-
Something wrong with this record ?
Electrophysiology and colour: a comparison of methods to evaluate inner retinal function
A. Kurtenbach, C. Kernstock, E. Zrenner, H. Langrová,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells physiology MeSH
- Contrast Sensitivity physiology MeSH
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 diagnosis physiopathology MeSH
- Diabetic Retinopathy diagnosis physiopathology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Electrophysiological Phenomena MeSH
- Electrophysiology methods MeSH
- Electroretinography methods MeSH
- Glaucoma diagnosis physiopathology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Color Vision Defects diagnosis physiopathology MeSH
- ROC Curve MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensory Thresholds MeSH
- Visual Field Tests MeSH
- Visual Fields physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
PURPOSE: Several methods are routinely used in the clinic to diagnose and monitor diseases of inner retinal function. In this study, we compare four such methods in patients with diabetes and glaucoma, to determine correlations between their results and to determine which method is most sensitive for detecting disease. METHODS: Twenty control subjects, 12 patients with early glaucoma and eight patients with diabetes mellitus, were enrolled in the study. All underwent four examinations: transient pattern electroretinogram (PERG), multifocal pattern electroretinogram (mfPERG), chromatic contrast threshold measurements (protan and tritan), and blue-on-yellow short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). RESULTS: For the total cohort of 40 subjects, the results show a significant correlation between the amplitudes of the PERG and those of the mfPERG, as well as between the tritan contrast thresholds and the SWAP MD. Furthermore, ROC analyses reveal that colour contrast thresholds could significantly distinguish between the patient and the control group. Glaucoma patients alone could also be distinguished. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the methods compared in this study show correlations between their results if they are testing same pathway or underling cells, and that the colour contrast threshold is the most sensitive method to detect early functional deficits in diabetic and glaucoma patients.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16009953
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160413101548.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160408s2015 ne f 000 0|engg|
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10633-015-9512-z $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10633-015-9512-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26399726
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Kurtenbach, A $u Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Schleichstrasse 12-16, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. anne.kurtenbach@uni-tuebingen.de.
- 245 10
- $a Electrophysiology and colour: a comparison of methods to evaluate inner retinal function / $c A. Kurtenbach, C. Kernstock, E. Zrenner, H. Langrová,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: Several methods are routinely used in the clinic to diagnose and monitor diseases of inner retinal function. In this study, we compare four such methods in patients with diabetes and glaucoma, to determine correlations between their results and to determine which method is most sensitive for detecting disease. METHODS: Twenty control subjects, 12 patients with early glaucoma and eight patients with diabetes mellitus, were enrolled in the study. All underwent four examinations: transient pattern electroretinogram (PERG), multifocal pattern electroretinogram (mfPERG), chromatic contrast threshold measurements (protan and tritan), and blue-on-yellow short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). RESULTS: For the total cohort of 40 subjects, the results show a significant correlation between the amplitudes of the PERG and those of the mfPERG, as well as between the tritan contrast thresholds and the SWAP MD. Furthermore, ROC analyses reveal that colour contrast thresholds could significantly distinguish between the patient and the control group. Glaucoma patients alone could also be distinguished. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the methods compared in this study show correlations between their results if they are testing same pathway or underling cells, and that the colour contrast threshold is the most sensitive method to detect early functional deficits in diabetic and glaucoma patients.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a poruchy barevného vidění $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D003117
- 650 _2
- $a citlivost na kontrast $x fyziologie $7 D015350
- 650 _2
- $a diabetes mellitus 1. typu $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D003922
- 650 _2
- $a diabetická retinopatie $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D003930
- 650 _2
- $a elektrofyziologické jevy $7 D055724
- 650 _2
- $a elektrofyziologie $x metody $7 D004594
- 650 _2
- $a elektroretinografie $x metody $7 D004596
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a glaukom $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D005901
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a ROC křivka $7 D012372
- 650 _2
- $a čípky retiny $x fyziologie $7 D017949
- 650 _2
- $a senzorické prahy $7 D012684
- 650 _2
- $a testy zrakového pole $7 D058609
- 650 _2
- $a zraková pole $x fyziologie $7 D014794
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kernstock, C $u Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Schleichstrasse 12-16, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Zrenner, E $u Centre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Schleichstrasse 12-16, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience (CIN), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Langrová, H $u University Eye Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010453 $t Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology $x 1573-2622 $g Roč. 131, č. 3 (2015), s. 159-67
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26399726 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160413101632 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1113382 $s 934321
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 131 $c 3 $d 159-67 $e 20150923 $i 1573-2622 $m Documenta ophthalmologica $n Doc Ophthalmol $x MED00010453
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160408