourteen published cohorts and two unpublished data sets were included. We studied 2583 patients. Across all cohorts of patients, the incidence of epinephrine use was 37% (17-76%) and short-term mortality rate was 49% (21-69%). A positive correlation was found between percentages of epinephrine use and short-term mortality in the CS cohort. The risk of death was higher in epinephrine-treated CS patients (OR [CI] = 3.3 [2.8-3.9]) compared to patients treated with other drug regimens. Adjusted mortality risk remained striking in epinephrine-treated patients (n = 1227) (adjusted OR = 4.7 [3.4-6.4]). After propensity score matching, two sets of 338 matched patients were identified and epinephrine use remained associated with a strong detrimental impact on short-term mortality (OR = 4.2 [3.0-6.0]). CONCLUSIONS: In this very large cohort, epinephrine use for hemodynamic management of CS patients is associated with a threefold increase of risk of death.

• Klíčová slova
• Cardiogenic shock, Epinephrine, Meta-analysis, Prognosis,
• MeSH
• adrenalin * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• kardiogenní šok farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• koronární angioplastika MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• tendenční skóre MeSH
• vazokonstriktory * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• metaanalýza MeSH
• Názvy látek
• adrenalin * MeSH
• vazokonstriktory * MeSH

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used increasingly for both respiratory and cardiac failure in adult patients. Indications for ECMO use in cardiac failure include severe refractory cardiogenic shock, refractory ventricular arrhythmia, active cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest, and acute or decompensated right heart failure. Evidence is emerging to guide the use of this therapy for some of these indications, but there remains a need for additional evidence to guide best practices. As a result, the use of ECMO may vary widely across centers. The purpose of this document is to highlight key aspects of care delivery, with the goal of codifying the current use of this rapidly growing technology. A major challenge in this field is the need to emergently deploy ECMO for cardiac failure, often with limited time to assess the appropriateness of patients for the intervention. For this reason, we advocate for a multidisciplinary team of experts to guide institutional use of this therapy and the care of patients receiving it. Rigorous patient selection and careful attention to potential complications are key factors in optimizing patient outcomes. Seamless patient transport and clearly defined pathways for transition of care to centers capable of providing heart replacement therapies (e.g., durable ventricular assist device or heart transplantation) are essential to providing the highest level of care for those patients stabilized by ECMO but unable to be weaned from the device. Ultimately, concentration of the most complex care at high-volume centers with advanced cardiac capabilities may be a way to significantly improve the care of this patient population.

• Klíčová slova
• Cardiac arrest, Cardiac failure, Critical care networks, Extracorporeal life support, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Hospital organization, Mechanical circulatory support, Position article,
• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• kardiogenní šok * MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mimotělní membránová oxygenace * MeSH
• podpůrné srdeční systémy MeSH
• srdeční selhání * terapie   MeSH
• transplantace srdce MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND: The clinical CardShock risk score, including baseline lactate levels, was recently shown to facilitate risk stratification in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). As based on baseline parameters, however, it may not reflect the change in mortality risk in response to initial therapies. Adrenomedullin is a prognostic biomarker in several cardiovascular diseases and was recently shown to associate with hemodynamic instability in patients with septic shock. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic value and association with hemodynamic parameters of bioactive adrenomedullin (bio-ADM) in patients with CS. METHODS: CardShock was a prospective, observational, European multinational cohort study of CS. In this sub-analysis, serial plasma bio-ADM and arterial blood lactate measurements were collected from 178 patients during the first 10 days after detection of CS. RESULTS: Both bio-ADM and lactate were higher in 90-day non-survivors compared to survivors at all time points (P < 0.05 for all). Lactate showed good prognostic value during the initial 24 h (AUC 0.78 at admission and 0.76 at 24 h). Subsequently, lactate returned normal (≤2 mmol/L) in most patients regardless of later outcome with lower prognostic value. By contrast, bio-ADM showed increasing prognostic value from 48 h and beyond (AUC 0.71 at 48 h and 0.80 at 5-10 days). Serial measurements of either bio-ADM or lactate were independent of and provided added value to CardShock risk score (P < 0.001 for both). Ninety-day mortality was more than double higher in patients with high levels of bio-ADM (>55.7 pg/mL) at 48 h compared to those with low bio-ADM levels (49.1 vs. 22.6%, P = 0.001). High levels of bio-ADM were associated with impaired cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure during the study period. Furthermore, high levels of bio-ADM at 48 to 96 h were related to persistently impaired cardiac and end-organ function. CONCLUSIONS: Bio-ADM is a valuable prognosticator and marker of impaired hemodynamics in CS patients. High levels of bio-ADM may show shock refractoriness and developing end-organ dysfunction and thus help to guide therapeutic approach in patients with CS. Study identifier of CardShock study NCT01374867 at clinicaltrials.gov.

