Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of glucose variability assessed by a continuous glucose-monitoring system in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus switched from NPH insulin to insulin glargine: the COBIN2 study

DJ. Zdarska, M. Kvapil, Z. Rusavy, M. Krcma, J. Broz, B. Krivska, P. Kadlecova,

. 2014 ; 126 (7-8) : 228-37.

Language English Country Austria

Document type Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Glucose variability combined with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) assessments more reliably represents the level of glycemic control. The study was aimed to compare blood glucose variability with insulin glargine vs. neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using a continuous glucose-monitoring system (CGMS), in patients treated with basal insulin using stable dose of oral antidiabetic agents and HbA1c in the range of 4.5-8.0 % International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) units. [6.2-9.4 % Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) units]. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-arm study in patients (N = 116) treated for ≥ 2 months with NPH and metformin combined with sulfonylurea or glinide. Glucose variability was measured after a 4-week NPH treatment phase and after a subsequent 12-week glargine treatment phase using CGMS. Based on 72-hour CGMS, glucose variability was assessed by area under the curve [AUC (mmol/L · h)]. Differences (glargine-NPH) in AUC within 24 h in the glucose ranges of ≤ 3.3, ≤ 3.9, 7.5-3.9 (margins excluding), ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 mmol/L were evaluated. Circadian fluctuation of glucose was assessed by M-value (log-transformation of the deviation from an arbitrary standard). RESULTS: AUCs of glucose in the lowest ranges (≤ 3.3 and ≤ 3.9 mmol/L) did not change significantly after treatment with glargine. Those in the higher ranges (≥ 7.5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 mmol/L) were significantly lower (p < 0.001 for all ranges), whereas AUC of glucose in the normal range (3.9-7.5 mmol/L) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) at the end of glargine treatment phase. Circadian fluctuation of glucose assessed by M-value showed a significant decrease after glargine treatment (p < 0.003). No significant differences in hypoglycemia confirmed by glucose value ≤ 3.3 mmol/L were found between treatment phases. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00659477. CONCLUSIONS: As monitored by CGMS, switching from NPH to glargine with active titration shifted glucose from abnormally high to normal levels with reduced fluctuation and without increased risk of hypoglycemia.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15023565
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150723093729.0
007      
ta
008      
150709s2014 au f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00508-014-0508-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24563017
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a au
100    1_
$a Zdarska, Denisa Janickova $u Medical Department, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, denisa.janickova.zdarska@email.cz.
245    10
$a Comparison of glucose variability assessed by a continuous glucose-monitoring system in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus switched from NPH insulin to insulin glargine: the COBIN2 study / $c DJ. Zdarska, M. Kvapil, Z. Rusavy, M. Krcma, J. Broz, B. Krivska, P. Kadlecova,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Glucose variability combined with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) assessments more reliably represents the level of glycemic control. The study was aimed to compare blood glucose variability with insulin glargine vs. neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using a continuous glucose-monitoring system (CGMS), in patients treated with basal insulin using stable dose of oral antidiabetic agents and HbA1c in the range of 4.5-8.0 % International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) units. [6.2-9.4 % Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) units]. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-arm study in patients (N = 116) treated for ≥ 2 months with NPH and metformin combined with sulfonylurea or glinide. Glucose variability was measured after a 4-week NPH treatment phase and after a subsequent 12-week glargine treatment phase using CGMS. Based on 72-hour CGMS, glucose variability was assessed by area under the curve [AUC (mmol/L · h)]. Differences (glargine-NPH) in AUC within 24 h in the glucose ranges of ≤ 3.3, ≤ 3.9, 7.5-3.9 (margins excluding), ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 mmol/L were evaluated. Circadian fluctuation of glucose was assessed by M-value (log-transformation of the deviation from an arbitrary standard). RESULTS: AUCs of glucose in the lowest ranges (≤ 3.3 and ≤ 3.9 mmol/L) did not change significantly after treatment with glargine. Those in the higher ranges (≥ 7.5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 mmol/L) were significantly lower (p < 0.001 for all ranges), whereas AUC of glucose in the normal range (3.9-7.5 mmol/L) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) at the end of glargine treatment phase. Circadian fluctuation of glucose assessed by M-value showed a significant decrease after glargine treatment (p < 0.003). No significant differences in hypoglycemia confirmed by glucose value ≤ 3.3 mmol/L were found between treatment phases. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00659477. CONCLUSIONS: As monitored by CGMS, switching from NPH to glargine with active titration shifted glucose from abnormally high to normal levels with reduced fluctuation and without increased risk of hypoglycemia.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a krevní glukóza $x analýza $7 D001786
650    _2
$a diabetes mellitus 2. typu $x krev $x diagnóza $x farmakoterapie $7 D003924
650    _2
$a monitorování léčiv $x metody $7 D016903
650    _2
$a náhrada léků $7 D057915
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hypoglykemika $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D007004
650    _2
$a NPH inzulin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D007336
650    _2
$a dlouhodobě působící inzulin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D049528
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $7 D018848
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kvapil, Milan
700    1_
$a Rusavy, Zdenek
700    1_
$a Krcma, Michal
700    1_
$a Broz, Jan
700    1_
$a Krivska, Bohumila
700    1_
$a Kadlecova, Pavla
773    0_
$w MED00010762 $t Wiener klinische Wochenschrift $x 1613-7671 $g Roč. 126, č. 7-8 (2014), s. 228-37
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24563017 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150723093807 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1083902 $s 906558
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 126 $c 7-8 $d 228-37 $i 1613-7671 $m Wiener klinische Wochenschrift $n Wien Klin Wochenschr $x MED00010762
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150709

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...