-
Something wrong with this record ?
Nová a zlepšená kardiopulmonální resuscitace
[Improved patient survival using a modified resuscitation protocol for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest]
Alex G. Garza, et al.
Language Czech Country Czech Republic
Document type Comparative Study
- MeSH
- American Heart Association MeSH
- Survival Analysis MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Brain Damage, Chronic etiology prevention & control MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Electric Countershock contraindications methods standards MeSH
- Ventricular Fibrillation epidemiology complications MeSH
- Insufflation MeSH
- Intubation, Intratracheal methods standards MeSH
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation methods standards MeSH
- Clinical Protocols MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Heart Massage MeSH
- Oxygen Inhalation Therapy contraindications methods mortality MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Practice Guidelines as Topic MeSH
- Heart Arrest complications mortality therapy MeSH
- Emergency Medical Services methods standards MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Kansas MeSH
- United States MeSH
Cardiac arrest continues to have poor survival in the United States. Recent studies have questioned current practice in resuscitation. Our emergency medical services system made significant changes to the adult cardiac arrest resuscitation protocol, including minimizing chest compression interruptions, increasing the ratio of compressions to ventilation, deemphasizing or delaying intubation, and advocating chest compressions before initial countershock. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective observational cohort study reviewed all adult primary ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrests 36 months before and 12 months after the protocol change. Primary outcome was survival to discharge; secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation and cerebral performance category. Survival of out-of-hospital arrest of presumed primary cardiac origin improved from 7.5% (82 of 1097) in the historical cohort to 13.9% (47 of 339) in the revised protocol cohort (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 2.70). Similar increases in return of spontaneous circulation were achieved for the subset of witnessed cardiac arrest patients with initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation from 37.8% (54 of 143) to 59.6% (34 of 57) (odds ratio, 2.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.24 to 4.80). Survival to hospital discharge also improved from an unadjusted survival rate of 22.4% (32 of 143) to 43.9% (25 of 57) (odds ratio, 2.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.34 to 1.59) with the protocol. Of the 25 survivors, 88% (n=22) had favorable cerebral performance categories on discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The changes to our prehospital protocol for adult cardiac arrest that optimized chest compressions and reduced disruptions increased the return of spontaneous circulation and survival to discharge in our patient population. These changes should be further evaluated for improving survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Improved patient survival using a modified resuscitation protocol for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc09002369
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210152438.0
- 008
- 091105s2009 xr e cze||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Garza, Alex G.
- 245 10
- $a Nová a zlepšená kardiopulmonální resuscitace / $c Alex G. Garza, et al.
- 246 11
- $a Improved patient survival using a modified resuscitation protocol for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
- 314 __
- $a Washington Hospital Center, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington. alexgarza@cox.net
- 520 9_
- $a Cardiac arrest continues to have poor survival in the United States. Recent studies have questioned current practice in resuscitation. Our emergency medical services system made significant changes to the adult cardiac arrest resuscitation protocol, including minimizing chest compression interruptions, increasing the ratio of compressions to ventilation, deemphasizing or delaying intubation, and advocating chest compressions before initial countershock. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective observational cohort study reviewed all adult primary ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrests 36 months before and 12 months after the protocol change. Primary outcome was survival to discharge; secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation and cerebral performance category. Survival of out-of-hospital arrest of presumed primary cardiac origin improved from 7.5% (82 of 1097) in the historical cohort to 13.9% (47 of 339) in the revised protocol cohort (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 2.70). Similar increases in return of spontaneous circulation were achieved for the subset of witnessed cardiac arrest patients with initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation from 37.8% (54 of 143) to 59.6% (34 of 57) (odds ratio, 2.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.24 to 4.80). Survival to hospital discharge also improved from an unadjusted survival rate of 22.4% (32 of 143) to 43.9% (25 of 57) (odds ratio, 2.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.34 to 1.59) with the protocol. Of the 25 survivors, 88% (n=22) had favorable cerebral performance categories on discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The changes to our prehospital protocol for adult cardiac arrest that optimized chest compressions and reduced disruptions increased the return of spontaneous circulation and survival to discharge in our patient population. These changes should be further evaluated for improving survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a Americká kardiologická asociace $7 D000572
- 650 _2
- $a kardiopulmonální resuscitace $x metody $x normy $7 D016887
- 650 _2
- $a chronické poškození mozku $x etiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D001925
- 650 _2
- $a klinické protokoly $7 D002985
- 650 _2
- $a elektrická defibrilace $x kontraindikace $x metody $x normy $7 D004554
- 650 _2
- $a urgentní zdravotnické služby $x metody $x normy $7 D004632
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a masáž srdce $7 D006336
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a insuflace $7 D007327
- 650 _2
- $a intratracheální intubace $x metody $x normy $7 D007442
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $7 D017410
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a analýza přežití $7 D016019
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a fibrilace komor $x epidemiologie $x komplikace $7 D014693
- 650 _2
- $a srdeční zástava $x komplikace $x mortalita $x terapie $7 D006323
- 650 _2
- $a oxygenoterapie $x kontraindikace $x metody $x mortalita $7 D010102
- 651 _2
- $a Kansas $x epidemiologie $7 D007615
- 651 _2
- $a Spojené státy americké $7 D014481
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012706 $t Clinical cardiology alert $g Roč. 3, č. 5 (2009), s. 40-41 $x 1213-2586
- 787 18
- $w bmc09002370 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku Nová a zlepšená kardiopulmonální resuscitace]
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2242 $c 407 a $y 9
- 990 __
- $a 20091105110109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20091201103540 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 691540 $s 553439
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2009 $b 3 $c 5 $d 40-41 $i 1213-2586 $m Clinical Cardiology Alert $x MED00012706
- LZP __
- $a 2009-34/mkme