• Something wrong with this record ?

Robot assisted Aortic and Non-aortic Vascular Operations

P. Štádler, L. Dvořáček, P. Vitásek, P. Matouš,

. 2016 ; 52 (1) : 22-8. [pub] 20160329

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Video-Audio Media

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical experience with 310 robot assisted vascular procedures. The da Vinci system has been used by a variety of disciplines for laparoscopic procedures but the use of robots in vascular surgery is still relatively uncommon. METHODS: From November 2005 to May 2014, 310 robot assisted vascular operations were performed. Two hundred and twenty four patients were prospectively evaluated for occlusive disease, 61 patients for abdominal aortic aneurysm, four for a common iliac artery aneurysm, four for a splenic artery aneurysm, one for a internal mammary artery aneurysm, and after the unsuccessful endovascular treatment five for hybrid procedures, two patients for median arcuate ligament release and nine for endoleak II treatment post EVAR. Among these patients, 224 underwent robotic occlusive disease treatment (Group I), 65 robotic aorto-iliac aneurysm surgery (Group II) and 21 other robotic procedures (Group III). RESULTS: A total of 298 cases (96.1%) were successfully completed robotically. In 10 patients (3.2%) conversion was necessary. The 30 day mortality was 0.3%, and two (0.6%) late prosthetic infections were seen. Targeted Group I and Group II patients were compared. Robotic ilio-femoral bypass, aorto-femoral bypass, or aorto-iliac thrombo-endarterectomy with prosthetic patch (Group I) required an operative time of 194 (range, 127-315) minutes and robotic aorto-iliac aneurysm surgery (Group II), 253 (range, 185-360) minutes. The mean aortic cross clamping time was 37 minutes in Group I and 93 minutes in Group II. The mean blood loss was more significant in Group II (1,210 mL) than in Group I (320 mL). CONCLUSION: From a practical point of view, the greatest advantage of the robot assisted procedure has been the speed and relative simplicity of construction of the vascular anastomosis. This experience with robot assisted laparoscopic surgery has demonstrated the feasibility of this technique in different areas of vascular surgery.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17000304
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170116105440.0
007      
ta
008      
170103s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.02.016 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.02.016 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27036373
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Štádler, P $u Department of Vascular Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: petr.stadler@homolka.cz.
245    10
$a Robot assisted Aortic and Non-aortic Vascular Operations / $c P. Štádler, L. Dvořáček, P. Vitásek, P. Matouš,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical experience with 310 robot assisted vascular procedures. The da Vinci system has been used by a variety of disciplines for laparoscopic procedures but the use of robots in vascular surgery is still relatively uncommon. METHODS: From November 2005 to May 2014, 310 robot assisted vascular operations were performed. Two hundred and twenty four patients were prospectively evaluated for occlusive disease, 61 patients for abdominal aortic aneurysm, four for a common iliac artery aneurysm, four for a splenic artery aneurysm, one for a internal mammary artery aneurysm, and after the unsuccessful endovascular treatment five for hybrid procedures, two patients for median arcuate ligament release and nine for endoleak II treatment post EVAR. Among these patients, 224 underwent robotic occlusive disease treatment (Group I), 65 robotic aorto-iliac aneurysm surgery (Group II) and 21 other robotic procedures (Group III). RESULTS: A total of 298 cases (96.1%) were successfully completed robotically. In 10 patients (3.2%) conversion was necessary. The 30 day mortality was 0.3%, and two (0.6%) late prosthetic infections were seen. Targeted Group I and Group II patients were compared. Robotic ilio-femoral bypass, aorto-femoral bypass, or aorto-iliac thrombo-endarterectomy with prosthetic patch (Group I) required an operative time of 194 (range, 127-315) minutes and robotic aorto-iliac aneurysm surgery (Group II), 253 (range, 185-360) minutes. The mean aortic cross clamping time was 37 minutes in Group I and 93 minutes in Group II. The mean blood loss was more significant in Group II (1,210 mL) than in Group I (320 mL). CONCLUSION: From a practical point of view, the greatest advantage of the robot assisted procedure has been the speed and relative simplicity of construction of the vascular anastomosis. This experience with robot assisted laparoscopic surgery has demonstrated the feasibility of this technique in different areas of vascular surgery.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a aneurysma $x chirurgie $7 D000783
650    _2
$a aneurysma břišní aorty $x chirurgie $7 D017544
650    _2
$a nemoci aorty $x chirurgie $7 D001018
650    _2
$a arteriální okluzní nemoci $x chirurgie $7 D001157
650    _2
$a endoleak $x etiologie $7 D057867
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mamární tepny $x chirurgie $7 D008323
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a roboticky asistované výkony $x metody $7 D065287
650    _2
$a arteria lienalis $x chirurgie $7 D013157
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a nemoci cév $x chirurgie $7 D014652
650    _2
$a výkony cévní chirurgie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D014656
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a audiovizuální média $7 D059040
700    1_
$a Dvořáček, L $u Department of Vascular Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vitásek, P $u Department of Vascular Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Matouš, P $u Department of Vascular Surgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001653 $t European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery $x 1532-2165 $g Roč. 52, č. 1 (2016), s. 22-8
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27036373 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170103 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170116105545 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1179444 $s 960871
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 52 $c 1 $d 22-8 $e 20160329 $i 1532-2165 $m European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery $n Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg $x MED00001653
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170103

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...