-
Something wrong with this record ?
Robot assisted Aortic and Non-aortic Vascular Operations
P. Štádler, L. Dvořáček, P. Vitásek, P. Matouš,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Video-Audio Media
- MeSH
- Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal surgery MeSH
- Aneurysm surgery MeSH
- Splenic Artery surgery MeSH
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases surgery MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Endoleak etiology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mammary Arteries surgery MeSH
- Aortic Diseases surgery MeSH
- Vascular Diseases surgery MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Robotic Surgical Procedures methods MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Vascular Surgical Procedures instrumentation methods MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Video-Audio Media MeSH
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical experience with 310 robot assisted vascular procedures. The da Vinci system has been used by a variety of disciplines for laparoscopic procedures but the use of robots in vascular surgery is still relatively uncommon. METHODS: From November 2005 to May 2014, 310 robot assisted vascular operations were performed. Two hundred and twenty four patients were prospectively evaluated for occlusive disease, 61 patients for abdominal aortic aneurysm, four for a common iliac artery aneurysm, four for a splenic artery aneurysm, one for a internal mammary artery aneurysm, and after the unsuccessful endovascular treatment five for hybrid procedures, two patients for median arcuate ligament release and nine for endoleak II treatment post EVAR. Among these patients, 224 underwent robotic occlusive disease treatment (Group I), 65 robotic aorto-iliac aneurysm surgery (Group II) and 21 other robotic procedures (Group III). RESULTS: A total of 298 cases (96.1%) were successfully completed robotically. In 10 patients (3.2%) conversion was necessary. The 30 day mortality was 0.3%, and two (0.6%) late prosthetic infections were seen. Targeted Group I and Group II patients were compared. Robotic ilio-femoral bypass, aorto-femoral bypass, or aorto-iliac thrombo-endarterectomy with prosthetic patch (Group I) required an operative time of 194 (range, 127-315) minutes and robotic aorto-iliac aneurysm surgery (Group II), 253 (range, 185-360) minutes. The mean aortic cross clamping time was 37 minutes in Group I and 93 minutes in Group II. The mean blood loss was more significant in Group II (1,210 mL) than in Group I (320 mL). CONCLUSION: From a practical point of view, the greatest advantage of the robot assisted procedure has been the speed and relative simplicity of construction of the vascular anastomosis. This experience with robot assisted laparoscopic surgery has demonstrated the feasibility of this technique in different areas of vascular surgery.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17000304
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170116105440.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170103s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.02.016 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.02.016 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27036373
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Štádler, P $u Department of Vascular Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: petr.stadler@homolka.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Robot assisted Aortic and Non-aortic Vascular Operations / $c P. Štádler, L. Dvořáček, P. Vitásek, P. Matouš,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical experience with 310 robot assisted vascular procedures. The da Vinci system has been used by a variety of disciplines for laparoscopic procedures but the use of robots in vascular surgery is still relatively uncommon. METHODS: From November 2005 to May 2014, 310 robot assisted vascular operations were performed. Two hundred and twenty four patients were prospectively evaluated for occlusive disease, 61 patients for abdominal aortic aneurysm, four for a common iliac artery aneurysm, four for a splenic artery aneurysm, one for a internal mammary artery aneurysm, and after the unsuccessful endovascular treatment five for hybrid procedures, two patients for median arcuate ligament release and nine for endoleak II treatment post EVAR. Among these patients, 224 underwent robotic occlusive disease treatment (Group I), 65 robotic aorto-iliac aneurysm surgery (Group II) and 21 other robotic procedures (Group III). RESULTS: A total of 298 cases (96.1%) were successfully completed robotically. In 10 patients (3.2%) conversion was necessary. The 30 day mortality was 0.3%, and two (0.6%) late prosthetic infections were seen. Targeted Group I and Group II patients were compared. Robotic ilio-femoral bypass, aorto-femoral bypass, or aorto-iliac thrombo-endarterectomy with prosthetic patch (Group I) required an operative time of 194 (range, 127-315) minutes and robotic aorto-iliac aneurysm surgery (Group II), 253 (range, 185-360) minutes. The mean aortic cross clamping time was 37 minutes in Group I and 93 minutes in Group II. The mean blood loss was more significant in Group II (1,210 mL) than in Group I (320 mL). CONCLUSION: From a practical point of view, the greatest advantage of the robot assisted procedure has been the speed and relative simplicity of construction of the vascular anastomosis. This experience with robot assisted laparoscopic surgery has demonstrated the feasibility of this technique in different areas of vascular surgery.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a aneurysma $x chirurgie $7 D000783
- 650 _2
- $a aneurysma břišní aorty $x chirurgie $7 D017544
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci aorty $x chirurgie $7 D001018
- 650 _2
- $a arteriální okluzní nemoci $x chirurgie $7 D001157
- 650 _2
- $a endoleak $x etiologie $7 D057867
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a mamární tepny $x chirurgie $7 D008323
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a roboticky asistované výkony $x metody $7 D065287
- 650 _2
- $a arteria lienalis $x chirurgie $7 D013157
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci cév $x chirurgie $7 D014652
- 650 _2
- $a výkony cévní chirurgie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D014656
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a audiovizuální média $7 D059040
- 700 1_
- $a Dvořáček, L $u Department of Vascular Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vitásek, P $u Department of Vascular Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Matouš, P $u Department of Vascular Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001653 $t European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery $x 1532-2165 $g Roč. 52, č. 1 (2016), s. 22-8
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27036373 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170116105545 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1179444 $s 960871
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 52 $c 1 $d 22-8 $e 20160329 $i 1532-2165 $m European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery $n Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg $x MED00001653
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170103