• Something wrong with this record ?

12-week double-blind randomized multicenter study of efficacy and safety of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) versus escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) in out-patients with severe generalized anxiety disorder

DJ. Stein, JP. Khoo, A. Ahokas, M. Jarema, M. Van Ameringen, L. Vavrusova, C. Hӧschl, M. Bauer, I. Bitter, SN. Mosolov, V. Olivier, S. Matharan, F. Picarel-Blanchot, C. de Bodinat,

. 2018 ; 28 (8) : 970-979. [pub] 20180706

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Treatment of severely symptomatic patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) raises particular concerns for clinicians. This 12-week double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) in the treatment of patients with severe GAD, using escitalopram (10-20 mg) as active comparator. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline of the total score on the Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures included rate of response to treatment (at least 50% score reduction from baseline) in the HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety sub-scores, Clinical Global Impression severity and change scores, the Toronto Hospital Alertness Test, the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire Scores. Sixty one clinical centers (Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Slovakia) participated from April 2013 to February 2015. Patient characteristics and demographic data were comparable between treatment groups. Both treatments were associated with a clinically significant decrease in HAM-A total score at week 12; the non-inferiority of agomelatine versus escitalopram was not demonstrated (E(SE) = -0.91(0.69), 95%CI = [-2.26, 0.44], p = 0.195). At week 12, the response rate was 60.9% in the agomelatine group, and 64.8% in the escitalopram group. In both treatment arms, HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety scores decreased, alertness and sleep parameters improved, and ability to experience pleasure increased. In these secondary outcome measures, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Agomelatine was well-tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events than escitalopram. Agomelatine and escitalopram are efficacious in treating GAD patients with severe symptoms.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028255
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250402145555.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.05.006 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30135032
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Stein, Dan J $u University of Cape Town Department of Psychiatry & MRC Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders, Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Cape Town 7925, South Africa. Electronic address: dan.stein@uct.ac.za.
245    10
$a 12-week double-blind randomized multicenter study of efficacy and safety of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) versus escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) in out-patients with severe generalized anxiety disorder / $c DJ. Stein, JP. Khoo, A. Ahokas, M. Jarema, M. Van Ameringen, L. Vavrusova, C. Hӧschl, M. Bauer, I. Bitter, SN. Mosolov, V. Olivier, S. Matharan, F. Picarel-Blanchot, C. de Bodinat,
520    9_
$a Treatment of severely symptomatic patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) raises particular concerns for clinicians. This 12-week double-blind study evaluated the efficacy of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) in the treatment of patients with severe GAD, using escitalopram (10-20 mg) as active comparator. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline of the total score on the Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) at week 12. Secondary outcome measures included rate of response to treatment (at least 50% score reduction from baseline) in the HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety sub-scores, Clinical Global Impression severity and change scores, the Toronto Hospital Alertness Test, the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire Scores. Sixty one clinical centers (Australia, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Slovakia) participated from April 2013 to February 2015. Patient characteristics and demographic data were comparable between treatment groups. Both treatments were associated with a clinically significant decrease in HAM-A total score at week 12; the non-inferiority of agomelatine versus escitalopram was not demonstrated (E(SE) = -0.91(0.69), 95%CI = [-2.26, 0.44], p = 0.195). At week 12, the response rate was 60.9% in the agomelatine group, and 64.8% in the escitalopram group. In both treatment arms, HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety scores decreased, alertness and sleep parameters improved, and ability to experience pleasure increased. In these secondary outcome measures, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups. Agomelatine was well-tolerated, with a lower incidence of adverse events than escitalopram. Agomelatine and escitalopram are efficacious in treating GAD patients with severe symptoms.
650    _2
$a acetamidy $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000081
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a anxiolytika $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D014151
650    _2
$a úzkostné poruchy $x farmakoterapie $7 D001008
650    _2
$a citalopram $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D015283
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a interview psychologický $7 D007406
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a psychiatrické posuzovací škály $7 D011569
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Khoo, Jon-Paul $u Toowong Specialist Clinic - Level 2, 54 Jephson Street, Toowong, QLD 4066 Australia.
700    1_
$a Ahokas, Antti $u Mehilainen Clinic, Runeberginkatu, 47 A, 00260 Helsinki, Finland.
700    1_
$a Jarema, Marek $u Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, 3rd Department of Psychiatry, Sobieskiego 9, 02-0957 Warszawa, Poland.
700    1_
$a Van Ameringen, Michael $u Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1057 Main St. West, Suite L02, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 1B7, Canada.
700    1_
$a Vavrusova, Livia $u Private Psychiatric Practice - Vavrušová Consulting s.r.o., Záporožská 12, 851 01 Bratislava, Slovakia.
700    1_
$a Hӧschl, Cyril $u National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67 Klecany, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Bauer, Michael $u Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
700    1_
$a Bitter, István, $d 1949- $u Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Balassa u. 6, H-1083 Budapest Hungary. $7 xx0330815
700    1_
$a Mosolov, Sergey N $u Department for Therapy of Mental Disorders, Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, 3, Poteshnaya street, 107076 Moscow, Russia.
700    1_
$a Olivier, Valérie $u Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), 50 rue Carnot, 92284 Suresnes Cedex, France.
700    1_
$a Matharan, Sophie $u Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), 50 rue Carnot, 92284 Suresnes Cedex, France.
700    1_
$a Picarel-Blanchot, Françoise $u Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), 50 rue Carnot, 92284 Suresnes Cedex, France.
700    1_
$a de Bodinat, Christian $u Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), 50 rue Carnot, 92284 Suresnes Cedex, France.
773    0_
$w MED00001656 $t European neuropsychopharmacology $x 1873-7862 $g Roč. 28, č. 8 (2018), s. 970-979
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30135032 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250402145551 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433404 $s 1066715
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 28 $c 8 $d 970-979 $e 20180706 $i 1873-7862 $m European neuropsychopharmacology $n Eur Neuropsychopharmacol $x MED00001656
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...