Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of Mechanical Thrombectomy with Contact Aspiration, Stent Retriever, and Combined Procedures in Patients with Large-Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke

V. Procházka, T. Jonszta, D. Czerny, J. Krajca, M. Roubec, E. Hurtikova, R. Urbanec, D. Streitová, L. Pavliska, A. Vrtkova,

. 2018 ; 24 (-) : 9342-9353. [pub] 20181222

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19012014

BACKGROUND We investigated the properties and effects of 5 mechanical thrombectomy procedures in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The relationships between the type of procedure, the time required, the success of recanalization, and the clinical outcome were analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective comparative analysis included 500 patients with acute ischemic stroke and large-vessel occlusion. We compared contact aspiration thrombectomy (ADAPT, n=100), stent retriever first line (SRFL, n=196), the Solumbra technique (n=64), mechanical thrombectomy plus stent implantation (n=81), and a combined procedure (n=59). RESULTS ADAPT provided shorter procedure (P<0.001) and recanalization times (P<0.001) than the other techniques. Better clinical outcome was achieved for ischemia in the anterior circulation than ischemia in the posterior fossa (P<0.001). Compared to the other techniques, patients treated with ADAPT procedure had increased odds of achieving better mTICI scores (P=0.002) and clinical outcome (NIHSS) after 7 days (P=0.003); patients treated with SRFL had increased odds of achieving better long-term clinical status (3M-mRS=0-2; P=0.040). Patients with SRFL and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) had increased odds of better clinical status (3M-mRS=0-2; P=0.031) and decreased odds of death (P=0.005) compared to patients with SRFL without IVT. The other treatment approaches had no additional effect of IVT. Patients with SRFL with a mothership transfer had increased odds of achieving favorable clinical outcome (3M-mRS) compared to SRFL with the drip-and-ship transfer paradigm (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that ADAPT and SRFL provided significantly better outcomes compared to the other examined techniques. A mothership transfer and IVT administration contributed to the success of the SRFL approach.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012014
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210322135747.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.12659/MSM.913458 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30578729
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Procházka, Václav $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Comparison of Mechanical Thrombectomy with Contact Aspiration, Stent Retriever, and Combined Procedures in Patients with Large-Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke / $c V. Procházka, T. Jonszta, D. Czerny, J. Krajca, M. Roubec, E. Hurtikova, R. Urbanec, D. Streitová, L. Pavliska, A. Vrtkova,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND We investigated the properties and effects of 5 mechanical thrombectomy procedures in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The relationships between the type of procedure, the time required, the success of recanalization, and the clinical outcome were analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective comparative analysis included 500 patients with acute ischemic stroke and large-vessel occlusion. We compared contact aspiration thrombectomy (ADAPT, n=100), stent retriever first line (SRFL, n=196), the Solumbra technique (n=64), mechanical thrombectomy plus stent implantation (n=81), and a combined procedure (n=59). RESULTS ADAPT provided shorter procedure (P<0.001) and recanalization times (P<0.001) than the other techniques. Better clinical outcome was achieved for ischemia in the anterior circulation than ischemia in the posterior fossa (P<0.001). Compared to the other techniques, patients treated with ADAPT procedure had increased odds of achieving better mTICI scores (P=0.002) and clinical outcome (NIHSS) after 7 days (P=0.003); patients treated with SRFL had increased odds of achieving better long-term clinical status (3M-mRS=0-2; P=0.040). Patients with SRFL and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) had increased odds of better clinical status (3M-mRS=0-2; P=0.031) and decreased odds of death (P=0.005) compared to patients with SRFL without IVT. The other treatment approaches had no additional effect of IVT. Patients with SRFL with a mothership transfer had increased odds of achieving favorable clinical outcome (3M-mRS) compared to SRFL with the drip-and-ship transfer paradigm (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that ADAPT and SRFL provided significantly better outcomes compared to the other examined techniques. A mothership transfer and IVT administration contributed to the success of the SRFL approach.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ischemie mozku $x terapie $7 D002545
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ischemie $x terapie $7 D007511
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mechanická trombolýza $x metody $7 D061185
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a stenty $7 D015607
650    _2
$a cévní mozková příhoda $x chirurgie $x terapie $7 D020521
650    _2
$a trombektomie $x metody $7 D017131
650    _2
$a trombolytická terapie $x metody $7 D015912
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jonszta, Tomas $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Czerny, Daniel $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Krajca, Jan $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Roubec, Martin $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hurtikova, Eva $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Urbanec, Rene $u Clinic of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Streitová, Dana $u Clinic of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic. St. Elizabeth University of Health and Social Work, Bratislava, Slovakia.
700    1_
$a Pavliska, Lubomir $u IT Department, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vrtková, Adéla $u Department of Applied Mathematics, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic. Department of Deputy Director of Science and Research, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic. $7 xx0258595
773    0_
$w MED00003251 $t Medical science monitor international medical journal of experimental and clinical research $x 1643-3750 $g Roč. 24, č. - (2018), s. 9342-9353
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30578729 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210322135701 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1391324 $s 1050319
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 24 $c - $d 9342-9353 $e 20181222 $i 1643-3750 $m Medical Science Monitor $n Med Sci Monit $x MED00003251
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace