Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Does interspecies hybridization affect the host specificity of parasites in cyprinid fish?

A. Simková, M. Dávidová, I. Papoušek, L. Vetešník,

. 2013 ; 6 () : 95.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Host specificity varies among parasite species. Some parasites are strictly host-specific, others show a specificity for congeneric or non-congeneric phylogenetically related host species, whilst some others are non-specific (generalists). Two cyprinids, Cyprinus carpio and Carassius gibelio, plus their respective hybrids were investigated for metazoan parasites. The aim of this study was to analyze whether interspecies hybridization affects host specificity. The different degrees of host specificity within a phylogenetic framework were taken into consideration (i.e. strict specialist, intermediate specialist, and intermediate generalist). METHODS: Fish were collected during harvesting the pond and identified using meristic traits and molecular markers. Metazoan parasite species were collected. Host specificity of parasites was determined using the following classification: strict specialist, intermediate specialist, intermediate generalist and generalist. Parasite species richness was compared between parental species and their hybrids. The effect of host species on abundance of parasites differing in host specificity was tested. RESULTS: Hybrids harbored more different parasite species but their total parasite abundance was lower in comparison with parental species. Interspecies hybridization affected the host specificity of ecto- and endoparasites. Parasite species exhibiting different degrees of host specificity for C. carpio and C. gibelio were also present in hybrids. The abundance of strict specialists of C. carpio was significantly higher in parental species than in hybrids. Intermediate generalists parasitizing C. carpio and C. gibelio as two phylogenetically closely related host species preferentially infected C. gibelio when compared to C. carpio, based on prevalence and maximum intensity of infection. Hybrids were less infected by intermediate generalists when compared to C. gibelio. CONCLUSIONS: This finding does not support strict co-adaptation between host and parasite genotypes resulting in narrow host specificity, and showed that hybrid genotypes are susceptible to parasites exhibiting host specificity. The immune mechanisms specific to parental species might represent potential mechanisms explaining the low abundance of parasites in C. gibelio x C. carpio hybrids.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13031488
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20131008113951.0
007      
ta
008      
131002s2013 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/1756-3305-6-95 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23587287
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Simková, Andrea $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic. simkova@sci.muni.cz
245    10
$a Does interspecies hybridization affect the host specificity of parasites in cyprinid fish? / $c A. Simková, M. Dávidová, I. Papoušek, L. Vetešník,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Host specificity varies among parasite species. Some parasites are strictly host-specific, others show a specificity for congeneric or non-congeneric phylogenetically related host species, whilst some others are non-specific (generalists). Two cyprinids, Cyprinus carpio and Carassius gibelio, plus their respective hybrids were investigated for metazoan parasites. The aim of this study was to analyze whether interspecies hybridization affects host specificity. The different degrees of host specificity within a phylogenetic framework were taken into consideration (i.e. strict specialist, intermediate specialist, and intermediate generalist). METHODS: Fish were collected during harvesting the pond and identified using meristic traits and molecular markers. Metazoan parasite species were collected. Host specificity of parasites was determined using the following classification: strict specialist, intermediate specialist, intermediate generalist and generalist. Parasite species richness was compared between parental species and their hybrids. The effect of host species on abundance of parasites differing in host specificity was tested. RESULTS: Hybrids harbored more different parasite species but their total parasite abundance was lower in comparison with parental species. Interspecies hybridization affected the host specificity of ecto- and endoparasites. Parasite species exhibiting different degrees of host specificity for C. carpio and C. gibelio were also present in hybrids. The abundance of strict specialists of C. carpio was significantly higher in parental species than in hybrids. Intermediate generalists parasitizing C. carpio and C. gibelio as two phylogenetically closely related host species preferentially infected C. gibelio when compared to C. carpio, based on prevalence and maximum intensity of infection. Hybrids were less infected by intermediate generalists when compared to C. gibelio. CONCLUSIONS: This finding does not support strict co-adaptation between host and parasite genotypes resulting in narrow host specificity, and showed that hybrid genotypes are susceptible to parasites exhibiting host specificity. The immune mechanisms specific to parental species might represent potential mechanisms explaining the low abundance of parasites in C. gibelio x C. carpio hybrids.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a Cyprinidae $x imunologie $x parazitologie $7 D003530
650    12
$a přenos genů horizontální $7 D022761
650    _2
$a genotyp $7 D005838
650    12
$a hostitelská specificita $7 D058507
650    _2
$a paraziti $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D010271
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Dávidová, Martina $u -
700    1_
$a Papoušek, Ivo $u -
700    1_
$a Vetešník, Lukáš $u -
773    0_
$w MED00165371 $t Parasites & vectors $x 1756-3305 $g Roč. 6(2013), s. 95
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23587287 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20131002 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20131008114513 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 995575 $s 829933
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 6 $d 95 $i 1756-3305 $m Parasites & vectors $n Parasit Vectors $x MED00165371
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20131002

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...