• Klíčová slova
• Adrenomedullin, Biomarkers, Cardiogenic shock, Hemodynamics, Lactate, Mortality,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND: Vasopressors and inotropes remain a cornerstone in stabilization of the severely impaired hemodynamics and cardiac output in cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim of this study was to analyze current real-life use of these medications, and their impact on outcome and on changes in cardiac and renal biomarkers over time in CS. METHODS: The multinational CardShock study prospectively enrolled 219 patients with CS. The use of vasopressors and inotropes was analyzed in relation to the primary outcome, i.e., 90-day mortality, with propensity score methods in 216 patients with follow-up data available. Changes in cardiac and renal biomarkers over time until 96 hours from baseline were analyzed with linear mixed modeling. RESULTS: Patients were 67 (SD 12) years old, 26 % were women, and 28 % had been resuscitated from cardiac arrest prior to inclusion. On average, systolic blood pressure was 78 (14) and mean arterial pressure 57 (11) mmHg at detection of shock. 90-day mortality was 41 %. Vasopressors and/or inotropes were administered to 94 % of patients and initiated principally within the first 24 hours. Noradrenaline and adrenaline were given to 75 % and 21 % of patients, and 30 % received several vasopressors. In multivariable logistic regression, only adrenaline (21 %) was independently associated with increased 90-day mortality (OR 5.2, 95 % CI 1.88, 14.7, p = 0.002). The result was independent of prior cardiac arrest (39 % of patients treated with adrenaline), and the association remained in propensity-score-adjusted analysis among vasopressor-treated patients (OR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.3, 7.2, p = 0.013); this was further confirmed by propensity-score-matched analysis. Adrenaline was also associated, independent of prior cardiac arrest, with marked worsening of cardiac and renal biomarkers during the first days. Dobutamine and levosimendan were the most commonly used inotropes (49 % and 24 %). There were no differences in mortality, whether noradrenaline was combined with dobutamine or levosimendan. CONCLUSION: Among vasopressors and inotropes, adrenaline was independently associated with 90-day mortality in CS. Moreover, adrenaline use was associated with marked worsening in cardiac and renal biomarkers. The combined use of noradrenaline with either dobutamine or levosimendan appeared prognostically similar.

• Klíčová slova
• Adrenaline, Cardiogenic shock, Inotropes, Mortality, Propensity score, Survival, Vasoactive medication, Vasopressors,
• MeSH
• adrenalin škodlivé účinky   farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• hemodynamika fyziologie   MeSH
• kardiogenní šok komplikace   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• kardiotonika farmakokinetika   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mortalita v nemocnicích MeSH
• přežití tkáně účinky léků   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• tendenční skóre MeSH
• vazokonstriktory škodlivé účinky   farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• adrenalin MeSH
• kardiotonika MeSH
• vazokonstriktory MeSH

BACKGROUND: Soluble ST2 (sST2) is an interleukin-33 receptor. sST2 was found to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with myocardial infarction, sepsis and heart failure. OBJECTIVES: To assess sST2 levels in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and septic shock (SS), and to evaluate the prognostic value of sST2 for short-term mortality. METHODS: The present prospective observational study evaluated 32 patients with CS, 17 patients with SS and 61 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI )(control group). Samples of serum were collected eight times and the follow-up time was three months. RESULTS: sST2 levels were elevated from admission in SS patients relative to patients with CS and STEMI, who exhibited peak sST2 levels 24 h after admission. On admission, CS patients had a median (5th percentile; 95th percentile) sST2 level of 62.5 pg/mL (8.3 pg/mL; 315.8 pg/mL) and SS patients had a median sST2 level of 216.4 pg/mL (46.8 pg/mL; 364.4 pg/mL). ROC analysis found sST2 to be a biomarker that could distinguish between CS and SS at admission (area under the curve [AUC] 0.813; P<0.01) with a cut-off value of 210.4 pg/mL. Patients with STEMI had significantly lower sST2 levels at admission (20.3 pg/mL (4.2 pg/mL; 339.8 pg/mL) compared with CS patients. The AUC of the ROC analysis was 0.671 (P=0.007) for the detection of CS in patients with STEMI. Only a weak correlation was observed between sST2 and B-type natriuretic peptide (r=0.376, P=0.05) and sST2 and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (r=0.496, P=0.019). No statistically significant differences were observed in sST2 levels in patients with CS and SS relative to three-month mortality. CONCLUSION: Levels of sST2 at admission are significantly higher in patients with SS compared with CS. sST2 could be a diagnostic marker to distinguish SS and CS as well as CS and STEMI at the time of admission. Levels of sST2 are related to levels of natriuretic peptides in CS but not in SS. sST2 levels are not a suitable prognostic marker for patients with CS and SS.

• Klíčová slova
• Cardiogenic shock, Circulating levels, ST2, Septic shock,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH