Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Procidentia in pregnancy: a systematic review and recommendations for practice

Z. Rusavy, L. Bombieri, RM. Freeman,

. 2015 ; 26 (8) : 1103-9. [pub] 20150120

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2010-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in pregnancy is a rare condition with decreasing incidence and improved management and outcome world-wide recently. Systematic review of the literature for cases of POP in pregnancy published since 1990 was carried out to identify common factors in presentation, management and outcomes. One case from our own practice was added to the analysis. METHODS: An extensive search of the Pubmed/Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was performed to identify all cases of POP in pregnancy since 1990. Published case reports of POP in pregnancy were reviewed and summarized in tables to find similarities in history, course, management and outcome of the pregnancies. RESULTS: Of the 43 cases and one case series, 41 case studies were eligible for analysis. Two types of POP in pregnancy were identified: preexisting is less common (14 vs 27 cases), often resolves during pregnancy (5 out of 14) and always recurs after delivery (14 out of 14); acute onset of POP in pregnancy rarely resolves in pregnancy (2 out of 27), but often resolves after delivery (18 out of 27). Most patients were managed with bed rest (20 out of 41), pessary (15 out of 41), manual reduction (6 out of 41) and local treatment (6 out of 41). The most common complications reported include preterm labour (14 out of 41), cervical ulcerations (9 out of 41), infection (3 out of 41) and obstructed labour (4 out of 41). About a half of the women delivered vaginally (22 out of 41), caesarean section due to prolapse was required in 15 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct entities were identified based on similarities regarding onset, course and outcome of POP in pregnancy. Concise recommendations for practice were derived from the analysis of case studies published since 1990.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16020996
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160728105602.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00192-014-2595-3 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00192-014-2595-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25600351
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Rusavy, Zdenek $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Alej Svobody 80, Pilsen, 30460, Czech Republic, rusavyz@fnplzen.cz.
245    10
$a Procidentia in pregnancy: a systematic review and recommendations for practice / $c Z. Rusavy, L. Bombieri, RM. Freeman,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in pregnancy is a rare condition with decreasing incidence and improved management and outcome world-wide recently. Systematic review of the literature for cases of POP in pregnancy published since 1990 was carried out to identify common factors in presentation, management and outcomes. One case from our own practice was added to the analysis. METHODS: An extensive search of the Pubmed/Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was performed to identify all cases of POP in pregnancy since 1990. Published case reports of POP in pregnancy were reviewed and summarized in tables to find similarities in history, course, management and outcome of the pregnancies. RESULTS: Of the 43 cases and one case series, 41 case studies were eligible for analysis. Two types of POP in pregnancy were identified: preexisting is less common (14 vs 27 cases), often resolves during pregnancy (5 out of 14) and always recurs after delivery (14 out of 14); acute onset of POP in pregnancy rarely resolves in pregnancy (2 out of 27), but often resolves after delivery (18 out of 27). Most patients were managed with bed rest (20 out of 41), pessary (15 out of 41), manual reduction (6 out of 41) and local treatment (6 out of 41). The most common complications reported include preterm labour (14 out of 41), cervical ulcerations (9 out of 41), infection (3 out of 41) and obstructed labour (4 out of 41). About a half of the women delivered vaginally (22 out of 41), caesarean section due to prolapse was required in 15 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct entities were identified based on similarities regarding onset, course and outcome of POP in pregnancy. Concise recommendations for practice were derived from the analysis of case studies published since 1990.
650    _2
$a klid na lůžku $7 D001510
650    _2
$a císařský řez $7 D002585
650    _2
$a dystokie $x etiologie $7 D004420
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a předčasná porodní činnost $x etiologie $7 D007752
650    _2
$a prolaps pánevních orgánů $x komplikace $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D056887
650    _2
$a pesary $7 D010570
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a komplikace těhotenství $x etiologie $7 D011248
650    _2
$a infekční komplikace v těhotenství $x etiologie $7 D011251
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Bombieri, L
700    1_
$a Freeman, R M
773    0_
$w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 26, č. 8 (2015), s. 1103-9
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25600351 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160728105824 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1155666 $s 945524
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 26 $c 8 $d 1103-9 $e 20150120 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...