-
Something wrong with this record ?
12-week double-blind randomized multicenter study of efficacy and safety of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) versus escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) in out-patients with severe generalized anxiety disorder
DJ. Stein, JP. Khoo, A. Ahokas, M. Jarema, M. Van Ameringen, L. Vavrusova, C. Hӧschl, M. Bauer, I. Bitter, SN. Mosolov, V. Olivier, S. Matharan, F. Picarel-Blanchot, C. de Bodinat,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Acetamides adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Anti-Anxiety Agents adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Citalopram adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Interview, Psychological MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Psychiatric Status Rating Scales MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Anxiety Disorders drug therapy MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Treatment of severely symptomatic patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) raises particular concerns for clinicians. This 12-week double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) in the treatment of patients with severe GAD, using escitalopram (10-20 mg) as active comparator. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline of the total score on the Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures included rate of response to treatment (at least 50% score reduction from baseline) in the HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety sub-scores, Clinical Global Impression severity and change scores, the Toronto Hospital Alertness Test, the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire Scores. Sixty one clinical centers (Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Slovakia) participated from April 2013 to February 2015. Patient characteristics and demographic data were comparable between treatment groups. Both treatments were associated with a clinically significant decrease in HAM-A total score at week 12; the non-inferiority of agomelatine versus escitalopram was not demonstrated (E(SE) = -0.91(0.69), 95%CI = [-2.26, 0.44], p = 0.195). At week 12, the response rate was 60.9% in the agomelatine group, and 64.8% in the escitalopram group. In both treatment arms, HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety scores decreased, alertness and sleep parameters improved, and ability to experience pleasure increased. In these secondary outcome measures, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Agomelatine was well-tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events than escitalopram. Agomelatine and escitalopram are efficacious in treating GAD patients with severe symptoms.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Semmelweis University Balassa u 6 H 1083 Budapest Hungary
Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier 50 rue Carnot 92284 Suresnes Cedex France
Mehilainen Clinic Runeberginkatu 47 A 00260 Helsinki Finland
National Institute of Mental Health Topolová 748 250 67 Klecany Czechia
Private Psychiatric Practice Vavrušová Consulting s r o Záporožská 12 851 01 Bratislava Slovakia
Toowong Specialist Clinic Level 2 54 Jephson Street Toowong QLD 4066 Australia
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19028255
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250402145555.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813s2018 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.05.006 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30135032
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Stein, Dan J $u University of Cape Town Department of Psychiatry & MRC Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders, Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Cape Town 7925, South Africa. Electronic address: dan.stein@uct.ac.za.
- 245 10
- $a 12-week double-blind randomized multicenter study of efficacy and safety of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) versus escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) in out-patients with severe generalized anxiety disorder / $c DJ. Stein, JP. Khoo, A. Ahokas, M. Jarema, M. Van Ameringen, L. Vavrusova, C. Hӧschl, M. Bauer, I. Bitter, SN. Mosolov, V. Olivier, S. Matharan, F. Picarel-Blanchot, C. de Bodinat,
- 520 9_
- $a Treatment of severely symptomatic patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) raises particular concerns for clinicians. This 12-week double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) in the treatment of patients with severe GAD, using escitalopram (10-20 mg) as active comparator. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline of the total score on the Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures included rate of response to treatment (at least 50% score reduction from baseline) in the HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety sub-scores, Clinical Global Impression severity and change scores, the Toronto Hospital Alertness Test, the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire Scores. Sixty one clinical centers (Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Slovakia) participated from April 2013 to February 2015. Patient characteristics and demographic data were comparable between treatment groups. Both treatments were associated with a clinically significant decrease in HAM-A total score at week 12; the non-inferiority of agomelatine versus escitalopram was not demonstrated (E(SE) = -0.91(0.69), 95%CI = [-2.26, 0.44], p = 0.195). At week 12, the response rate was 60.9% in the agomelatine group, and 64.8% in the escitalopram group. In both treatment arms, HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety scores decreased, alertness and sleep parameters improved, and ability to experience pleasure increased. In these secondary outcome measures, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Agomelatine was well-tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events than escitalopram. Agomelatine and escitalopram are efficacious in treating GAD patients with severe symptoms.
- 650 _2
- $a acetamidy $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000081
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a anxiolytika $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D014151
- 650 _2
- $a úzkostné poruchy $x farmakoterapie $7 D001008
- 650 _2
- $a citalopram $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D015283
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a interview psychologický $7 D007406
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a psychiatrické posuzovací škály $7 D011569
- 650 _2
- $a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Khoo, Jon-Paul $u Toowong Specialist Clinic - Level 2, 54 Jephson Street, Toowong, QLD 4066 Australia.
- 700 1_
- $a Ahokas, Antti $u Mehilainen Clinic, Runeberginkatu, 47 A, 00260 Helsinki, Finland.
- 700 1_
- $a Jarema, Marek $u Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, 3rd Department of Psychiatry, Sobieskiego 9, 02-0957 Warszawa, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Van Ameringen, Michael $u Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1057 Main St. West, Suite L02, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 1B7, Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a Vavrusova, Livia $u Private Psychiatric Practice - Vavrušová Consulting s.r.o., Záporožská 12, 851 01 Bratislava, Slovakia.
- 700 1_
- $a Hӧschl, Cyril $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67 Klecany, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Bauer, Michael $u Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Bitter, István, $d 1949- $u Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa u. 6, H-1083 Budapest Hungary. $7 xx0330815
- 700 1_
- $a Mosolov, Sergey N $u Department for Therapy of Mental Disorders, Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, 3, Poteshnaya street, 107076 Moscow, Russia.
- 700 1_
- $a Olivier, Valérie $u Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), 50 rue Carnot, 92284 Suresnes Cedex, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Matharan, Sophie $u Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), 50 rue Carnot, 92284 Suresnes Cedex, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Picarel-Blanchot, Françoise $u Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), 50 rue Carnot, 92284 Suresnes Cedex, France.
- 700 1_
- $a de Bodinat, Christian $u Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), 50 rue Carnot, 92284 Suresnes Cedex, France.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001656 $t European neuropsychopharmacology $x 1873-7862 $g Roč. 28, č. 8 (2018), s. 970-979
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30135032 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250402145551 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1433404 $s 1066715
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 28 $c 8 $d 970-979 $e 20180706 $i 1873-7862 $m European neuropsychopharmacology $n Eur Neuropsychopharmacol $x MED00001656
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813