-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Detection of pathogenic clostridia in biogas plant wastes
J. Neuhaus, AA. Shehata, M. Krüger,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- biopaliva mikrobiologie MeSH
- Clostridium klasifikace genetika růst a vývoj izolace a purifikace MeSH
- odpadní produkty analýza MeSH
- rostliny mikrobiologie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
As the number of biogas plants has grown rapidly in the last decade, the amount of potentially contaminated wastes with pathogenic Clostridium spp. has increased as well. This study reports the results from examining 203 biogas plant wastes (BGWs). The following Clostridium spp. with different frequencies could be isolated via a new enrichment medium (Krüne medium) and detected by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS): Clostridium perfringens (58 %) then Clostridium bifermentans (27 %), Clostridium tertium (23 %) and Clostridium butyricum (19 %), Clostridium cadaveris (15 %), Clostridium parapurificum (6 %), Clostridium glycolicum (5 %), Clostridium baratii (4 %), Clostridium sporogenes (2 %), Clostridium sordellii (1 %) and Clostridium subterminale (0.5 %). The mean most probable number (MPN) count of sulfite reducing bacteria was between 10(3) and 10(4)/mL, and the higher the MPN, the more pathogenic Clostridium spp. were present. Also, real-time PCR was used to be compared with culture method for C. perfringens, C. bifermentans, C. butyricum, C. sporogenes/Clostridium botulinum and C. sordellii. Although real-time PCR was more sensitive than the culture method, both systems improve the recovery rate but in different ways and are useful to determine pathogenic clostridia in biogas plants. In conclusion, BGWs could present a biohazard risk of clostridia for humans and animals.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15024796
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150722103518.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150721s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s12223-014-0334-2 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24984829
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Neuhaus, Jürgen $u Institute of Bacteriology and Mycology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig University, An den Tierkliniken 29, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Detection of pathogenic clostridia in biogas plant wastes / $c J. Neuhaus, AA. Shehata, M. Krüger,
- 520 9_
- $a As the number of biogas plants has grown rapidly in the last decade, the amount of potentially contaminated wastes with pathogenic Clostridium spp. has increased as well. This study reports the results from examining 203 biogas plant wastes (BGWs). The following Clostridium spp. with different frequencies could be isolated via a new enrichment medium (Krüne medium) and detected by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS): Clostridium perfringens (58 %) then Clostridium bifermentans (27 %), Clostridium tertium (23 %) and Clostridium butyricum (19 %), Clostridium cadaveris (15 %), Clostridium parapurificum (6 %), Clostridium glycolicum (5 %), Clostridium baratii (4 %), Clostridium sporogenes (2 %), Clostridium sordellii (1 %) and Clostridium subterminale (0.5 %). The mean most probable number (MPN) count of sulfite reducing bacteria was between 10(3) and 10(4)/mL, and the higher the MPN, the more pathogenic Clostridium spp. were present. Also, real-time PCR was used to be compared with culture method for C. perfringens, C. bifermentans, C. butyricum, C. sporogenes/Clostridium botulinum and C. sordellii. Although real-time PCR was more sensitive than the culture method, both systems improve the recovery rate but in different ways and are useful to determine pathogenic clostridia in biogas plants. In conclusion, BGWs could present a biohazard risk of clostridia for humans and animals.
- 650 _2
- $a biopaliva $x mikrobiologie $7 D056804
- 650 _2
- $a Clostridium $x klasifikace $x genetika $x růst a vývoj $x izolace a purifikace $7 D003013
- 650 _2
- $a rostliny $x mikrobiologie $7 D010944
- 650 _2
- $a odpadní produkty $x analýza $7 D014866
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Shehata, Awad A
- 700 1_
- $a Krüger, Monika
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 60, č. 1 (2015), s. 15-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24984829 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b online $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150721 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150722103555 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1085053 $s 907797
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 60 $c 1 $d 15-9 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150721