-
Something wrong with this record ?
Procidentia in pregnancy: a systematic review and recommendations for practice
Z. Rusavy, L. Bombieri, RM. Freeman,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2010-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Cesarean Section MeSH
- Dystocia etiology MeSH
- Pregnancy Complications, Infectious etiology MeSH
- Bed Rest MeSH
- Pregnancy Complications etiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pessaries MeSH
- Obstetric Labor, Premature etiology MeSH
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse complications diagnosis therapy MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in pregnancy is a rare condition with decreasing incidence and improved management and outcome world-wide recently. Systematic review of the literature for cases of POP in pregnancy published since 1990 was carried out to identify common factors in presentation, management and outcomes. One case from our own practice was added to the analysis. METHODS: An extensive search of the Pubmed/Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was performed to identify all cases of POP in pregnancy since 1990. Published case reports of POP in pregnancy were reviewed and summarized in tables to find similarities in history, course, management and outcome of the pregnancies. RESULTS: Of the 43 cases and one case series, 41 case studies were eligible for analysis. Two types of POP in pregnancy were identified: preexisting is less common (14 vs 27 cases), often resolves during pregnancy (5 out of 14) and always recurs after delivery (14 out of 14); acute onset of POP in pregnancy rarely resolves in pregnancy (2 out of 27), but often resolves after delivery (18 out of 27). Most patients were managed with bed rest (20 out of 41), pessary (15 out of 41), manual reduction (6 out of 41) and local treatment (6 out of 41). The most common complications reported include preterm labour (14 out of 41), cervical ulcerations (9 out of 41), infection (3 out of 41) and obstructed labour (4 out of 41). About a half of the women delivered vaginally (22 out of 41), caesarean section due to prolapse was required in 15 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct entities were identified based on similarities regarding onset, course and outcome of POP in pregnancy. Concise recommendations for practice were derived from the analysis of case studies published since 1990.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16020996
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160728105602.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00192-014-2595-3 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00192-014-2595-3 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25600351
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Rusavy, Zdenek $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Alej Svobody 80, Pilsen, 30460, Czech Republic, rusavyz@fnplzen.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Procidentia in pregnancy: a systematic review and recommendations for practice / $c Z. Rusavy, L. Bombieri, RM. Freeman,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in pregnancy is a rare condition with decreasing incidence and improved management and outcome world-wide recently. Systematic review of the literature for cases of POP in pregnancy published since 1990 was carried out to identify common factors in presentation, management and outcomes. One case from our own practice was added to the analysis. METHODS: An extensive search of the Pubmed/Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was performed to identify all cases of POP in pregnancy since 1990. Published case reports of POP in pregnancy were reviewed and summarized in tables to find similarities in history, course, management and outcome of the pregnancies. RESULTS: Of the 43 cases and one case series, 41 case studies were eligible for analysis. Two types of POP in pregnancy were identified: preexisting is less common (14 vs 27 cases), often resolves during pregnancy (5 out of 14) and always recurs after delivery (14 out of 14); acute onset of POP in pregnancy rarely resolves in pregnancy (2 out of 27), but often resolves after delivery (18 out of 27). Most patients were managed with bed rest (20 out of 41), pessary (15 out of 41), manual reduction (6 out of 41) and local treatment (6 out of 41). The most common complications reported include preterm labour (14 out of 41), cervical ulcerations (9 out of 41), infection (3 out of 41) and obstructed labour (4 out of 41). About a half of the women delivered vaginally (22 out of 41), caesarean section due to prolapse was required in 15 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct entities were identified based on similarities regarding onset, course and outcome of POP in pregnancy. Concise recommendations for practice were derived from the analysis of case studies published since 1990.
- 650 _2
- $a klid na lůžku $7 D001510
- 650 _2
- $a císařský řez $7 D002585
- 650 _2
- $a dystokie $x etiologie $7 D004420
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a předčasná porodní činnost $x etiologie $7 D007752
- 650 _2
- $a prolaps pánevních orgánů $x komplikace $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D056887
- 650 _2
- $a pesary $7 D010570
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a komplikace těhotenství $x etiologie $7 D011248
- 650 _2
- $a infekční komplikace v těhotenství $x etiologie $7 D011251
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Bombieri, L
- 700 1_
- $a Freeman, R M
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 26, č. 8 (2015), s. 1103-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25600351 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160722 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160728105824 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1155666 $s 945524
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 26 $c 8 $d 1103-9 $e 20150120 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160722