Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Electrophysiology and colour: a comparison of methods to evaluate inner retinal function

A. Kurtenbach, C. Kernstock, E. Zrenner, H. Langrová,

. 2015 ; 131 (3) : 159-67. [pub] 20150923

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago

PURPOSE: Several methods are routinely used in the clinic to diagnose and monitor diseases of inner retinal function. In this study, we compare four such methods in patients with diabetes and glaucoma, to determine correlations between their results and to determine which method is most sensitive for detecting disease. METHODS: Twenty control subjects, 12 patients with early glaucoma and eight patients with diabetes mellitus, were enrolled in the study. All underwent four examinations: transient pattern electroretinogram (PERG), multifocal pattern electroretinogram (mfPERG), chromatic contrast threshold measurements (protan and tritan), and blue-on-yellow short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). RESULTS: For the total cohort of 40 subjects, the results show a significant correlation between the amplitudes of the PERG and those of the mfPERG, as well as between the tritan contrast thresholds and the SWAP MD. Furthermore, ROC analyses reveal that colour contrast thresholds could significantly distinguish between the patient and the control group. Glaucoma patients alone could also be distinguished. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the methods compared in this study show correlations between their results if they are testing same pathway or underling cells, and that the colour contrast threshold is the most sensitive method to detect early functional deficits in diabetic and glaucoma patients.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16009953
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160413101548.0
007      
ta
008      
160408s2015 ne f 000 0|engg|
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10633-015-9512-z $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10633-015-9512-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26399726
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Kurtenbach, A $u Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Schleichstrasse 12-16, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. anne.kurtenbach@uni-tuebingen.de.
245    10
$a Electrophysiology and colour: a comparison of methods to evaluate inner retinal function / $c A. Kurtenbach, C. Kernstock, E. Zrenner, H. Langrová,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Several methods are routinely used in the clinic to diagnose and monitor diseases of inner retinal function. In this study, we compare four such methods in patients with diabetes and glaucoma, to determine correlations between their results and to determine which method is most sensitive for detecting disease. METHODS: Twenty control subjects, 12 patients with early glaucoma and eight patients with diabetes mellitus, were enrolled in the study. All underwent four examinations: transient pattern electroretinogram (PERG), multifocal pattern electroretinogram (mfPERG), chromatic contrast threshold measurements (protan and tritan), and blue-on-yellow short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). RESULTS: For the total cohort of 40 subjects, the results show a significant correlation between the amplitudes of the PERG and those of the mfPERG, as well as between the tritan contrast thresholds and the SWAP MD. Furthermore, ROC analyses reveal that colour contrast thresholds could significantly distinguish between the patient and the control group. Glaucoma patients alone could also be distinguished. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the methods compared in this study show correlations between their results if they are testing same pathway or underling cells, and that the colour contrast threshold is the most sensitive method to detect early functional deficits in diabetic and glaucoma patients.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a poruchy barevného vidění $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D003117
650    _2
$a citlivost na kontrast $x fyziologie $7 D015350
650    _2
$a diabetes mellitus 1. typu $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D003922
650    _2
$a diabetická retinopatie $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D003930
650    _2
$a elektrofyziologické jevy $7 D055724
650    _2
$a elektrofyziologie $x metody $7 D004594
650    _2
$a elektroretinografie $x metody $7 D004596
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a glaukom $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D005901
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a ROC křivka $7 D012372
650    _2
$a čípky retiny $x fyziologie $7 D017949
650    _2
$a senzorické prahy $7 D012684
650    _2
$a testy zrakového pole $7 D058609
650    _2
$a zraková pole $x fyziologie $7 D014794
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kernstock, C $u Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Schleichstrasse 12-16, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Zrenner, E $u Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Schleichstrasse 12-16, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience (CIN), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Langrová, H $u University Eye Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00010453 $t Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology $x 1573-2622 $g Roč. 131, č. 3 (2015), s. 159-67
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26399726 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160413101632 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1113382 $s 934321
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 131 $c 3 $d 159-67 $e 20150923 $i 1573-2622 $m Documenta ophthalmologica $n Doc Ophthalmol $x MED00010453
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160408

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...